Photo I Weverse Magazine
Weverse Magazine apologized for the controversy surrounding the ‘Hive Idol Evaluation Internal Report’ and announced that the former editor-in-chief who wrote the document was relieved of his position.
On the 10th, Weverse Magazine (hereafter referred to as Weverse) posted an apology on its official website, saying, “We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience and inconvenience caused to users -use as a result of the situation arising from the study document. “
Weverse said, “That document was produced by the former editor-in-chief as a separate work, and members of Weverse Magazine were not aware of the document’s existence.” “I also did not participate in its preparation the document search,” he explained.
It continued, “The former editor-in-chief has been immediately relieved of his position and prohibited from any involvement in the work of Weverse Magazine, and the individual employees have been terminated the former editor-in-chief asked to do an investigation. ” He said, “Weverse Magazine is not associated with the controversial investigation document, and the above” Bus Magazine clearly states that they are against the document,” he said.
In addition, “Nonetheless, we apologize again for being mentioned in an unpleasant case and for causing inconvenience to users. Weverse Magazine promises to reward readers with deeper and richer content in the future,” he said.
Previously, on the 24th of last month, a document written by the former editor-in-chief of Weverse Magazine was released during the investigation by the National Assembly’s Committee on Culture, Sports and Tourism, causing an uproar as it contained criticism and hatred the document. of idols of other companies.
This is the Weverse Magazine team.
We are sorry to apologize to those who care about Weverse Magazine for any inconvenience or concern that their use may cause as a result of the situation that occurred as a result of the study document.
I would like to state plain facts about the matter.
· This document was published by the former editor-in-chief as a separate work, and members of Weverse Magazine were not aware of the document’s existence.
· Other than the previous editor, none of the members or outside writers involved in the production of Weverse Magazine participated in the creation of the research document.
· The former editor-in-chief was relieved of his position and ordered not to be involved in any work of Weverse Magazine. Employees who were asked by the former editor-in-chief for investigative work also stopped working.
Weverse Magazine has nothing to do with the controversial research paper, and the members of Iris Weverse clearly state that they oppose the document.
Nevertheless, we are sorry again for being mentioned in an unpleasant case and for causing inconvenience when using it.
Weverse Magazine promises to reward readers with deeper and richer content in the future.
