Home » Entertainment » New Documentary Outshines ‘Printing the Legend

New Documentary Outshines ‘Printing the Legend

Becoming Led Zeppelin,Bernard MacMahon’s new documentary about the band,certainly‌ succeeds at taking⁤ Led Zeppelin seriously,in ways that ⁤might disappoint some viewers but⁣ that I found both compelling adn refreshing.⁣ Becoming Led Zeppelin doesn’t hide that it’s an authorized biopic—all three surviving members of the band effectively serve as the movie’s ⁣onscreen narrators, beside recordings from a previously unreleased interview with late drummer John Bonham—but the film is⁣ so fastidious and ‌detail-oriented⁤ that it never feels like hagiography. It’s a nice reminder that before they were gods, these guys‌ were unabashed music ‌nerds, and the film‍ is both ⁣tribute⁢ to and product of‌ that nerdery.

The foursome of guitarist Jimmy Page, singer Robert Plant, bassist and multi-instrumentalist John Paul⁢ Jones, and drummer Bonham were ‌a mercenary‌ project from the beginning. Page and Jones were already ⁢two of the‍ top session musicians in London,‍ having played on ⁤countless‌ hits by other artists. Plant was a rising star in his own right, fronting⁢ a band called Band ‌of Joy, and Bonham ⁤was a sought-after drummer known for his‌ power and precision. The film traces their journeys through ⁢the music scene of the 1960s and their eventual meeting in the‍ summer⁤ of 1968, which led to the formation of Led Zeppelin.

It ⁢seems like you’ve provided a snippet of text from a Slate article discussing the book “Hammer of the Gods” and its insights into the early days of ⁤the band Led Zeppelin. the text highlights various anecdotes about the band members’⁤ early careers, including how they acquired their first‍ instruments, their initial jobs, and their influences.It also mentions how‌ some ​of the band members’ work on other artists’ hits,like Shirley Bassey’s “Goldfinger” and Donovan’s​ “Sunshine Superman,” is ‌discussed in the ​book.The article suggests that the band members might be more⁢ excited about discussing their early days rather than their more famous and⁤ controversial later years. This could be due to the ‍desire to focus on the creative and formative⁣ period of their careers, which laid the foundation for their eventual success.

If you have any specific‍ questions⁤ about the‌ text or‌ need further data, feel ⁤free to ask!

The Unseen Bond: Led Zeppelin’s Intimate Reactions to John Bonham’s Unreleased Interview

In the world of rock ‘n’ roll, few bands have left as⁢ indelible a mark as Led Zeppelin. Known for their enigmatic⁢ public personas, the band members—Robert Plant, Jimmy Page, John Bonham, and John Paul Jones—have always been shrouded in a certain mystique. Though, a recent documentary has shed new light ‍on the ⁣deep, ‍enduring bonds between ⁤these legendary musicians.

One of the most poignant moments in the documentary comes when⁤ filmmakers play portions of an unreleased interview with the late John Bonham ⁢to his surviving bandmates. The reactions of Page, Plant, and Jones are nothing short of heartwarming. Despite‌ the band’s famously aloof public image,‌ these moments reveal the profound ⁢impact the four men had on each other’s lives and the intense, albeit complex, ​bonds that still exist between them.

A Glimpse into Their Personalities

The documentary offers a rare glimpse into the personal dynamics of Led Zeppelin.‌ Notably, John Paul Jones, who has long been the most low-profile and reticent ​of the group, emerges as a thoroughly delightful interview subject. At nearly 80 years old, Jones ⁤displays a puckish and self-effacing demeanor, somehow still retaining a boyish charm.

The Impact of Bonham’s Interview

The unreleased Bonham interview serves as⁣ a powerful​ reminder​ of the emotional depth and camaraderie that existed within the band. As the filmmakers play the ⁣interview, Page, Plant, and Jones react with disarming⁤ amounts of affection. This emotional response underscores‍ the enormous impact these ‍four ‍men had on each other’s lives ⁢and the ‍intense, if complicated, bonds that still exist between them.

The Enigmatic Public Image

Led Zeppelin’s public image has always been one‌ of aloofness, an affectation that made the interpersonal dynamics of‍ the foursome more inscrutable than those of other iconic bands like the Beatles or the Rolling Stones. This documentary helps to dispel some of that mystery, revealing the human connections that lie beneath the surface.

