/ world as we speak information/ I’m rigorously studying the interview given by Stefan Danailov to Valeria Veleva’s “Epicenter”. I feel why it’s not in entrance of the newspaper “Duma” or on “Free Bulgarian TV”, however this can be a element that definitely impacts the dialog. When studying, I usually marvel which solutions belong to whom.
The interview is devoted to the BSP and, particularly, to the so-called inside opposition of Cornelia Ninova and the congress on 16.06.2019. The dialog is carried out in “you”, because the writer of “Po patofi” is aware of how. She says about Stefan Danailov – “a flag and an emblem, a favourite of the BSP”. I settle for that these definitions are influenced by the looks and expertise of the artist, and never a lot by his political look. Veleva on a regular basis passes the ball to Danailov purposefully – the questions indicate and are contained in a big a part of the solutions. Instigate it!
Parvanov and Stanishev are in sin; Yoncheva sank along with her habits and that is the way you undergo Gergov, Yankov, Dubov, Mikov, Aslanov, Zablyanov, Kutev, Pirinski – father and daughter!!! With quite a lot of negativity, personalities within the BSP are mentioned maliciously. Whose place is that? Danailov is Ninova’s deputy, this opinion, torn out due to the scenario by which the get together fell, burned by the election end result, does it actually assist the group or save the chief from duty? Such a way of dialog is clearly not alien to each of them. They speak to one another “in a feminine means”, with understanding. What performs the function of a banana peel within the dialog is the means by which the “oppositionists” are described. One lied, one other abused, a 3rd had a need in one other discipline, a fourth was discredited and authoritarian, a fifth solely took… “Males hate a girl a lot.” The phrase “hate” must be used, which is an absolute perversion, as a result of it’s simply confirmed that every one who’ve variations with Nineveh haven’t expressed emotions. Neither Veleva nor Danailov can level to proof of hatred between individuals, because the “icon” says, swimming in the identical boat, the tonnage of which I’ve no information on. Hate escalates to “fratricidal conflict”! Proof – zero!
I rigorously learn the interview. Danailov doesn’t present that he feels the place Veleva is main him. He does not perceive that even at a mature age an individual can change into a rascal. It is a pity, he does not bear in mind his personal phrases, which is straightforward to whisper to him, however I am removed from the mentality of the questioner. I respect the expertise of the artist, however I don’t settle for his political assessments and judgments, as a result of I feel that deep down Danailov is aware of what he’s speaking about.
An important intrigue revolved round Nineveh. Is she baseless, is there intrigue or details of her being? On this event, the phrase that whoever sows rain reaps storms applies right here!
In accordance with Danailov, Ninova is continually shaken by emotion; it’s extra crucial; begin the engine; exhibits stubbornness; Nineveh opens many fronts; it’s important who she surrounds herself with; the youth within the parliamentary group are usually not politicians; the absence of Stoilov and Ovcharov is felt; the exit from the Nationwide Meeting of the parliamentary group is a mistake; gave an excessive amount of belief to Yoncheva, who didn’t present any political thought; Stanishev ought to have been in an elective place, as a result of he’s the one critical, politically talking particular person whom Danailov personally congratulates; the marketing campaign lacks a optimistic European perspective; Borisov brilliantly performed these elections;
If the negatives expressed by Danailov concerning the girl with “character” are collected, the declarations that the 2 of them with Veleva need to counsel concerning the usefulness of Ninova stay hanging.
-
Ninova is hiding one thing to protect the picture of the get together and there are monetary violations within the get together!?
-
Ninova led a mass of individuals, straightened the get together, raised vanity;
-
She stored her promise of left-wing TV;
-
Ninova is an ethical particular person, a born chief, she is sort of a tank!
I agree that there is no such thing as a particular person fully in white, however the BSP get together will not be its chairman and the chairman will not be BSP! Because of this, I discover that there’s quite a lot of hysteria and untruths within the interview, that are utilized by individuals of a sure high quality. It’s prophesied.
-
There are congressional threats to not assist Nineveh;
-
30-40 individuals who hate Nineveh need joint governance with GERB;
-
The opposition will go loopy, horrible intrigues, the get together will see a miracle;
-
The BSP is a celebration with a thirst for revenge towards its leaders, a celebration of cannibals – (the definition was Lukanov’s, shared with Veleva!)
-
Energy is an “abomination”, a merciless factor, if you do not have a put up, you are nothing?!
-
BSP is a sophisticated get together, however we do not have Boyko Borisov!!!
On the very finish, Danailov appeared to seek out himself, and carried out a skit for the congress, which proved his inventive talents. He states – “I’m not leaving the BSP who needs to go away!”
Draw your conclusions. There are individuals who need the congress to not elevate vital points associated to the political presentation of the BSP, its organizational standing, membership and management strategies. Let’s hope that the work of the congress doesn’t go down the highway of interpersonal relations and doesn’t fall beneath misunderstandings and theatrical performances. Could collective sanity prevail!
#event #Stefan #Danailovs #interview #BSP #congress
