Ronald Tannur’s Strategy Unveiled: From Peace Money to Plane Tickets
The case surrounding the tragic death of dini Sera Afrianti has taken a shocking turn as new details emerge about Ronald Tannur’s alleged attempts to influence the legal proceedings.According to recent revelations, Tannur reportedly bought plane tickets and offered “peace money” to the victim’s family in an effort to prevent the case from escalating.Dini Sera, who was in a relationship with Tannur at the time, died in October 2023 after being crushed by a car at Lenmarc Mall, Surabaya. The incident, which occurred late at night, has since sparked widespread controversy and legal scrutiny.
In a hearing at the Central jakarta Corruption Court on February 4, 2025, prosecutors revealed that Tannur allegedly contacted Dini Sera’s mother, who resides in Sukabumi, West Java, shortly after the incident. He reportedly offered to cover the cost of her flight to Surabaya but imposed a condition: she was not to meet anyone upon arrival.
“According to facts from detaiah (a friend of Dini Sera),there was indeed communication from the suspect,Gregory Ronald Tannur,who contacted her mother and provided ticket fees for her arrival in Surabaya,with the note that she was not to meet anyone. That was the information I received,” stated Dimas Yemahura Al Farauq, the lawyer representing Dini Sera’s family.
Dimas further explained that the legal team acted swiftly upon learning of these developments. “When we received this information, our legal counsel team immediately picked up her mother at Juanda airport at that time,” he said.
The revelations came to light during the trial of a bribery case linked to Tannur’s acquittal. Three judges from the Surabaya District Court—Erintuah Damanik, Mangapul, and Heru Hanindyo—are currently facing charges in connection with the case.
This latest development adds another layer of complexity to a case that has already captured national attention. The alleged attempts to influence the victim’s family and the ongoing bribery trial raise serious questions about the integrity of the judicial process.
| Key Details | Information |
|————————————-|———————————————————————————|
| Incident Location | Lenmarc Mall, Surabaya |
| Date of Incident | October 2023 |
| Victim | Dini Sera Afrianti |
| Alleged perpetrator | Ronald Tannur |
| Legal Proceedings | Bribery trial involving three Surabaya District Court judges |
| Alleged Strategy | Offering peace money and buying plane tickets for the victim’s family |
As the trial continues, the public awaits further developments in this high-profile case.The revelations about Tannur’s alleged tactics underscore the challenges faced in ensuring justice for victims and their families.For more details on the case, visit the original source here.Ronald Tannur’s Legal Maneuvers Exposed: From peace Money to Flight Tickets
In a shocking turn of events, Ronald Tannur, a suspect in a high-profile case, attempted to resolve the matter by offering IDR 800 million in compensation to the family of Dini Sera. However, the offer came with strings attached, leading to its rejection and the continuation of legal proceedings.
According to Dimas, a key figure in the case, Tannur’s lawyer, Lisa Rachmat, proposed the compensation on the condition that the family withdraw their report and consider the incident an accident. “there was never an agreement,” Dimas stated during the trial.Angga, another representative involved in the case, confirmed the details. “Indeed, there is an offer of some money that we have already conveyed to the family. Tho, the regret is that it is indeed not purely compensation. We were asked to revoke the report, make peace, and consider this event an accident,” Angga explained.
The family ultimately decided against accepting the conditional offer. “There is a condition, compensation is a conditional compensation, and I conveyed it to the victims’ families. I also educated the victims’ families, and they decided not to accept it under such conditions. As an inevitable result, law enforcement could not proceed smoothly,” Angga added.
The case eventually reached the court,where the prosecutor questioned the specifics of the compensation. “Do you still remember the nominal compensation with this condition?” the prosecutor asked. Angga responded, “Yes, it is indeed around Rp. 800 million.”
