Director, Dogma 95 advocate, Oscar winner: Thomas Vinterberg.
Photo: Chris Pizzello / EPA
–
Actors who play drunks rarely come across as believable. How did you solve the problem, with real alcohol for the actors?
The actors didn’t drink alcohol while shooting – I don’t know what they did in the caravan during the breaks (laughs). You wouldn’t get through a twelve-hour day of filming if you were drunk. Playing a drunk guy means hard work and a lot of research:
“We watched a lot of Russian videos on Youtube.”
Up to a certain alcohol level, the point is to hide the drunkenness and to pretend to be sober: You move very precisely. More alcohol makes things difficult, then movement becomes a tragic ballet.
For a happy ending, Mads Mikkelsen is allowed to show what he once learned at dance school. How did this happy conclusion come about?
You get things like that as a bonus when you write roles for people you know well. For this reason, I almost always write my characters with familiar actors in the background. With Mads, I knew about his dancer’s past and I wanted to show how his character literally freed itself with this dance.
Dancing instead of drinking, would that be the message of the film for you?
I have no message! But my own lesson would be: Allow the uncontrollable in life! Falling in love or developing ideas works better without control. One should dare more risk and curiosity in life.
Not only your film heroes succeed in this risk, especially with alcohol …
That’s right, I wanted to explore this phenomenon in the film. Let’s do a thought experiment: What if God had created the world without alcohol? I’m sure we would have found another way to the uncontrollable.
What would have happened if your characters had kept to the 0.5-alcohol limit. At this level, weren’t they actually much better?
I’ve learned that alcohol comes in phases. In level 1, the person becomes an exceptionally winged version of themselves. In level 2, you have to drink to be yourself again. Because now you are a lousy version of yourself and need alcohol to return to your original state. The transition from phase 1 to 2 happens imperceptibly. Finally, in stage 3 there are physical problems if one does not drink. That’s why I recommend staying at level one. If you are honest with yourself, you will see how close you are to level 2: You need your wine with your meal in order to be less in a bad mood. Or you drink your bottle of red every evening. This is where you should stop, and do so for a long time. This is the only way to get back to level 1.
The intoxication – the short discussion of our film critic Regina Grüter
Unfortunately not much more than good mood cinema
Four high school teacher friends celebrate in the restaurant. Martin (Mads Mikkelsen) is dejected. He’s become a bore. Nikolaj, who teaches psychology, brings the theory of a Norwegian psychiatrist into play: If you drink sensibly, it increases self-confidence and life is more fun. The four want to test the theory in practice and examine the effects on professional and psychosocial skills. The idea was neither sober nor drunk. Soon 0.5 per mille is no longer enough, and the whole experimental set-up gets out of hand.
The idea is great! It’s about loss of control, says Thomas Vinterberg. There is no trace of this in the very conventional cinematic implementation. Vinterberg is not looking for new forms – the advocate of the “Dogma 95” manifesto still does not believe in alienation from reality. Not really of dramaturgical predictability either; but he cannot redeem that. One can confidently call «Drunk» a good mood film, which is not a bad thing. What does he mean by that? Maybe: You can also celebrate and be exuberant. So drink up guys! But please controlled.
Movie trailers and information
«Drunk» (DK 2020, 117 Min.); Director: Thomas Vinterberg; in the cinema from Thursday
—
Trailer «Drunk».
What: Youtube
—
–