The announcement of the joint parliamentary initiative is a matter of time SYRIZA, PASOK and Freedom of Navigation after the conclusion – “rag paper” of the Supreme Court on the wiretapping, which was revealed yesterday by documentonews.gr and some people rushed to “copy” and appropriate it.
Read more: “Fermentation” in SYRIZA, PASOK and Pleusi after the “rag paper” of the Supreme Court
According to the information, it seems that the filing of a request to summon the Deputy Prosecutor of the Supreme Court, Achillea Zisi, and the Prosecutor of the Supreme Court, Georgia Adeilinis, to the Institutions and Transparency Committee in order to state their reasoning, as recorded in the conclusion 300 pages on the wiretapping scandal.
Zoi Konstantopoulou was the first to formulate this proposal yesterday in the Plenary, requesting that the conclusion and the entire case file be forwarded to the Committee in question. “The proposal of Sailing Freedom, now that it has been completed and it is pompously announced that there is also a conclusion, is to convene the Institutions and Transparency Committee of the Parliamenthe said and added:
“That all the documents of the preliminary examination and the conclusion be forwarded to it by the prosecution of the Supreme Court and that it hold a meeting because there is a very clear problem in the democratic functioning and in the transparency in the functioning of the institutions in the country which unfortunately also involves the judiciary”.
It is recalled that yesterday S. Famellos and N. Androulakis met in the peristyle of the Parliament, which laid the groundwork for the adoption of the thinking of the president of Freedom Movement by both SYRIZA and PASOK.
What does the Regulation provide?
According to the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament, in the Committee on Institutions and Transparency “hearings of persons are mandatory only if requested by two-fifths (2/5) of the members of the committee”. That is, after an institutional person has been summoned by the minority, while Article 43A provides:
“The committee can summon state officials to a hearing, as well as any public person for issues related to the functioning of institutions and transparency, whose attendance is mandatory. The committee can summon to a hearing the president and vice-presidents of the Council of State, the Supreme Court and the Court of Audit, the prosecutor of the Supreme Court, the general commissioner of the State Court of Audit and the general commissioner of the administrative courts for matters concerning on 55 operational issues of justice for the purpose of enhancing transparency”.
The denial of ND and Hatzidakis disgust
As documentonews.gr noted, the coalition does not intend to give the “green” light, under the pretext that a judicial official cannot be summoned to explain his actions, as this would constitute a violation of the separation of powers.
However, an aversion by Kostis Hatzidakis (or according to EYP 5046c) can change the facts. The watched minister emphasized many times that he is not abandoning the legal means at his disposal for the wiretapping case, while he meaningfully added to the questions regarding the conclusion that the competent prosecutors can be summoned to the Institutions and Transparency Committee.
Will Costas Tasoulas and the chairman of the Commission, Ath. Boura, bypass the statement of Mr. Hatzidakis? Unless there is a case that the minister does not know the Parliament’s Rules of Procedure!
#Parliament #joint #initiative #SYRIZA #PASOK #Plefsis #submitted #rag #paper #Supreme #Court