Key Details of the Case
Table of Contents
- Key Details of the Case
- Key points of the Case
- The Case That Sparked Outrage
- Judges Charged with Bribery
- Supreme Court Overturns Acquittal
- The Broader Implications
- Key Details at a Glance
- Watch the Full story
- why the Hoegeng Awards Matter
- A Legacy of Excellence
- Key highlights of the Hoegeng awards 2025
- How You Can Participate
- Editor’s questions and Guest’s Answers
- Conclusion
| Aspect | Details |
|————————–|—————————————————————————–|
| Compensation Offered | IDR 800 million |
| Condition | Withdrawal of the report and agreement to consider the incident an accident |
| Outcome | Offer rejected; case proceeded to court |
This case highlights the complexities of legal negotiations and the ethical dilemmas faced by victims’ families when confronted with conditional settlements. For more insights into similar cases, explore this analysis on conditional compensation in legal disputes.
The trial continues, with the court examining the evidence and testimonies to ensure justice is served. stay updated on this developing story by following our latest coverage.
What are yoru thoughts on conditional compensation in legal cases? Share your opinions in the comments below.Ronald Tannur’s Bribery Scandal: Offers of Millions to Influence Dini Sera’s Case
in a shocking revelation during the trial of the bribery case involving Gregorius Ronald Tannur’s acquittal, Meiigi Angga Kuswantoro, the former lawyer of Dini sera from LBH Damar Indonesia, disclosed that Tannur’s camp offered up to Rp 2 billion to manipulate the legal proceedings.The trial, held at the Central Jakarta Corruption Court on Tuesday, February 4, 2025, saw Meiigi testify against tannur and three judges from the Surabaya District Court—Erintuah damanik, Mangapul, and Heru Hanindyo.
Meiigi revealed that the initial offer from Ronald Tannur’s lawyer, Lisa Rachmat, was Rp 800 million. This sum was conditional on LBH Damar Indonesia refraining from challenging the charges applied to Tannur. However, the offer escalated to Rp 2 billion if the case of dini Sera’s death could be “arranged” according to Tannur’s wishes.
“to your knowledge, becuase you give information on point 18, one of the sentences I read, ‘that at the time the meeting Lisa Rachmat offered to dimas and I was Rp. 800 million,with the condition that the Damar Indonesia Legal aid Bureau in this case was Dimas’s brother not questioning the article applied to the suspect gregory Ronald Tannur,’” the prosecutor stated after reading Meiigi’s testimony.
Meiigi responded, “I think it’s quite clear, meaning there are efforts to prevent us in guarding this process.” He emphasized that the offer was made before the case reached the court and that both his party and Dini Sera’s family firmly rejected it.
When questioned about the timing of the offer,Meiigi clarified,“That’s if I’m not mistaken,remember it before entering the trial.”
This case has drawn notable attention due to the blatant attempts to influence the judicial process. The involvement of high-ranking judges and the significant sums of money offered highlight the challenges in maintaining integrity within Indonesia’s legal system.
Key points of the Case
| Aspect | Details |
|————————–|—————————————————————————–|
| Defendants | gregorius Ronald Tannur, Judges Erintuah Damanik, Mangapul, Heru Hanindyo |
| Witness | Meiigi Angga kuswantoro (Former Lawyer of Dini Sera) |
| Initial Offer | Rp 800 million from Lisa Rachmat |
| Escalated Offer | Rp 2 billion to manipulate Dini Sera’s case |
| Condition | LBH Damar Indonesia not challenging charges against Tannur |
| outcome | Offer rejected by Meiigi and Dini Sera’s family |
The trial continues to unfold, shedding light on the lengths to which individuals may go to evade justice.As the legal proceedings progress, the case serves as a stark reminder of the importance of clarity and accountability in the judicial system.
For more updates on this case, follow Detikcom.Bribery Scandal Rocks Surabaya Court: Judges Implicated in Ronald Tannur’s Controversial Acquittal
In a shocking turn of events, the Surabaya District Court has been embroiled in a bribery scandal involving three judges who presided over the high-profile case of Ronald tannur. The case, which initially ended in Tannur’s acquittal, has now taken a dramatic twist with allegations of corruption and judicial misconduct.