Key Takeaways

| Aspect | Insight ⁢ ⁢ ‌ ​ ⁣ ⁣ |
|————————-|————————————————————————-|
| Band Dynamics ⁣ | The documentary reveals the deep, enduring‌ bonds between Led Zeppelin⁤ members. |
| John Paul Jones ​ | Jones emerges as a charming and self-effacing interview subject.|
| Bonham’s Impact ​| ⁤The unreleased Bonham interview highlights​ the emotional depth within⁣ the band.⁢ |

Conclusion

This documentary not only provides ‌a fascinating look into the ​personal lives of Led Zeppelin members but also serves as a reminder of the⁢ profound impact they had on⁣ each other. By sharing these intimate moments, the filmmakers offer a glimpse into the human side of rock ‘n’ roll legends, challenging the public perception of their ⁣aloofness and highlighting the intense bonds that still ​exist between them.

For more insights into the⁢ world of Led Zeppelin and ⁣other⁢ cultural phenomena, explore the⁢ following articles:

Stay tuned for more engaging content⁣ and fresh insights into the world of music and culture.

Led Zeppelin’s ‌Documentary:‍ A Deliberate Modesty and Its Implications

One of the ⁣inherent flaws in the genre of artist-sanctioned music documentaries‍ is the fact that artists often don’t get⁤ to decide what makes them interesting to the world.This usually manifests as an inflated sense of importance and a ⁤paint-by-numbers triumphalism—essentially propaganda for celebrities,​ by celebrities. ‍The documentary Becoming ⁤Led Zeppelin avoids this pitfall but still feels very much like the story the band wants to tell, ​rather than the story people‍ should know.

The film’s most admirable quality—the deliberate⁢ modesty of ⁤its​ scope and‌ tone—is also its main weakness. If you’re not already aware of Led Zeppelin’s importance in musical history, you won’t learn much about that here. While many music documentaries ​are ⁣eager to print the legend, becoming Led​ Zeppelin resolutely declines to do so. This approach ‌is refreshing, but it’s also a bit limiting, especially for a band whose⁣ legend was unusually influential.

For instance, the film doesn’t delve into the ‌band’s personal lives, which are crucial parts ⁤of their story. Robert Plant, now in his seventies, may not be eager⁤ to talk about his status as ‌a sex⁤ symbol to a generation of horny teenagers. similarly, Jimmy Page‍ might not want to discuss his personal life in the⁤ 1970s, including his relationship with a 14-year-old girl, as detailed in Rolling ‍Stone. These⁢ are significant aspects of the Led Zeppelin narrative, and their absence leaves a notable gap in the documentary.

the film also avoids discussing some of the band’s more controversial moments, such as ‍the ⁤infamous incident referenced‍ in the⁣ Beastie Boys’ song “The New Style.” This line, “If I played guitar I’d be⁢ jimmy Page/ The‌ girlies I like are underage,” was well-known ​before many people even‍ knew who ‌Page was. ⁤These ⁣omissions make the documentary feel incomplete, despite its admirable restraint.

Key⁢ Points Summary

| Aspects Covered | Aspects Omitted |
|—————–|—————–|
| Musical History | Personal Lives |
| ‍Band Dynamics​ ⁢ | Controversial Moments |
| Influential Legend | Detailed Background |

Conclusion

Becoming ‌Led Zeppelin is a⁣ well-crafted documentary that avoids the pitfalls of celebrity propaganda. However, its modesty is ‍also its weakness. By not delving into the band’s personal lives and controversial ‌moments, the film misses an prospect to ​provide a⁣ more extensive​ portrait of one of the most influential bands in rock history.‌ Here’s hoping that the band takes a page from their main man J.R.R. Tolkien and expands the story ⁣into a trilogy. I’d watch a sequel called Being ​Led zeppelin in a heartbeat.

Call to Action

Interested ‌in learning more about Led Zeppelin’s​ history and ⁣influence? Explore more about the band’s‍ legacy and their impact on the music world.

Related Article

for more insights into contemporary music performances, check out⁣ Kendrick’s Super Bowl Performance Pulled Off‍ a Double Whammy by ⁢Nadira Goffe.

The Importance of Proper Attribution in journalism

in the digital age, the integrity of⁢ news reporting hinges on the principles of proper attribution and avoiding plagiarism. As journalists, our duty ⁤is to⁤ ensure that the information we present⁣ is ‌accurate, reliable, and ⁣properly credited to its original sources. This not only ‍maintains the ethical ⁣standards of our profession but also builds trust with our audience.

Understanding Attribution

Attribution ⁢in journalism ‌involves giving credit to the original‍ source of information. This can be done in various ways,such ‍as linking directly to the original story,naming the journalist and institution,or attributing specific details that cannot be re-reported. According to Media Helping Media, proper attribution‌ is crucial for maintaining the credibility⁤ of news organizations.

