Home » today » Business » Newsweek criticized He Jinli for avoiding major issues: Democrats will suffer the consequences | Literature City

Newsweek criticized He Jinli for avoiding major issues: Democrats will suffer the consequences | Literature City

Article source: Free Times on 2024-10-20 08:41:00 – The news is taken from major news media. The news content does not represent the position of this website!

As the countdown to the U.S. presidential election begins, the election of U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris has attracted much attention. (Associated Press)

In the countdown to the 2024 U.S. election, Democratic candidate Kamala Harris has been deliberately avoiding the four issues that voters unanimously expressed their greatest concern. An editorial in the U.S. Newsweek bluntly stated: “Democrats will reap the consequences.”

This editorial was written by Josh Hammer, senior contributing editor of the magazine and host of “The Josh Hammer Show”. Hammer was forcibly elected by the Democratic Party as early as July 26 this year. After Harris became a presidential candidate, he predicted that Harris’ “stupid” and “mocking” image would “lead to serious backlash in the election.”

He wrote: “In reality, to win 270 electoral votes, you still need to win the Midwestern swing states of Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin. For Democrats, giving up a person who constantly emphasizes that he is from Scranton, Pennsylvania It’s strange to support a Californian with the most left-leaning voting record in modern history (Biden) who has a tough background (Biden).” Now, Hammer’s prediction appears to be coming true.

The article pointed out that Harris recently campaigned in Erie, Pennsylvania, which is the most important battleground state in this election. It is worth noting that current U.S. Senator Bob Casey Jr. was absent from this campaign. Harris tried to downplay Kathy’s absence, suggesting that Kathy was doing more important work, such as going door-to-door and encouraging voting. But this is clearly untenable. Facing a strong challenge from Republican candidate Dave McCormick, Casey apparently believes that Harris’s negative image as a “Bay Area leftist”, including her past support for the “Green New Deal” and a nationwide ban on fracking (page Oil extraction) and a history of stringent electric vehicle mandates are a huge liability for his candidacy.

In fact, it’s hard to blame Casey. Other Democratic incumbents facing challenges to the Senate, such as Ohio’s Sherrod Brown and Montana’s Jon Tester, earlier came to the same conclusion. This conclusion makes sense: For example, a recent Marist national election poll showed that among registered independents, Trump had a 10-point advantage over Harris. If this gap is maintained in the actual election, Trump’s probability of victory will increase significantly.

The article mentioned that Harris has recently been using what is called “projection” in the psychology community to absurdly criticize her opponent Trump for avoiding the media. In fact, Harris refused to accept any separate interviews for several weeks after Biden took over as president. In fact, Trump recently gave two interviews to TIME magazine, which is owned by an enthusiastic Harris donor. However, Harris declined the interview invitation from Time Magazine. Last week, she suddenly changed her strategy and accepted an exclusive interview with Bret Baier of Fox News. Before that, Harris was only willing to accept interviews from the most flattering media.

One has to wonder how bad internal polling results for Harris and deputy Walz would have caused her to abandon her left-leaning Call Her Daddy podcast and ABC “The View” switched to the more mainstream Beyer. Desperate times do call for desperate measures. Democrats often blast Republicans as “misogynistic,” but their own misogyny against men is so severe that Harris appears to be considering an interview with podcast king Joe Rogan, who is “woke” about the Democratic Party The agenda-skeptic style is completely inconsistent with Harris’ identity-political paranoia and overt racial political flattery.

The article goes on to point out that times make heroes, and it is truly a reversal of the tide. Excuse me, the last person left at the Harris-Walz campaign headquarters, could you please turn off the lights? Sarcasm aside, this campaign is not over yet. However, the Harris-Walz camp must be feeling uncomfortable now.

Democrats need to take responsibility for their plight. Throughout the long campaign, they have deliberately avoided the four issues that American voters unanimously expressed in polls were most concerned about: the economy, inflation, immigration and crime. Instead, they have continually tried to shift the campaign to a few issues that are favorable to them, namely abortion and the January 6 unrest at the Capitol. However, they failed completely. These four basic quality-of-life issues remain the primary concern of the American people, and they have been for many years. It is entirely their own responsibility that Democrats are so out of touch with how voters feel on these issues and that the Biden-Harris administration has performed so poorly.

At the end of the article, perhaps, if the Harris-Walz combination ultimately loses, the Democrats will pause and take a good look in the mirror. Maybe they’ll realize that promising to allow late-term abortions is a weird way to curry favor with women; that promising mass amnesty for illegal immigrants is a way to curry favor with Hispanics; and that legalizing marijuana is a way to woo Hispanics. is a completely disgusting way to curry favor with black people. But if history is any guide, they probably won’t change.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.