Penguin Diode is unfair, 2 years, hit 40 cases, only in Section 112, year 63, total 12
On December 18, 2020 at 5:12 p.m.
–
The People’s Leader acknowledged the charges of the Bang Pho Police Station. The case of the assembly in front of the parliament, November 17, 2020, the Penguin Diode is unfair, 2 years, 40 cases, only in Section 112, year 63, total of 12 cases
At the Bang Pho Police Station, Miss Chonthicha Changed Soon, the leader of the People’s Group, along with Mr. Wachirawit Rungruangsiriphon Independent Red Shirt Leader and Mr. Kunakorn Munathirai, a lawyer from the Human Rights Attorney Center Traveled to meet Col. Suradet Potchana Wongpanit, police chief of Bang Pho Police, to acknowledge the subpoena of the offense of not notifying the community under the Public Assembly Act. From organizing a rally in front of the Parliament building on 17 Nov 20
Mr. Kunakorn Mannathirai, a lawyer, revealed that today the police have called all 6 groups of leaders to follow, but today only 3 people have arrived, while the other 3 are Mr. Panupong Chadnok or Mike Rayong, Mr. Amnon Nam. Pha and Mr. Ekachai Hongkangwarn asked to postpone the investigation before the investigation official, while the leader who met the inquiry official today denied all allegations. And will hasten to make documents in writing and submit to the inquiry official again
Later, Mr. Prit Chivarak or Penguin, the leader of the rally And the attorney came to meet the investigation officer of the Bang Pho Police Station on the summons for organizing the assembly without notifying the official under Public Assembly Act From the same congress In which the inquiry official informed the lawyer that Will report additional allegations to Mr. Prit In an offense under the Criminal Code, m.116 and m 215, which is an offense on assembly
Mr. Prit said that since the start of the demonstration activities over the past two years, he has been prosecuted for more than 40 cases, especially this year, he was prosecuted for Section 112, a total of 12 cases, so he considered the government officials to use the law unfair. .
– .