Home » World » Official: Biden agrees to give Ukraine anti-personnel mines

Official: Biden agrees to give Ukraine anti-personnel mines

<div id="firstBodyDiv" data-bind-html-content-type="article" data-bind-html-compile="article.body" data-first-article-body="

The official said that the United States expects Ukraine to use mines on its territory, explaining that they have promised not to use them in areas where civilians live.

The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said that the United States had supplied Ukraine with anti-tank mines during its war with Russia, but that anti-personnel mines were expected to slow down the advance of Russian ground forces.

The official said that American mines differ from Russian mines in that they are “non-permanent” and are inactive after a predetermined period of time.

These mines require a battery to explode, and will not explode once the battery runs out.

On Tuesday, Ukraine used American Atakms missiles to strike Russian territory, taking advantage of an authorization recently granted by the outgoing administration of President Joe Biden. the thousandth day of the war.

Moscow said the deployment of Atakums, the longest-range missiles that Washington has given Ukraine so far, was a clear sign that the West wanted to escalate the conflict.

Also on Tuesday, Russian President Vladimir Putin lowered the threshold requirements for launching a nuclear strike in response to a wide range of current attacks.

The move came months after Moscow warned the West that if Washington allowed Ukraine to launch American, British and French missiles deep into Russia, Russia would consider the member states NATO that was directly involved in the war in Ukraine.

“>

The official said that the United States expects Ukraine to use mines on its territory, explaining that they have promised not to use them in areas where civilians live.

The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said that the United States had supplied Ukraine with anti-tank mines during its war with Russia, but that anti-personnel mines were expected to slow the advance of Russian ground forces.

The official said that American mines differ from Russian mines in that they are “non-permanent” and are inactive after a predetermined period of time.

These mines require a battery to explode, and will not explode once the battery runs out.

On Tuesday, Ukraine used American Atakms missiles to strike Russian territory, taking advantage of an authorization recently granted by the outgoing administration of President Joe Biden. the thousandth day of the war.

Moscow said the deployment of Atakums, the longest-range missiles that Washington has given Ukraine so far, was a clear sign that the West wanted to escalate the conflict.

Also on Tuesday, Russian President Vladimir Putin eased the restrictive requirements for launching a nuclear strike in response to a wide range of current attacks.

The move came months after Moscow warned the West that if Washington allowed Ukraine to launch American, British and French missiles deep into Russia, Russia would consider the member states NATO that was directly involved in the war in Ukraine.

#Official #Biden #agrees #give #Ukraine #antipersonnel #mines
2024-11-20 04:51:00
Sure, I can help you with⁤ that! Here are some potential interview questions based ‌on ‌the key topics in the article:

1. Can you explain why ⁢the United ​States has provided anti-tank and‌ anti-personnel mines to Ukraine? What role do‌ these​ weapons play in the current conflict?

2. How do American-made⁢ mines differ from Russian mines ‌in terms ​of ⁤their functionality ‍and ⁤effectiveness?

3. ‌What assurances have been made⁤ by the Ukrainian government regarding the‍ use of ⁣mines in ⁣populated areas?‌ What‌ precautions are being taken to minimize civilian⁤ casualties?

4. In what ways do‌ you ⁤think the recent authorization to use longer-range ‍missiles⁣ has impacted the⁤ dynamics of the conflict? Has it changed ⁤the strategic landscape for both Ukraine and Russia?

5.⁤ How do you see⁣ the potential​ for escalation increasing as a result of the deployment of American-made‍ missiles by Ukraine?‌ What risks does this ‍pose for the region and the international community?

6. How has the decision ‍to lower the threshold for nuclear strikes in Russia affected the overall tone and tenor of the war? What‍ are the possible implications of this move for future negotiations and conflict⁢ resolution efforts?

7. Should the United States continue providing‍ military assistance to Ukraine, ​including⁤ potentially more‍ advanced weapons systems like missiles and mines? Why or ⁢why not?

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.