The Khon Kaen Provincial Court sentenced “Ae-Parina” to 16 months in prison, suspended for two years, fined 80,000 baht and paid 100,000 baht in compensation for insulting the “principal”, the leader of the Khon Kaen clan.
On November 30, 2022 at 9:30 am, reporters reported that Khon Kaen Provincial Court He made an appointment to read the verdict of Black Case No. 998/63 between the plaintiff, Mr. Atthaphon Buapat or the head teacher, the leader of the Khon Kaen group, together with Ms. Parina Kraikup, a former MP from Ratchaburi. Palang Pracharat party for defamation by advertising From the fact that Ms. Parena posted a photo while filing the complaint at Photharam Police Station, Ratchaburi Province along with a Facebook message that Today, come prosecute the principal or Mr. Atthaphon Buapat, incitement, sedition and revenge against the king according to section 112, together with hashtags. #Don’t cross out 112 #Malicious homicide is illegal. Since November 23, Ms Parina has been traveling with Mr Sira Jenjaka, a former MP from Bangkok, People’s Power Party and a lawyer as soon as she arrived to report. Immediately in courtroom 3, while the plaintiff only brought a lawyer to hear the verdict of the court.
from Khon Kaen Provincial Court It took about an hour to read the verdict before the defendant’s lawyer took Ms. Pareena and Mr. Sira comes right back Without giving any interviews to the press, while Mr. Sira only said that he came to support Ms Pareena.
On the side of Mr. Atthaphon Buapat or the head teacher, the leader of the Khon Kaen group together said that the Khon Kaen court had a verdict. On charges of defamation with two counts of advertising because Ms. Pareena posted two messages, she was sentenced to 8 months’ imprisonment on charges, guilty twice, a total of 16 months, suspended 2 years’ imprisonment it’s an order. , pay compensation of 100,000 baht and interest, pay the court and legal costs of 20,000 baht, and order the publication of apology notices in 2 newspapers for 3 consecutive days.
according to the fight process in court which since it was done I wish that was the right I should have had. Which, if effectively contestable, asks the judge to consider the issue of publication in the newspaper for longer. Because I was treated, it brought great shame to my reputation,” said Mr. Auttapol.
