“Nipit Intharasombat Opposes Amending Section 112 to Protect Royal Institution”

Nipit Intharasombat, leader of the Palang Pracharat Party Post a private Facebook message stating that

Let the King not be a party to the people.
-I listened to the interview of Mr. Teeratchai Pantumas, Legal Department of the Kao Klai Party. and has the name of being the Speaker of the House of Representatives, one of them said that it was necessary to amend Section 112 because the party had previously campaigned for votes and raised several reasons for resolving Section 112, such as amending the penalty rate, amending it to be a compromising law, amending the Office of the Royal Secretariat to file complaints, and removing this matter from the category of state security.
– I have a disagreement. Almost every point of the Party is far ahead. Today, let’s put some first.
-Issues to the Office of the Royal Secretariat is a complainant I disagree that giving the royal office notify the public It brings institutions as parties directly to the people. The institute is about security. If the public sees Who damaged the institution? It is considered to undermine stability. People should have the right to report complaints. Do not let institutional agencies notify the public of the parties because the institution must rise above the conflict with the people
– Assuming that there is an offense according to Section 112 in a remote village sub-district, the Office of the Royal Traveling to inform in the sub-district, that village?
– fixing this should therefore be clear how to solve Don’t hide
– I’m not a representative with him. There is no privilege of protection for expressing opinions. That’s all you can do. But as a citizen, I still see offenses against the institution as offenses against state security. The people therefore have the right to protect the institution. Police Department/Prosecutor Will you sue? That’s another matter of fact. So I would like to ask the Kao Farai Party that he has gained power. then asked to use that power to protect the institution Making the institution a party to the people It’s not protection. in my personal opinion It even undermines and destroys the institution. therefore asked the Progressive Party to review/