Prospect Seok-Jun Oh, Supreme Court docket Justice. Great information.
The hearing of Supreme Court Justice Oh Seok-jun, who has been appointed 1st Supreme Court docket Justice of the Yoon Seok-yeol Administration, will be held on the 28th. At the hearing, the close marriage in between prospect Oh and President Yoon Seok-yeol and tendencies in past judgments arise as critical problems.
Seok-Jun Oh “I attended the former member’s wedding, but hardly ever achieved Kun-Hee Kim and Hak-Kwan Yoon.”
Very good information
The Democratic Bash of Korea is likely to start an offensive on the shut relationship amongst prospect Oh and President Yoon. Applicant Oh is a graduate of Seoul National College Regulation Department, class 84, and is a calendar year younger than President Yoon’s personal school. Candidate Oh mentioned in a composed response to the National Assembly: “I’m not specifically close to the president.” He mentioned, “We had regarded just about every other for a yr in faculty, so we understood each and every other even though learning in the library.
However, from the institution of the Special Prosecutor’s Business office in December 2016 to soon just before staying appointed Lawyer Typical in July 2019, he claimed: “I remember assembly with President Yoon two or a few times. I can not,” he stated. He additional: “I have not satisfied considering the fact that President Yoon’s appointment as Legal professional Basic in July 2019,” he included.
Candidate Oh mentioned, “I attended President Yoon’s marriage ceremony.” Nevertheless, when she was asked if she had ever achieved Kim Kun-hee other than the president, she replied, “No.” At President Yoon’s inauguration ceremony, she said, “I gained an formal invitation and attended with other Supreme Court docket judges, like the court’s head of administration and the president of the Supreme Courtroom.” She defined that there have been no phone phone calls or meetings with President Yoon or the so-identified as “Hack-Kwan Yoon” considering that this year’s presidential election.
A specifically rigid normal for the weak? “We need to have to absolutely assess other judgments.”
Superior information
There seems to be an onslaught of opposition parties on Oh’s past rulings as perfectly. Candidate Oh ruled that the Susu Bus Company’s arrangement, which fired a bus driver who had worked for 17 several years, was justified in 2011 for embezzling 800 received of transportation earnings. In 2013 it was resolved to overturn the punishment (dismissal) of a prosecutor who acquired entertainment truly worth 850,000 won by a law firm, stating that the level of disciplinary motion (dismissal) was severe. Opposition parties criticized him as “a individual with an unfair judgment and outdated values”.
Candidate Oh’s facet discussed: “Given the labor administration agreement that there is no place for disciplinary motion other than dismissal, no matter how huge or tiny the amount of money of revenue stolen from the proceeds of transportation,” he mentioned. described the decision to approve the dismissal of the bus driver. Relating to the prosecutor’s selection to terminate his dismissal, “According to the disciplinary motion procedures of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Business office at the time ahead of the enforcement of the law on poor grafting, even if it is acknowledged a work relationship, any bribery or amusement among 100,000 won and considerably less than 1 million received could be topic to disciplinary action ranging from reprimand to suspension. It was also unclear regardless of whether the reception of enjoyment at the time was associated to work “.
Candidate Oh really should react to the opposition’s offensive by stressing that he has also introduced a variety of judgments to guard the socially disadvantaged and minorities. The ruling presented by Candidate Oh’s aspect was △ the Seoul Administrative Court docket ruling that it was unlawful to refuse to offer social welfare products and services to people with disabilities just simply because she was not a recipient of primary livelihoods (Convicted January 28, 2011) The decision of the Seoul Administrative Court docket, which uncovered the unilateral dismissal of a broadcasting company unfair (judgment of 8 October 2010), and the determination of the Seoul Administrative Court docket (made a decision on 12 August 2011) which observed that the dismissal of a male manager who he experienced sexually harassed on the occupation was justified.
“You can ask for facts or files from the court, judges and investigative businesses linked to the investigation.”
The judges, like Yoo Nam-seok, president of the Constitutional Courtroom, sit in the “open up debates on the case of the death penalty of constitutional appeals” held in the Supreme Courtroom of the Constitutional Court docket. Reporter Park Jong-min
He also expressed his posture on difficulties that are turning out to be social concerns. About the demise penalty, he mentioned: “I individually do not assistance the dying penalty, and if the dying penalty has by now been carried out, even if there is an mistake, it is irreversible. Pertaining to the controversy around the existence of the stability regulation countrywide, said: “It is an space where legislative choices will have to be produced by the Nationwide Assembly that displays the will of the folks.”
With regards to the abortion criminal offense abortion, he explained: “The Constitutional Court has a short while ago taken a decision inconsistent with the structure on the scope of abortion, etc., so it should be highly regarded.” ideal to make selections and ideal to daily life of the fetus “. Relating to the decrease age restrict for accelerated minors, he reported: “I imagine there is anything to pay attention to”, but “If we reduce (the age of criminal responsibility) all at once, there is a threat that even the boys difficult to consider to have a serious obligation will be punished criminally. I think the aspect effects can be huge “. “In the end, it’s about preventing and avoiding juvenile crime, which is a part that can be reached with more than enough schooling and coaching for young children,” she mentioned.
Concerning the dispute more than the neutralization of the regulation as a result of the DPR, such as the institution of a law enforcement station and the group for the management of staff info, as nicely as the govt get of the “Inspector’s Uniform” of the Ministry of Justice (restoration prosecutor’s investigation) in reaction to the assessment He will do so, “he claimed in a principled place. Regarding the act of a prosecutor commonly delivering the Court’s Administration Workplace with information and facts about the contents of an investigation in opposition to a choose, it is said that “in accordance with the judicial disciplinary regulation, the court docket may perhaps look into the points or ask for the submission of files to community institutions for investigations into the disciplinary motion of judges” I feel that the investigative agency may well offer suitable info in the context of necessity and relevance without hindering investigative perform, “he claimed. Regardless of regardless of whether he was knowledgeable of Lawyer Normal Lee Won-seok’s disclosure of investigative techniques controversy, he drew a line stating, “It is not proper to express an belief on a certain circumstance.”
–
