Nordio evaluates the inspectors on the migrant case in Albania after Patarnello’s email

The ministry inspectors on the Patarnello case? The Minister of Justice, Carlo Nordiohe’s thinking about it. He said it himself during question time in the Chamber of Deputies. “The matter – he explains – is being examined to verify the prerequisites for the exercise of the inspection powers that the law reserves to the Minister of Justice”. The matter in question concerns the deputy prosecutor of the Supreme Court Marco Patarnellothe magistrate who last October 19th sent the email on the ANM platform which became a political case and relaunched, in part, by the prime minister Giorgia Meloni through social media.

Nordio explains that the case “arouses considerable astonishment and as a former magistrate it also causes a certain pain”. According to the Keeper of the Seals “to state that the Prime Minister, precisely because he has no ongoing judicial investigations against him, is ‘a greater danger than that of the Honorable Berlusconi‘ and ‘we must remedy it’, a sentence of seriousness to be taken into consideration, is very indicative of the origin of this statement of the institutional climate that our democracy experiences”.

The Minister of Justice also returns to the sentence with which last Friday the Rome court did not validate the detention decree of the 12 migrants who were in Albania. That sentence, for Nordio, “is in breach of the European Court’s ruling”.

“The ruling of the Court of Justice sets three limits – explains Nordio -, in cases where the judge deems that the applicant comes from an unsafe country, or unsafe in some parts of its territory, or unsafe in relation to certain situations social, in this case the court of Rome, must justify this sentence in a comprehensive and exhaustive way”. According to the tenant of via Arenula, the court “must justify the reason why that particular person comes from a country that is not considered safe in relation to his particular associative and objective situations. This motivation must be complete, exhaustive and relevant to the case Go and read the 12 decrees of the Rome court that were printed on the same file: there is no motivation, neither complete nor exhaustive nor inherent to the concrete case regarding these individual asylum seekers”.