Pension Fund opinion published to avoid new ‘error’

The Chamber of Deputies published this Friday in the Parliamentary Gazette the opinion for the creation of the Pension Fund for Wellbeing, which will be discussed in the Plenary next Monday the 21st at 1:00 p.m.

In this way, the San Lázaro Social Security Commission reinstated the procedure that was challenged by opposition legislators last Wednesday, when it was discovered that the opinion that was brought to the plenary session that day was not the same as the one that had been approved in commissions. on Monday, April 15.

On the website of the Parliamentary Gazette The 106-page document was released that yesterday, Thursday, all the deputies of the Social Security Commission had to sign page by page, to guarantee the authenticity of the document that will be analyzed on Monday the 22nd and thus avoid the appearance of new “legislative goblins.” ” that they can modify it.

As reported in this newspaper, the previous Wednesday the analysis and eventual approval of the opinion by which Morena and its allies in the Chamber seek to create the Pension Fund for Wellbeing had to be postponed, after opposition legislators denounced that that document had been modified.

Yesterday, Thursday, the Social Security Commission had to meet again to ratify the opinion that had already voted on Monday the 15th, and send it again to the Board of Directors.

For its part, this last legislative body stressed that the responsibility of “submitting correctly, without errors or inconsistencies, and a reliable version of the approved opinions” rests with the Social Security Commission and its technical team, which is why it rejected that there was It was the Board of Directors who changed the text.

The Morena deputy Ivonne Cisneros, president of the aforementioned commission, stated at the time that it had been the Board of Directors of San Lázaro who had made the mistake, a position that even differed with that of the coordinator of the Morena bench, Ignacio Mier, who He attributed the ruling to the Social Security Commission.