Pendant “Wachiraporn” to clarify the knot, 5 hundred thousand lobby money to exchange the position of the NACC
On March 4, Mr. Chaichana Detdecho, MP for Nakhon Si Thammarat and Deputy Secretary-General of the Democratic Party (NACC) mentioned the case of Mr. Trirong Suwankiri, deputy leader of the Ruam Thai Sang Chart Party (RTC). Indicated that Ms. Wachiraporn Kanchana, candidate The Surat Thani MP for the RBTC told Mr. Chumphon Kanchana, a former Surat Thani MP for several periods and a leader of the RBTC, that he was offered 500,000 baht to help lobby people in the group. Ms. Wachiraporn In order to be able to hold the position of Executive Director of the Democratic Party. and he made a statement to Ms. Wachiraporn came out to clarify, but did not receive an answer that
He has requested the way Miss Wachiraporn, Mr. Chumpol and Mr. Trirong clarify evidence that In the election of the Democrat Party executive committee in 2019, who offered money? Ms. Wachiraporn In order to lobby 3 other friends to support the party’s executive committee position because Mr. Trirong suddenly opened a serious issue. Despite the lapse of almost 4 years, I would like to inquire with those involved as Mr. Trirong said whether it is true or not, but it appears that instead of receiving clarification from the person Mr. Trirong alluded to Instead, someone brought this story to spin the trend to damage the Democratic Party. amid public suspicion that People of the People’s Democratic Party act as they say or not.
Mr. Chaichana continued that in order to clarify the doubts of the people. He therefore asked to observe and ask questions to Ms. Wachiraporn About this case, 4 items are: 1. Why when Ms. Wachiraporn know about Instead, he kept quiet and did not follow the party’s rules and regulations. related to member punishment Immediately at that time because it is considered a serious matter that negatively affects the prestige of the party Including violating the principle of the party that all members of the executive committee must be approved by the general meeting without being overwhelmed by anyone under any influence
2. Ms. Wachiraporn It should be revealed who the 3 people that Ms. Wachiraporn claimed were those who offered money to lobby, because all 3 people could be witnesses confirming that what Ms. .Wachiraporn said it was true Because the person offering money Ms. Wachiraporn would foresee that all 3 people would have an effect on winning and losing and have an intimate relationship with Ms. Wachiraporn very well, so I hope Ms. Wachiraporn Continue to convince all 3 people to turn to support those who offer money. in order to eventually advance to the position of the Executive Committee of the Party
3. If Ms. Wachiraporn confirms that the offeror He is a member of the current party executive committee. The Democratic Party will investigate this matter without delay. and if the investigation results show that guilty Immediate action was taken to remove him from party membership. But if not holding the position of executive director The party will immediately take decisive measures against such party members as well, but if Ms. Wachiraporn allegations cannot be identified as Who is offering money? Or those accused by Ms. Wachiraporn can bring evidence to refute. Ms. Wachiraporn must also accept the legal consequences
And 4. If this story is not true in the first place Ms. Wachiraporn should have the courage to explain to the public Because of the address A politician belonging to the same party used the name Ms. Wachiraporn. Come as a tool to hope that the rival party loses that popular vote. It is considered very inappropriate because now the current society is beginning to question Ms. Wachiraporn more, asking them to disclose all Because it is considered a very dangerous matter for democracy.
“I sympathize with Ms. Wachiraporn, who was suddenly attacked by politicians within the current party. to use the name for political purposes In the past, I have tried to call on people involved in this matter to clarify the public’s doubts. but what I got Instead, this was used as a tool to discredit the Democratic Party, which I knew the purpose of this action. But when the 500,000 baht was mentioned at the Party’s general meeting to select the party’s executive committee almost four years ago, I had to ask the person in Mr. Trairong’s speech because it was the beginning of the whole story. But when the person Mr. Trirong claims has not yet moved I had to question and observe about this matter.
Because this kind of thing is serious. to the Democratic Party and overall democracy Because many former Democratic Party leaders, including Mr. Jurin Laksanawisit, the party’s leader, highlighted the serious danger of Thanong. which is very dangerous for the country by destroying the country for many generations both the bidding for the MPs, the bidding for the candidates because in the end it is the source of capital withdrawal Then leads to corruption and corruption and is a story that in addition to destroying the country eventually destroys democracy In the event that money is offered Ms. Wachiraporn The lobby to get the position of the executive committee of the party is also considered to be in the network, so if Ms. Wachiraporn still have a sense of responsibility towards democracy and the public should have revealed the whole story as soon as possible and came from the mouth of Ms. Wachiraporn by herself, because if she is silent or has already let go Ms. Wachiraporn should know that What will be the result? ”said Mr. Chaichana.
