Home » today » Entertainment » New crisis rumors about Prince Harry

New crisis rumors about Prince Harry

Would you rather go on a hiking trip with friends than spend time with your wife? This was apparently on Prince Harry’s to-do list for his 40th birthday, which he spent without his wife Meghan (43). In England there are rumors – once again – that there is a crisis between the “black sheep” of the royal family.

Would you like more drama from the royals? Check out this series!

40 years. A round and a special birthday. What’s the best way to celebrate? In Prince Harry’s opinion, definitely not with his loved ones. In any case, the prince preferred to go on a hiking trip with friends and spend the night in a hut rather than celebrate with his wife and children.

There are once again rumors of marital crisis in England, as it wasn’t the first time that Harry and Meghan didn’t appear together recently. Rather the opposite: According to “The Sun”, the occasions on which they appeared together in public are clearly in the minority. Are the two of them becoming more and more distant from each other?

Did Meghan’s birthday surprise have a double meaning?

Of course: there is no evidence. In addition, “The Sun” quotes “sources close to the couple” who say that the hiking trip was a birthday gift from Meghan to Harry. She organized the trip with his friends and surprised her husband. And positively. Since it was a men’s outing, it makes sense that Meghan didn’t attend – nor did the other guys’ girlfriends and wives.

So is the suspicion of a crisis unfounded? Maybe not entirely. There were some among the English royal experts who classified the hiking trip surprise as fake. Motto: Meghan gives him something so she doesn’t have to be with him. It is secretly said that there are numerous indications that things are not looking too rosy in the “Sussexes” house.

There hasn’t been a photo together for weeks

Shortly before Harry’s birthday, Meghan canceled her participation in a charity event in Santa Barbara, California at short notice. She had become ill. That may be true, but it is questionable whether she instead recovered in the family villa in Montecito, just ten kilometers away. According to “The Sun”, Meghan has rarely stayed overnight there lately, preferring instead to stay at the hotel in Beverly Hills. But this also has a very pragmatic advantage: from there she can get to her agency more quickly.

One thing is certain: both of them haven’t been seen together at events for a long time. Harry flew alone to Africa, where he worked on his Sentebale charity in Lesotho and had campfire talks with co-founder and partner Prince Seeiso of Lesotho. In May, Meghan was there on an earlier trip.

Do you already know the tragic life story of Harry’s mother Lady Diana?

Prince Harry alone in New York, Meghan alone in Los Angeles

Harry attended an event in New York hosted by the Halo Trust, a charity for landmine victims that was once close to the heart of Harry’s mother, Lady Di. No sign of Meghan.

Harry was at the charity dinner organized by the World Health Organization (WHO) in New York – no Meghan here either. She also didn’t accompany Harry to London. By the way, Harry wasn’t there to visit his father King Charles, who was suffering from cancer, or his brother William. Rather, he honored seriously ill young people at the “WellChild Awards”, of which he is patron, in London’s Royal Lancaster Hotel.

Harry seemed comfortable on his solo trips, The Sun wrote: “He was in good shape, full of energy and seemed quite happy to be traveling alone.”

Did Harry even get a tattoo on one of his solo outings?

The Daily Mail didn’t want to write the same thing about Meghan Markle. She attended – without Harry – the “LA Children’s Hospital” gala in downtown Los Angeles on the evening of October 5th. As the “Daily Mail” said with reference to a body language expert, Meghan appeared “lost”, “shy” and “insecure” in the spotlight on the red carpet.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.