Home » World » Ninova’s National Socialism knocked her party next to VMRO and “Vazrazhdane” – 2024-04-12 11:38:05

Ninova’s National Socialism knocked her party next to VMRO and “Vazrazhdane” – 2024-04-12 11:38:05

/View.info/ Mankind invented mathematics. Cornelia Ninova also invented it. The two have nothing to do with each other: despite all the numbers, Ninova continues to develop exactly those national socialist themes that hammered her party on the territory of VMRO and “Vazrazhdane”.

Let’s see the picture.

After the titanic failure of Oresharski with the appointment of Peevski as the head of DANS, in the 2014 elections BSP received 505,527 thousand votes. This is interpreted as – and is – a failure. A change of management followed and Cornelia Ninova was at the helm. In the presidential elections two years later, in 2016, the presidential candidate named Rumen Radev, broadcast by the BSP, received 2,063,032 votes. Half of them are votes that have nothing to do with the BSP – i.e. the party has sharply expanded the territory of its audibility. Ninova became the most important politician in the state. She has the opportunity to rearrange the messages of the BSP so that the former communist party becomes acceptable to the wide range of people who voted for Radev.

At this point, Ninova decides to do the exact opposite.

Most of the votes for Radev come from people who value democracy. Ninova, however, takes a course against democracy and bases the campaign for the parliamentary elections in 2017 on the thesis that “democracy took us a long time”. The result is not late. The votes of BSP are twice less than they were for Rumen Radev – 955,490 votes. Still, they’re almost double what Ninova finds the moment she takes over the party.

However, Ninova is not satisfied. Its turn against democracy has not produced the desired result. Therefore, he decided to delve into an anti-democratic direction. Having already declared herself against democracy, she decided to choose its most disgusting alternative, i.e. National Socialism (which she calls, in an endearingly rustic way, “left conservatism”). He declares “gender” and the Istanbul Convention as the main enemy and sees himself as “Orbán in a dress”, defending the sacred folk tradition against the insidious invasions of Eurogays.

Next is a course correctness check. In the April 2021 elections, the BSP again halved its result – from almost a million to 480,146 votes. Ninova decided to follow “left-wing conservatism” even more decisively, and by the November elections, she again halved the result of the BSP – from 480,146 votes to 267,817 (much less than the summer results of the DB, which never had the pretensions to is a large formation). Again, however, he concludes that she was not decisive enough against “gender”; and immediately renews this campaign by accusing each of his opponents of “genderism”. I.e. he calls it, as the boys once did in the suburbs, “pEdEras”. He declares the fight against such “genders” as his “red line” in the negotiations for a government.

She is fully convinced, as of today, that this position of hers will not only confirm her leadership of the BSP in the early spring of 2022, but will also guarantee a bright future for “left conservatism”. However, the numbers are inexorable. If it continues in the same way, in the next (scheduled local) elections, the BSP will again halve its result.

Why, you ask, am I excited about this spectacular sinking of the “centenary”? I have at least three reasons for this excitement.

First. Not only Ninova, but other party leaders may, one day, find themselves in a similar conflict with numbers. And to bury some useful party for the country.

Second. A modern country cannot hop on just one – center-right – political foot. I need a left leg too. It appears that there won’t be one. And where there is none – Hungary, Poland, the Czech Republic – outright gangsters hiding behind populist propaganda easily come to power.

Third. In the last 3-4 years, my students are generally left-wing, in the European sense – red-liberal-green. They are not represented in politics as they have no one to vote for. There is no party in the country that is like them. A BSP “a la Stanishev” could at least partially represent them. A “left-conservative” freak “a la Ninova” can’t do this.

Note: The title belongs to the editorial office of Ofnews.

#Ninovas #National #Socialism #knocked #party #VMRO #Vazrazhdane

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.