Northwestern University Fires Head Football Coach Pat Fitzgerald After Widespread Hazing Investigation
Northwestern University has made the decision to fire Pat Fitzgerald, the longtime head football coach, following an investigation that revealed his players’ involvement in widespread hazing practices. The investigation uncovered disturbing allegations, including forced nudity and sexualized acts.
Just three days prior to his termination, the university had announced that Fitzgerald would be suspended for two weeks without pay after the investigation found the hazing allegations to be credible. However, after a thorough evaluation and discussions with various stakeholders, including the board of trustees, students, alumni, and Fitzgerald himself, the decision was made to part ways with the coach.
Michael Schill, the president of Northwestern, released a statement explaining the difficult and complex evaluation process that led to Fitzgerald’s firing. Schill emphasized that the decision to suspend Fitzgerald initially and ultimately terminate his employment was his alone.
The firing came after The Daily Northwestern published an article on Saturday, in which an anonymous player accused teammates of subjecting mainly freshmen to a sexual act that involved approximately 10 individuals restraining a younger player. The same publication also reported on Monday that three former football players had spoken out about a racist culture within the football program.
Fitzgerald, an alumnus of Northwestern who played linebacker during his undergraduate years, has not yet commented on the firing. His lawyer also did not respond to requests for comment. However, Fitzgerald did express his surprise at the revocation of the mutual agreement on the two-week suspension, stating that he was not given any prior notification before his employment was terminated. He mentioned that his agent and lawyer would take the necessary steps to protect his rights in accordance with the law.
The investigation into the hazing practices was conducted by Maggie Hickey of the law firm ArentFox Schiff. It was prompted by an anonymous complaint from a student-athlete in November 2022 and lasted for six months. While the investigation did not find evidence that Fitzgerald was aware of the hazing, it was well-known by many within the program, according to Schill.
The law firm’s investigation revealed that some players believed the hazing was harmless and done in jest, while others stated that it caused significant harm with long-term consequences. Schill clarified that, to his knowledge, no student suffered physical injury as a result of these behaviors.
However, Schill emphasized that as the head coach, Fitzgerald was responsible for the team culture. The investigation concluded that hazing was widespread and not a secret within the program, providing Fitzgerald with the opportunity to become aware of what was happening.
Fitzgerald had been a highly regarded figure in Northwestern’s football program. As a former player, he helped the team reach the Rose Bowl as a linebacker. Throughout his coaching career, he won five bowl games and was named the 2018 Big Ten Coach of the Year. However, last season, the team struggled, finishing with a record of 1-11.
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
What factors did Northwestern University consider in their decision to terminate Fitzgerald’s employment in response to the hazing investigation?
The hazing they experienced while playing for Northwestern University. The university immediately launched an investigation into these allegations, which ultimately led to Fitzgerald’s termination.
In response to the hazing investigation, Northwestern University initially suspended Fitzgerald for two weeks without pay. This decision was met with criticism from various stakeholders, who argued that a stronger disciplinary action was necessary. After considering the feedback from students, alumni, and the board of trustees, as well as holding discussions with Fitzgerald himself, Northwestern University decided to terminate Fitzgerald’s employment.
In a statement, Michael Schill, the president of Northwestern, emphasized the complexity of the evaluation process that led to the decision to fire Fitzgerald. Schill made it clear that he was solely responsible for the decision, taking into account all available information and input from stakeholders.
The firing came after The Daily Northwestern published an anonymous player’s account of a disturbing hazing incident, in which younger players were subjected to forced nudity and sexualized acts. Additionally, the publication reported that three former football players had come forward with their own stories of hazing within the team.
Northwestern University’s decision to terminate Fitzgerald highlights their commitment to maintaining a safe and respectful environment for all students. The university is taking a strong stance against hazing and will continue to prioritize the well-being of its students.
This is a necessary and long-overdue action. Hazing has no place in educational institutions, and it’s essential that those responsible are held accountable for their actions. It’s a step towards creating a safer and healthier environment for Northwestern’s students.