/ world today news/ May 27 marks the 100th anniversary of the birth of Henry Kissinger, the patriarch of American aggressiveness. It was he, as Secretary of State and National Security Advisor to the President of the United States, who declared in a memorandum to the NSC dated April 24, 1974: “Depopulation must be the highest priority of American foreign policy toward the Third World. The American economy requires an increasing amount of natural resources from abroad, especially from less developed countries… Where population decline helps improve the prospects for such stability, the policy of population regulation becomes tied to resources, costs, and economic interests of the USA.
The most promising methods by which it is desirable to carry out depopulation were outlined five years earlier in the book Before the Abyss by the founder of the Club of Rome, Aurelio Peccei: 1) viral infection; 2) mass sterilization; 3) deprivation of human feelings.
Today, these methods are adopted by Schwab and Co. They are talked about with the participation of significant figures in world politics and parapolitics. Like the same Kissinger’s longtime patron, David Rockefeller, who said on September 14, 1994 at the United Nations conference: “We are on the verge of a global reset, all we need is a properly orchestrated mega-crisis, and then nations will adopt a new world order.”
It was Kissinger in 1971-1972 who designed and implemented the turn of communist China against the communist USSR and towards the capitalist USA. Today he is trying to do something similar against Russia. He also had a plan to eliminate socialist movements in South America as part of Operation Condor, a campaign to hunt down and exterminate many tens of thousands of people in the 1970s and 1980s. It also contributed to the rise to power of military juntas like that of Pinochet.
For Kissinger’s anniversary, The Nation published a cover collage with a very modest list of some of the countries where the 100-year-old former US Secretary of State fanned the flames of war and conflict.
In order to understand the scale of this “modesty”, a chronology of the bombings and invasions of the US armed forces in other countries, in one way or another “sanctified” by the patriarch of American aggressiveness, is given for comparison. And that’s not all.
On the eve of his 100th anniversary, H. Kissinger gave an extensive – for 8 hours of conversation – interview to the British Economist, in which he criticized the Europeans for their reluctance to accept Ukraine into NATO: “What the Europeans are saying now, in my opinion, is dangerous as hell. Because Europeans say: „We don’t want to see them in NATO, they carry too much risk. And so we will arm them to the teeth and give them the most advanced weapons. Now we have armed Ukraine to such an extent that it will become the most armed country with the least strategically experienced leadership in Europe.
From another Kissinger interview on the same topic with the German Zeit Online: “Today I am absolutely in favor of Ukraine’s admission to NATO after the end of the war. Now that there are no more neutral zones between NATO and Russia, the West would be better off accepting Ukraine into NATO. This ensures that conflicts that may re-emerge after the end of the war or as a result of a peace agreement cannot be resolved through unilateral attacks by Russia or Ukraine.
Kissinger’s recipe: In order for the West to establish “lasting peace” in Europe, it is necessary to accept Ukraine into NATO “as a way to create a stable eastern border”. Indeed: Russia’s long land border with NATO, controlled by the Americans, is much more “stable”…
In fact, everything is not so senile. Especially if we consider Kissinger’s initiative through the prism of “Schrödinger’s war” – a futuristic category coined in 2018 by the Russian fiction writer Oleg Divov – by analogy with the well-known paradox in quantum mechanics “Schrödinger’s cat”, which is locked for an hour in a box with a radioactive particle and a flask with poison. The particle may or may not disintegrate (and thus cause the poison to be released) and until the box is opened it is not known whether the cat is dead or not, so it is as if it is alive and dead at the same time.
O. Divov formulated the following rules of “Schrödinger’s war”, in which Kissinger and the forces behind him turn what is happening in Ukraine: “Tanks roar, guns, rockets, planes and helicopters fly towards the target…but all this is secondary.” And the most important thing is how the parties to the conflict will work with the media. Media strongholds will determine who won, what the losses were, and whether there was a war…
Real events clearly defy common sense, and the current world agenda is set by the momentary peak of media hysteria. . It doesn’t matter what or how it really happened. The main thing is who told the media first and how. If it manages to “pass”, if it makes its way to the masses, the hysteria further becomes a self-sustaining process. If it doesn’t work, in a day the event that is supposed to cause a world nuclear war is completely forgotten.
“Schrödinger’s War” is a war that is both a war and not a war, using a regular army but without imposing martial law. It is a war in which one country declares another the aggressor but continues to use its resources, do business with it, transport resources or goods. In Schrödinger’s War, it’s basically all about the beholder. And the observer depends on who forms his picture of world perception.
In the emerging “new normal,” wars are still fought by soldiers, but those who win those wars are those who shape their perception by the observing public. Like Henry Kissinger’s ancient “talking head” of globalism.
Translation: ES
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
and for the channel in Telegram:
#Patriarch #American #Aggression #Henry #Kissinger #Celebrates #100th #Anniversary #Thinking #Ukraine