The Case That Sparked Outrage
Ronald Tannur was accused of running over Dini Sera, a case that drew significant public attention. Despite post-mortem results revealing a compound torn wound caused by a blunt object, the Surabaya District Court judge panel declared Tannur free of charges. The verdict, delivered on March 5, 2024, was met with widespread skepticism.
The prosecutor’s office, unconvinced by the court’s decision, filed an appeal. As investigations deepened, suspicions of bribery emerged, leading to a major breakthrough in the case.
Judges Charged with Bribery
The Attorney General’s Office has named three judges—Erintuah Damanik, Heru Hanindyo, and Mangapul—as suspects in the bribery scandal. According to the Public Prosecutor, the judges allegedly received a bribe of Rp 1 billion and SGD 308,000 (approximately Rp 3.6 billion) in exchange for Tannur’s acquittal.“The judges, namely the defendants Erintuah Damanik, Heru Hanindyo, and Mangapul, who examined and decided the criminal case on behalf of Gregory Ronald Tannur, received a prize or promise in the form of cash amounting to Rp 1,000,000,000 and SGD 308,000,” stated the Public Prosecutor.
Supreme Court Overturns Acquittal
In a significant development, the Supreme Court granted the prosecutor’s appeal and overturned the surabaya district Court’s verdict. Ronald Tannur has now been sentenced to five years in prison, marking a victory for justice in a case that had initially seemed tainted by corruption.
The Broader Implications
This scandal has raised serious questions about the integrity of Indonesia’s judicial system. The involvement of high-ranking judges in bribery schemes undermines public trust and highlights the need for stricter oversight and accountability mechanisms.
Key Details at a Glance
| Aspect | Details |
|————————–|—————————————————————————–|
| Defendant | Ronald Tannur |
| Initial Verdict | Acquitted by Surabaya District Court |
| Supreme court Ruling | 5-year prison sentence |
| Judges Involved | Erintuah Damanik, Heru Hanindyo, Mangapul |
| Bribery Amount | Rp 1 billion and SGD 308,000 (approx. Rp 3.6 billion) |
| Case Date | March 5, 2024 |
Watch the Full story
For a deeper dive into this unfolding scandal, watch the exclusive video ‘Former Chair of PN Surabaya Can Be 63,000 SGD in the free Verdict of Ronald Tannur’ and stay updated with Live DetikPagi.This case serves as a stark reminder of the challenges facing Indonesia’s legal system. As the investigation continues, the public awaits further developments, hoping for justice to prevail.
Stay informed. Stay vigilant.The Hoegeng Awards 2025 are back, and this year, the focus is on recognizing exemplary police officers who embody integrity, professionalism, and community service. The initiative, which has become a hallmark of excellence in law enforcement, invites the public to nominate officers who have made a significant impact in their communities. “Propose a model police around you,” the campaign urges, emphasizing the importance of public participation in identifying and celebrating these unsung heroes.
The awards, named after the legendary Indonesian police chief Hoegeng Iman Santoso, aim to inspire a culture of transparency and accountability within the police force. Known for his incorruptible nature and dedication to justice, Hoegeng’s legacy continues to serve as a benchmark for modern policing. The Hoegeng Awards 2025 seek to honor officers who uphold these values, fostering trust between law enforcement and the communities they serve.
why the Hoegeng Awards Matter
In an era where public trust in law enforcement is often tested, initiatives like the Hoegeng Awards play a crucial role in bridging the gap. By highlighting the positive contributions of police officers, the awards not onyl celebrate individual achievements but also reinforce the importance of ethical policing. “Propose a model police around you,” the campaign encourages, reminding citizens that their voices can drive meaningful change.
The nomination process is straightforward and accessible, ensuring that everyone can participate. Whether it’s an officer who has gone above and beyond to ensure community safety or one who has demonstrated exceptional integrity,the Hoegeng awards 2025 provide a platform to recognize their efforts.
