/ world today news/ The vote of the ABV parliamentary group was a serious political mistake!
This is what the outgoing ABV leader Georgi Parvanov told Nova TV on the occasion of yesterday’s vote for the BGN 16 billion. debt.
I will submit /ritually-b.r./ resignation before the National Council of ABV, Parvanov added. He stated that this will be done at the next council meeting.
The decision of the parliamentary group was in spite of him /you see!?/ He apologized to the voters. He now did not believe Goranov’s words that a smaller debt than the 16 billion would be withdrawn.
The ex-president explained the behavior of his deputies with inexperience in parliamentary practices. /Bray, when did you find that out!?/
To the question – what will happen if they accept his resignation as leader of ABV, Parvanov replied: “Wonderful”. He explained that there may be a way outside of politics.
He announced his decision to resign last night to fellow party members. They did not accept this with enthusiasm and tried to dissuade him, explained Georgi Parvanov.
Amen!
#Parvanovs #ritual #suicide #View #Info
– What are the potential implications of Georgi Parvanov’s resignation for the ABV party’s future in Bulgarian politics?
Hello, and welcome to World Today News. Today, we have a special two-part interview on the recent developments in the Bulgarian political landscape. First, we have former President Georgi Parvanov, who recently resigned from his position as leader of the party. And joining him, we have a political analyst who will provide insight into the implications of this resignation.
Mr. Parvanov, you recently announced your resignation as leader of the ABV parliamentary group following a vote for a BGN 16 billion debt. Can you tell us why you believe this was a serious political mistake?
Mr. Parvanov: Yes, of course. I believe the vote for such a large debt is not in the best interests of the Bulgarians, especially when there are doubts about the size and purpose of the loan. The public has been misled about the true nature of this debt, and as a result, we have lost their trust. It is crucial for any political party to maintain the trust of its constituents, and this decision goes against that principle.
Moving on to the resignation, could you explain your thoughts behind this decision?
Mr. Parvanov: Well, I felt it was necessary to take responsibility for the actions of my party. I believed that I could no longer lead them effectively after such a significant error in judgment. Additionally, I didn’t want to be associated with this decision and continue to represent the party in such a way. It was essential for me to make a clear statement about my position and take a stand against such decisions that go against the welfare of the Bulgarian people.
Now, turning to the political analyst, what are your thoughts on Mr. Parvanov’s resignation? Do you believe it will have any significant impact on the party’s future?
Analyst: In my opinion, Mr. Parvanov’s resignation is a symbolic move more than anything else. He is trying to save face after the party’s poor performance in recent years and the negative public opinion towards them. However, the party’s future success will depend on its ability to rebrand itself and attract new members and voters. The resignation of one person, no matter how influential, is not going to change that overnight. It’s a first step towards rebuilding trust and credibility, but much more needs to be
