Home » today » Technology » Online there is a lot of talk about Humane AI Pin and Rabbit R1

Online there is a lot of talk about Humane AI Pin and Rabbit R1

These are products that we will never see in Italy (except in very small quantities), but for once we can be happy instead of sorry. Because, judging by what we read (and see) on the Internet, Humane AI Pin and Rabbit R1 are two mediocre products.

Introduce yourself at the beginning of the year as “the devices that will replace smartphones”the next-big-thing in the world of technology, are both personal assistants wearables equipped with artificial intelligence. However, they do not work as promised, as they should and as one would expect given what they cost.

Artificial intelligence

We tried Perplexity AI, the search engine that wants to challenge Google

by Emanuele Capone


reddit: Rabbit R1’s embarrassing lie to MKBHD

Humane AI Pin “doesn’t work half the time”

Four months later, with the first deliveries to the first customers, the time has come for a reality bath which concerned first of all Humane’s AI Pin, one very expensive pin ($700, plus a mandatory $24 per month subscription) which should respond to voice commands, see the world around you and talk about it, allow you to make phone calls and much more. Except that “half the time it doesn’t work” and “even when it does work it’s exasperatingly slow”, like wrote colleagues of The Verge in the reviewgiving it a solid 4 out of 10.

YouTuber MKBHD, who had already inflicted a shot probably fatale a Fiskerdid even worse: in his video, which collected almost 7 million views in a couple of weeks, he talked about the “worst product I’ve tried in my career” and openly not recommended to buy it. Simply because AI Pin is not yet ready to do what it was promised it would do.

Strong, very strong doubts about both devices have been raised by many other specialized sites and other YouTubers, including the Canadian Dave2D, who twice dealt with both the AI ​​Pin and the R1, reaching define them as “bordering on fraud” and reiterating that even if they worked they wouldn’t do anything more than what a smartphone already does. And that at most “they could be an app”.

A hardware problem, rather than a software one

But what are the main defects of the two devices, found in the reviews that you can read and see online? Besides the fact that they don’t work as they should, of course. There are problems at the software level, in the sense that the AI ​​with which they are equipped do not give satisfactory answers, they lie openly and embarrassingly and above all they are not able to do what was promised and shown in the promotional videos, simply because at moment they do not have access to some user data and have no connection with the smartphone in which this data is stored.

But more than anything there seem to be problems at the hardware level, in how they are made: the R1 has one battery that lasts 60-90 minutes and then it turns off, an uncomfortable interface that sometimes is touch and sometimes not and a plasticky and somewhat cheap construction; the AI ​​Pin overheats often (and is deactivated to protect itself) and is equipped with a projector that is practically unreadable from the outside. All this despite the fact that, we reiterate, they cost 200 and 700 dollars respectively.

Future

How AI Pin works, the pin with artificial intelligence that will (not) replace the smartphone

by our correspondent Bruno Ruffilli



youtube: Dave2D sul Rabbit R1

Why so much hurry?

The feeling is that both devices have been put up for sale too hastily, after a convincing advertising campaign capable of attracting a lot of attention and consensus. And so the question arises spontaneously: why? Why not wait another 2-3 months and maybe refine them better, both in terms of software both of hardware?

There is no official answer, but there are some hypotheses that can be done, that Dave2D has done in his videos and that we feel like sharing: the rush is linked to the fear of what Apple and Google could do. Let’s explain: there is already the (strong) feeling that smartphones can easily do what AI Pin and R1 do and that the only thing that distinguishes them from a phone is the integration of an AI within them. AI which, however, does not have access to some fundamental user data to be able to actually help. In order to truly be a personal assistant: as of today, he cannot book a holiday, buy a book on Amazon or buy a pair of shoes online (as was shown in some promotional videos), simply because he does not have access to credit card data. Which instead are on the smartphone and to which both Apple and Google have access.

And what will happen in the space of less than a month, when during the I/O and WWDC events, first Google and then Apple will perhaps announce their new AIs or even the integration of their existing AIs into Android and iOS? That these products will become useless, because all the things they (theoretically) do they can be done better, even with the voice, through the smartphone that people have in their hands every day. Which continues to confirm itself as the most useful and effective object to allow communication between us and the Internet.

@capoema


#Online #lot #talk #Humane #Pin #Rabbit
– 2024-04-30 13:20:47

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.