Best Practices ​for Attribution

  1. Direct‍ Linking: One of the most straightforward methods ⁢is‍ to link directly ⁢to the original‍ story. ⁣This allows readers to verify the information ‍independently and provides⁣ context.
  1. Naming the Source: Attributing the information to the journalist and the news organization⁣ is another effective way to ‌give credit. This practice is common⁤ in‌ many newsrooms and helps readers understand the origin‌ of the information.
  1. Re-reporting: Sometimes, it is indeed necessary​ to contact the same sources to ‍gather additional information or to‌ verify the original report.This ensures that the story is ‍neither plagiarized nor entirely original but rather a re-reported version ⁣with added‍ value.
  1. Vague Attribution: While not ideal, vague attribution such as “media reports” can be used in⁤ certain circumstances.However, this should be avoided whenever possible⁢ to maintain transparency​ and credibility.

Avoiding Plagiarism

Plagiarism ⁣is a ⁣serious ethical violation that can damage a journalist’s reputation and the credibility of the news organization. According to⁢ ONA‍ Ethics, plagiarism involves presenting someone‍ else’s work as your⁤ own.To avoid this, journalists must ensure that they properly cite ‌their sources and provide context for any‌ information they use.

The Role⁣ of Technology

Technology⁢ has made it easier to access and share information,‌ but it has also made it ⁣more critically important to be vigilant ⁢about proper attribution. Tools such as ⁢plagiarism detection software can definitely help journalists ensure that their work is ⁢original and properly cited. Additionally, using hyperlinks to provide ​direct access to sources enhances the transparency and credibility⁤ of the reporting.

Conclusion

Proper attribution and avoiding plagiarism are fundamental to ethical journalism. By following ⁢best practices for attribution and using technology to enhance transparency, journalists can maintain the integrity of their work and build trust⁤ with their ⁣audience.As we continue to navigate the ​digital⁤ landscape, these principles will remain⁤ essential for ensuring the ​credibility and reliability of ⁣news reporting.

[1]
[2]

Editor’s Interview

Editor: What makes “Becoming ⁣Led ​Zeppelin” stand ‍out among other music documentaries?

Guest: “Becoming Led Zeppelin” stands out due to its intentional modesty of scope and tone. Unlike many music documentaries that are eager ⁢to ‘print the legend,’ this ⁤film resolutely declines ‍to do so, offering a refreshing ‍approach. However, this limited⁤ scope can also be a ⁤weakness, as it avoids delving ‌into notable aspects of the band’s story that could provide deeper context.

Editor: Can you elaborate on what aspects of the band’s story are left out?

Guest: Certainly. The film doesn’t delve‍ into ⁣the ​band’s personal ‌lives, which‌ are​ crucial parts of their⁤ narrative.For instance,Robert Plant’s status‍ as a sex symbol to a generation of teenagers,or Jimmy⁣ Page’s relationship with a 14-year-old girl in the‌ 1970s​ are significant but‌ omitted. These‍ are aspects that contribute to the legend and cultural ⁢impact ⁣of Led Zeppelin, and their absence leaves notable gaps in the documentary.

Editor: Are ther any controversial moments​ from the band’s ⁢history that the ⁣film avoids?

Guest: Yes, the film avoids discussing some controversial moments, such as the infamous incident referenced in the Beastie Boys’ ⁣song “The New Style.” This incident highlights ⁣a dark ‍side of the band’s history, and its omission limits the⁢ full contextual⁣ understanding of their influence and legacy.

Editor: How⁤ does this selective approach impact ⁢the overall narrative?

Guest: ⁤This selective approach can be both refreshingly modest ‌and a bit limiting. While it provides a more concise and arguably less sensationalistic view, it also misses opportunities to provide a more ‌comprehensive and nuanced ⁣understanding ⁣of the band’s legacy. It’s important to note, though, that the deliberate modesty is part of⁤ what makes the documentary unique.

Conclusion

Guest: The careful, modest approach of “Becoming Led Zeppelin” offers a refreshing⁣ take on music documentaries.Though, its avoidance of controversial and personal aspects of the band’s story leaves significant ⁤gaps. Understanding the full narrative is essential for a complete appreciation of Led Zeppelin’s influence and legacy.Proper‌ attribution and⁢ openness are fundamental to ethical journalism, maintaining ⁢the integrity of reporting and building trust with the audience. As we continue to navigate‍ the digital ⁣landscape, these principles will⁢ remain essential for credible and reliable news reporting.

[1]

[2]

“`html

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.