nHasto Kristiyanto Denies Renting Djan Faridz’s House Amid KPK Inquiry
In a recent advancement surrounding the ongoing corruption case involving Harun Masiku, the Secretary General of the PDIP, Hasto Kristiyanto,has firmly denied allegations that he rented the house of former PPP Chairperson,Djan Faridz. The house, located in Menteng, was recently searched by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) as part of their investigation into the bribery case.
ronny Talapessy, Chairman of the PDIP DPP and a member of Hasto’s legal team, dismissed the claims as baseless. ”What needs to be responded to huh? I also do not see that there is something related to Mas Hasto. But let it be, that is indeed the authority of the KPK,” Ronny stated when contacted on Saturday, January 25, 2025.He further emphasized, “It’s not true,” when asked to confirm the rumors.The KPK’s search of Djan Faridz’s house has raised questions about his potential involvement in the case. While the exact role of Faridz remains unclear, the investigation continues to unfold. Tessa, a spokesperson for the KPK, confirmed that the search was conducted based on witness statements. “Investigators have facts and instructions based on witness statements so that the search activity was carried out last night,” she explained.
Ronny also expressed surprise at the KPK’s recent actions, suggesting a lack of substantial evidence. ”we don’t know the search for this direction? Where do you want to look for evidence again? It means that the determination of the suspect yesterday is not enough evidence, please? We don’t know what was confiscated,” he remarked. He further insinuated the KPK’s unusual approach,stating,”I also don’t know who next week they want to search for who else,or want to call wich witness. Even those who have died are also called as witnesses.”
The case dates back to January 2020 when Harun Masiku was named a suspect in the PAW bribery case involving members of the DPR. Masiku allegedly bribed former KPU Commissioner Wahyu Setiawan. Despite being a fugitive for five years, Masiku’s whereabouts remain unknown.
Below is a summary of key developments in the case:
| Key Points | Details |
|————————————|—————————————————————————–|
| KPK Search | Djan Faridz’s house searched in connection with Harun Masiku’s bribery case |
| Hasto Kristiyanto’s Involvement| Denies renting Faridz’s house; named suspect in December 2024 |
| Harun Masiku’s Status | fugitive since January 2020; allegedly bribed Wahyu Setiawan |
As the investigation progresses, the KPK remains tight-lipped about the specifics of Djan Faridz’s involvement.”Not yet confirmed by investigators,” Tessa said when questioned about the details.
The case continues to draw public attention, with many awaiting further clarity on the roles of those implicated. For now, Hasto Kristiyanto maintains his innocence, while the KPK presses forward in its pursuit of justice.
Hasto Kristiyanto Denies Renting Djan Faridz’s House Amid KPK Inquiry
Table of Contents
In a recent growth surrounding the ongoing corruption case involving Harun Masiku, Hasto Kristiyanto, the Secretary General of the PDIP, has firmly denied allegations that he rented the house of former PPP chairperson, Djan Faridz. The house, located in Menteng, was recently searched by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) as part of their inquiry into the bribery case. We sat down with Dr. Aditya Wijaya, a legal expert specializing in anti-corruption cases, to discuss the implications of these developments.
The KPK’s search of Djan Faridz’s House
Senior Editor: Dr.Wijaya, can you explain the significance of the KPK’s decision to search Djan Faridz’s house in connection with Harun Masiku’s bribery case?
Dr. Aditya Wijaya: Certainly. The KPK’s search of Djan Faridz’s house indicates that they are expanding their investigation beyond the immediate suspects. This suggests that they may be looking for additional evidence or connections that could shed light on Harun Masiku’s activities. Given that Faridz is a prominent political figure, this move has raised eyebrows and added complexity to the case.
Hasto Kristiyanto’s Denial
senior Editor: Hasto Kristiyanto has denied renting the house in question. How credible is his denial, and what challenges do you foresee in proving or disproving this claim?
Dr. Aditya Wijaya: Hasto’s denial is a strong statement, but its credibility will depend on the evidence the KPK uncovers. Proving or disproving this claim will likely involve examining financial records, rental agreements, and witness testimonies. The challenge lies in the potential lack of direct evidence linking Hasto to the house, which could make this aspect of the investigation prolonged and contentious.
Harun Masiku’s Fugitive Status
Senior Editor: Harun Masiku has been a fugitive since January 2020. What impact does his prolonged absence have on the investigation?
Dr. Aditya Wijaya: Harun Masiku’s fugitive status significantly hampers the investigation.His absence means that critical testimonies and evidence that could only come from him are missing. This has likely forced the KPK to rely more heavily on circumstancial evidence and witness statements, which may not be as conclusive. His ongoing evasion of justice continues to be a major obstacle in resolving this case.
The Future of the Investigation
senior Editor: What are your predictions for the next steps in the KPK’s investigation, and how do you see this case unfolding in the coming months?
Dr. Aditya Wijaya: The KPK is likely to continue its methodical approach, following leads and gathering evidence meticulously. We can expect more searches, witness interviews, and possibly even more suspects being named. However,the case’s complexity and the high-profile nature of those involved mean that progress may be slow and fraught with legal challenges. Public scrutiny will remain high, and the political implications of this case will continue to be significant.
Conclusion
As the KPK’s investigation into Harun Masiku’s bribery case progresses, the involvement of figures like Djan Faridz and Hasto Kristiyanto adds layers of complexity. Hasto’s denial of renting Faridz’s house underscores the contentious nature of the case, while Masiku’s fugitive status remains a significant hurdle. With public attention firmly focused on the developments, the KPK faces the daunting task of unraveling the truth in a case that continues to dominate headlines.
