Parliament condemns the American veto and reiterates its condemnation of international silence and Arab failure
[Samstag, 23 November 2024 18:50:43 +0300]
Sana’a – Saba: Parliament, in its session chaired by Parliament Speaker Yahya Ali al-Rai, condemned the continued American intransigence and arrogance in the region, most recently using its veto power for the fourth time to overturn the decision to declare war against To end Gaza and the Palestinian people.
He stressed that the American objection to the decision to stop the aggression against Gaza shows the extent of the ugliness and criminality of the American government, the partner and main supporter of the continuation of the genocidal war against the civilian population in Gaza.
Parliament condemned the shameful international silence and the shameful Arab and Islamic failures in the face of the policies of hegemony, arrogance, criminality and Zionist-American intransigence towards our brothers in Palestine and Lebanon.
Parliament called on the parliaments of the world and the Arab and Islamic peoples to take effective measures and exert pressure to end the war of extermination of the criminal Zionist enemy entity against the Palestinian people, and to broadly denounce the American position, which hinders everyone international decision or effort to stop Israeli aggression and siege of the Gaza Strip.
Parliament reaffirmed Yemen’s continued strong and firm position in support of the Gaza Strip and the Palestinian and Lebanese people, as well as their brave resistance until victory is achieved and the invaders, occupiers and their tools are defeated.
The Council pointed out that America is the head of evil, crime and aggression against Gaza, Lebanon and the free peoples of the world, and called on the countries of the world and the international community to respond positively to the decision of the International Criminal Court The Hague to arrest the Zionist war criminals Netanyahu and Gallant.
Parliament noted that these positions will produce countries that will support the oppression of the Palestinian people and end their suffering under the American-British-Zionist axis of evil, and welcomed the massive public marches that took place in the capital Sanaa and the Free Yemeni governorates were observed yesterday, in solidarity under the slogan: “With Gaza and Lebanon… the blood of martyrs creates victory.”
He pointed out that the blood and sacrifices of the martyrs are the source of the strength and free will of the Yemeni people, bringing glory and victory to Yemenis and strengthening their steadfastness in the fight against the enemies of the Arab and Islamic nation.
Parliament strongly condemned the Saudi regime’s repeated and persistent insults to the Arab and Islamic nation, the most recent of which was the use of figures similar to the Holy Kaaba in organizing obscene parties in the so-called entertainment season. These acts constitute an insult and provocation to the feelings of Muslims and is an attack on their sanctity in the context of the Jewish plan to Judaize Jerusalem and control it as part of the so-called “Greater Israel” illusion project.
In Parliament, the Council discussed the report of the Services Committee on the status of the implementation of the Council’s recommendations on the completion of the Bridge Project (Wadi Sardad – Al-Kadan) in Al-Duha District, Hodeidah Governorate.
After the discussion, which took place in the presence of the Undersecretary of the Road Sector at the Ministry of Transport and Public Works, Khaled Omar Bashamakh, said the Vice President of the General Company for Roads and Bridges, Amir al-Din Muhammad al-Houthi, and a number of specialists in the relevant authorities, the government side, represented by the Deputy Chairman of the Road and Bridge Maintenance Fund, Nabil Ismail al-Muayyad, committed to implementing the following recommendations:
1- The General Organization of Roads and Bridges shall carry out the inventory work for the remaining works of the Wadi Sardad Bridge Project within a maximum period of two weeks starting from the date of compliance with this Recommendation. Al-Kaden) and liquidation with the project subcontractor for all project work to prevent any expected interference from any party at the beginning of the completion of the project implementation.
2- The Ministry of Public Works and Roads will, in the following two-week period, carry out all the assessment and approval works for the remaining inventory works of the Bridge Project (Wadi Sardad – Al-Kaden) and the liquidation works with the subcontractor of the project provided to it by the General Organization of Roads and bridges and submit the results to the Road Maintenance Fund.
3- During the following two-week period, the Road Maintenance Fund will inspect the inventory works and remaining quantities of the Bridge Project (Wadi Sardad – Al-Kaden) submitted to it by the Ministry of Public Works and Roads and ensure the safety and suitability of the works carried out as well as the Degree of their compliance with the specifications and determine the estimated cost of completing the project, connecting it to both ends of the asphalt road and providing the necessary funds for this.
4- Within a maximum period of (45) days from the date of commitment before the Council to implement these recommendations, begin work to complete the implementation of the Bridge Project (Wadi Sardad – Al-Kaden) and any other In the event of a delay beyond Beyond that date, the party that caused this delay shall be responsible and accountable to the Council.
5- Providing to the relevant committee a copy of all documents and reports related to the inventory, liquidation, appraisal, baptism and inspection works, as well as the estimated costs of completing the implementation of the Bridge Project (Wadi Sardad Al-Kadan) and related works .
6- Appointing the Central Authority for Control and Accounting and the Supreme Anti-Corruption Authority to examine the documents of the bridge project (Wadi Sardad Al-Kadan) and submit the results to the Council.
In addition, the Council considered the report of the special committee established by the Council on the complaint lodged by several citizens about developments and repeated attacks on their lands, as well as the separation between what belongs to the foundations and what belongs to the drafts of foundations and court decisions.
The council began the meeting by reviewing its previous minutes and approved them. He will continue his business meetings tomorrow, Sunday, God Almighty willing.
Here are 2 PAA related questions for the provided text:
This article presents a very specific viewpoint on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, heavily laden with emotionally charged language and strong accusations.
Here are some open-ended questions that encourage discussion and exploration of diverse perspectives:
**On the Conflict:**
* The article strongly condemns Israel’s actions and labels the U.S. as “the head of evil.” What are some alternative perspectives on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? How do these perspectives differ from the ones presented in the article?
* The article calls for support for the “Palestinian resistance.” What different forms of resistance exist in this context, and what are the potential consequences of each?
* The article blames the “American-British-Zionist axis” for the suffering of the Palestinian people. To what extent do you think external powers influence the conflict, and what other factors might be contributing to the situation?
**On International Response:**
* The article criticizes the international community’s silence on the conflict. What are the challenges faced by international organizations in addressing this situation? What mechanisms could be more effective in promoting peace?
* The International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for Israeli officials. How might legal action impact the conflict? What are the potential benefits and drawbacks of pursuing this course of action?
**On Domestic Politics:**
* The article connects the conflict to Yemen’s internal politics. How does the government’s stance on the conflict potentially influence support for its policies within Yemen?
**On Language and Framing:**
* The article uses strong language, such as “Zionist enemy entity,” “evil,” and “invaders.” How does this language shape the reader’s understanding of the conflict? What are the potential dangers of using such language?
* The article refers to “martyrs” and “victory.” How do these terms frame the conflict? What alternative ways of talking about the conflict might be more conducive to finding a peaceful solution?
Remember, the goal is not to agree or disagree with the article, but to critically analyze it and consider different perspectives on a complex and sensitive issue. Encourage open-minded discussion and respectful debate.
