The latest battle on Twitter pits the president of the MR against the scientist Marc Van Ranst deemed too pessimistic, too omnipresent in the media and too weak in his arguments.
–
–
THEIt really needed that: a “battle” on Twitter between politicians and experts! The most recent opposes the president of the MR to the scientist Marc Van Ranst deemed too pessimistic, too omnipresent in the media and too weak in his arguments. Van Ranst is delighted that these policies are not virologists while the president of the Open VLD believes that the experts should not speak out on things of which they are not certain. Emmanuel André goes to the bazooka, accusing Georges-Louis Bouchez, without naming him, of “stumbling in the mud of populism”.
Two fundamental faults
You are spared the entire exchange which reveals two fundamental faults.
– .
