In a call on the 4th, Chairman Kim said, “Amnesty is a problem that ends when the president decides and decides because pardon is the president’s own authority,” and “it is not complicated.” This position is expected to be more concrete at the non-confrontation meeting scheduled for this morning.
The power of the people did not come up with a different position for three days after Lee’s amnesty came out on the 1st. On December 15 last year, if Chairman Kim has already apologized for the mistakes of the two former presidents, and he prematurely reveals his position, the authenticity may be questioned, and even the move to expand the extension in the middle could take a brake.
Meanwhile, the conflict amplified within the Democratic Party. President Moon’s supporters and members of the “Quin-moon” repeatedly criticized Lee and clarified the opposition to the “pardon”. As the controversy grew, the Democratic Party leadership, which held an emergency meeting at the National Assembly the afternoon before, agreed that public consensus and reflection of the parties are important. At the same time, President Moon decided to refrain from commenting until the New Year’s press conference in the middle of this month, when he is expected to reveal his position. When the Democratic Party mentioned the amnesty on the premise of reflection, the people’s power was strongly criticized. In a message to reporters, spokesman Bae Joon-young said, “Is it normal to see the Democratic Party that lightly regards the issue of pardons of former presidents as feathers?” “The happenings related to the amnesty are not the appearance of a responsible ruling party. It makes me doubt where the Democratic Party is really at the center of it.”
Rep. Je-won Jang also said on Facebook, “I picked up horses in less than 48 hours, so I can’t get rid of the ridiculous feeling.” “You should know that Lee’s words in the future even if you picked meju with soybeans did not believe.” Raised the day.
While the amnesty that the passport first raised in the face of conflict and confusion between the opposition parties, Chairman Kim pointed out the president’s irresponsibility and silence.
Chairman Kim criticized, “I can’t understand where the President is strangely bringing up the story through Lee Nak-yeon’s mouth,” he said.
Chairman Kim interpreted his distancing from the amnesty theory, saying that “a pardon is the decision of President Moon,” but the political world interprets his intention as emphasizing the fact that the president’s decision is necessary.
Chairman Kim is in a position that this amnesty is separate from the apology for the affairs involving the two former presidents. In the call, he said, “(The details of the last emergency press conference) are separate.”
On the other hand, according to the Amnesty Act, the Amnesty Review Committee (evaluation committee) consisting of 9 internal and external members, including the Minister of Justice and Vice Minister of Justice, the Director of the Prosecutors’ Office, and attorneys from prosecutors and judges, decided the candidates for special pardon through discussion, and then the Minister of Justice, the chairman, Report to the President. The President determines the target person after deliberation and resolution by the State Council.
The public opinion is that the pardon is not difficult as long as Moon’s statement of position is concerned, considering not only the current Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae, who is a pro-moon, but also the candidates, Rep. Park Bum-gye, Vice Minister of Justice Lee Yong-gu, and Prosecutors’ Office Chief Shim Jae-cheol.
(Seoul = News 1)
Copyright by dongA.com All rights reserved.
—
–
