The information that former Prime Minister Antonis Samaras is asking the Greek judiciary to disclose the small print of the protected witnesses who testified within the much-lauded Novartis case could have exploded like a bomb within the newsrooms on Tuesday, nevertheless, the fact is that Antonis Samaras has already obtain the Justice’s response to his request.
Particularly, in accordance with an excerpt of decree 25/2022 of the Judicial Council of the Supreme Particular Courtroom out there to documentonews.gr, the grievance of the previous prime minister that “their classification as “protected individuals” was unlawful from the start”, has already been rejected for about two years. Clearly, the choice can’t be legally overturned.
Particularly, the desire 25/2022 states: “The allegation that they have been illegally designated as public curiosity witnesses as a result of they count on the identical profit from their statements to the US judicial authorities is rejected. It’s because the existence of any financial profit itself underneath the authorized regime of the USA doesn’t prohibit their above characterization by the corruption prosecution in Greecesince their profit – a sum of cash, which they acquired or will obtain from the US authorities, doesn’t require their deposit in Greece, i.e. the deposits within the US and in Greece are usually not causally linked and consequently their deposit within the US isn’t makes them unsophisticated witnesses in Greece”.
It’s famous that in accordance with immediately’s announcement issued immediately Tuesday by the previous prime minister’s workplace, on June 27 he submitted to the Monetary Crimes Prosecutor an software in accordance with article 79 of Regulation 5090/2024 and article 218 paragraph 7 of the Felony Code for the disclosure of the identification of the “protected” witnesses with the code names “MAXIMOS SARAFIS” and “AKATERINI KELESI” within the Novartis case.
Together with his software, he requested the declassification of the above witnesses as witnesses of public curiosity, the elimination of their safety and the withdrawal of his conviction in opposition to them for false testimony and slanderous defamation.
The announcement additionally states: “Moreover, following the above software, a supplementary memorandum was submitted, following the revelations within the Parliament in regards to the assortment of a financial payment from their lawyer, which reinforces the idea that the above witnesses acquired a big sum of money for his or her testimony. It thus turns into apparent that their characterization as “protected” was unlawful from the start.” It’s clear, nevertheless, that this very argument was answered negatively in 2022 by the Judicial Council of the Supreme Particular Courtroom.
Apparently, the authorized advisors of Antonis Samaras are nicely conscious of the above determination, in addition to the truth that it can’t be overturned, which exhibits that the focusing on of the previous prime minister was not a lot authorized, however… political in nature.
Shortly after the fierce assault he launched in direction of Kyriakos Mitsotakis on the Conflict Museum, plainly Antonis Samaras is escalating his angle, in an try to emerge because the polar reverse to Kyriakos Mitsotakis inside the ND. Particularly, plainly he goals to squeeze Kyriakos Mitsotakis as info signifies {that a} ND minister is among the many individuals who had requested to testify on the case.
Learn additionally:
Novartis scandal: Samaras requires the identification of protected witnesses to be revealed
#Novartis #scandal #Greek #justice #rejected #comparable #request #Samaras #reveal #protected #witnesses