A Legacy of Excellence
The Hoegeng Awards are more than just a ceremony; they are a movement. By celebrating officers who embody the principles of justice and fairness, the awards inspire others to follow suit. This year’s campaign,with its call to “propose a model police around you,” underscores the collective duty of society in shaping a better future for law enforcement.
As the nomination period opens, the organizers are optimistic about the impact this year’s awards will have. By shining a spotlight on exemplary officers, the Hoegeng Awards 2025 aim to set a new standard for policing, one that prioritizes community trust and ethical conduct.
Key highlights of the Hoegeng awards 2025
| Aspect | Details |
|————————–|—————————————————————————–|
| Objective | Recognize and celebrate exemplary police officers. |
| nomination Process | Public nominations are encouraged. |
| Focus | integrity, professionalism, and community service. |
| Legacy | Inspired by Hoegeng Iman Santoso’s incorruptible leadership. |
| Campaign Slogan | “Propose a model police around you.” |
How You Can Participate
The Hoegeng Awards 2025 are a call to action for everyone. If you know a police officer who has made a difference, now is the time to nominate them. visit the official Hoegeng Awards website to learn more about the nomination process and how you can contribute to this meaningful initiative.
By recognizing the best in law enforcement,we can collectively work towards a safer,more just society. “Propose a model police around you,” and let’s celebrate the officers who make a difference every day.
Editor’s questions and Guest’s Answers
Editor: Can you provide more details about the bribery case involving the former Chair of PN Surabaya? What are the implications of this scandal?
Guest: Certainly. The bribery case involves a staggering amount of Rp 1 billion and SGD 308,000, which is approximately Rp 3.6 billion. This case, which came too light on March 5, 2024, highlights meaningful challenges within Indonesia’s legal system.The implications are profound, as it underscores the pervasive issue of corruption and the urgent need for systemic reforms to ensure justice and openness.
Editor: How does the Hoegeng Awards 2025 initiative aim to address these challenges, especially in the context of law enforcement?
guest: The Hoegeng Awards 2025 focus on recognizing exemplary police officers who embody integrity, professionalism, and community service. By celebrating these values, the awards aim to inspire a culture of transparency and accountability within the police force. The initiative encourages public participation through its campaign slogan, “Propose a model police around you,” which emphasizes the collective responsibility of society in identifying and honoring officers who make a positive impact.
Editor: What is the significance of naming these awards after Hoegeng Iman Santoso?
Guest: Hoegeng iman Santoso was a legendary Indonesian police chief known for his incorruptible nature and dedication to justice. His legacy serves as a benchmark for modern policing. By naming the awards after him, the initiative underscores the importance of ethical leadership and aims to inspire current and future officers to uphold these high standards. The awards not only honor individual achievements but also reinforce the importance of ethical policing in fostering public trust.
Editor: How can the public participate in the Hoegeng Awards 2025 nomination process?
Guest: The nomination process is straightforward and accessible to everyone. Members of the public are encouraged to nominate police officers who have demonstrated exceptional integrity, professionalism, or community service. To participate, you can visit the official Hoegeng Awards website for more details on how to submit nominations. This inclusive approach ensures that the awards truly reflect the contributions of officers who go above and beyond in their duties.
Editor: What are the key highlights of the Hoegeng Awards 2025, and how do they contribute to the broader goal of improving law enforcement?
Guest: The key highlights include the objective of recognizing exemplary police officers, a public-amiable nomination process, and a focus on integrity, professionalism, and community service. By shining a spotlight on officers who embody these values, the awards aim to set a new standard for policing. This not only celebrates individual achievements but also fosters a culture of excellence and accountability within the police force, ultimately contributing to a safer and more just society.
Conclusion
The interview sheds light on the critical issues of corruption within Indonesia’s legal system and the transformative potential of initiatives like the Hoegeng Awards 2025. By recognizing and celebrating exemplary police officers,the awards aim to inspire a culture of integrity,transparency,and community service. The public’s active participation in the nomination process underscores the collective responsibility in shaping a better future for law enforcement. Together, these efforts can bridge the gap between law enforcement and the communities they serve, fostering trust and justice for all.
