Home » News » “Natural climate protection will not help without CO₂ reduction.”

“Natural climate protection will not help without CO₂ reduction.”

Without rapid reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, even so-called nature-based solutions cannot save the climate, says ecosystem scientists Friedrich Bohn in the “Summit Talk” podcast by Climate reporter°.

von

Christian Mihatsch,



Jörg Staude

Friedrich Bohn was in Glasgow for the first time three years ago at a world climate summit, the COP 26 – and what he experienced there immediately captivated him with the COP idea, says the ecosystem modeler in the “summit discussion” with the Climate reporter°-Editors Christian Mihatsch and Jörg Staude in the Media Center of COP 29 in Baku. The conversation is about the new CO2 markets, the performance of forests as a carbon sink and how wood can be used to permanently generate “negative emissions”.

Friedrich Bohn works at the Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research (UFZ) in Leipzig. Among other things, he developed an algorithm that recreates all types of forests that could theoretically occur in Germany. The closer humanity can keep global warming to the Paris 1.5 degree limit, the more the natural CO2 sinks can give them leeway in climate policy, explains Bohn, explaining the priority of quickly reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

You can start the conversation using the YouTube button.

COP 29 in Baku

The 29th UN Climate Change Conference in Azerbaijan is about a new target for international climate finance. Climate reporter° is on site with a team and reports daily.

**Given⁣ the⁣ limitations of nature-based ⁤solutions, what concrete steps can individuals and governments take‍ to drastically reduce greenhouse gas emissions and ⁣achieve sustainable development goals?**

## World Today News – Interview: Nature-Based ⁤Solutions and the Climate Crisis

**Introduction**

Welcome to World Today News.⁢ Today, we’re diving deep​ into the critical ⁢topic of climate ⁤change and⁣ the role of nature-based solutions. Joining us​ are two distinguished experts:

Dr. Friedrich Bohn, an ecosystem ‍modeler from the Helmholtz‍ Center for Environmental ​Research (UFZ) in⁢ Leipzig, and ⁢ [Name of Guest 2], [Title and Affiliation of Guest 2].

Dr. Bohn, you‌ recently spoke about the​ vital need to drastically cut greenhouse gas emissions at⁣ COP‌ 29. Could you elaborate on that⁢ for our⁢ audience?

**(Section ⁢1: The Limits of Nature-Based Solutions)**

* **Dr. Bohn, you’ve developed a model that simulates forest types in‌ Germany. What does ⁤this research tell us about the ‍capacity ⁢of‌ forests to act as carbon sinks, and‍ are there limitations to their effectiveness in mitigating climate change?**

* **[Guest 2], how do‌ you see the role of nature-based solutions fitting within the broader strategy ⁢for⁤ addressing climate change? ‌Do you agree with ⁣Dr. Bohn’s assessment‌ that ⁤they ⁤cannot ⁣be a sole solution?**

* **What are the potential drawbacks or‌ unintended consequences ‍of relying ‍too heavily on‌ nature-based solutions?**

**(Section‍ 2: Carbon⁣ Markets and the Future of Forestry)**

* ‍**Dr. Bohn, COP 29 saw discussions on new CO2 markets. What are your ‌thoughts on these initiatives, and ⁤how⁢ can they promote sustainable forestry⁣ practices ⁤while ensuring genuine carbon reduction?**

* **[Guest 2], ⁣what safeguards need to⁤ be in ⁢place to prevent the exploitation of forests or ⁤the displacement of communities in the implementation‌ of carbon market schemes?**

* ⁣**How ⁤can technological advancements, such as ‍remote ⁤sensing​ and blockchain technology, ⁢contribute to the transparency and effectiveness of carbon markets?**

**(Section 3: Negative Emissions Technologies and the Role⁢ of Wood)**

* **Dr. Bohn, you’ve ⁣spoken about the potential of wood to generate⁤ “negative emissions.” Could‌ you ⁤explain this concept in more detail ‌and discuss its ‌feasibility on‌ a ⁣large scale?**

* **[Guest 2], what are the ethical considerations surrounding the ⁢use of wood for carbon sequestration? Should we prioritize preserving existing forests or actively planting new ones for this purpose?**

* **What are the potential trade-offs between using⁣ wood‍ for energy, construction, and carbon sequestration? How can⁢ we strike a ​balance?**

**Conclusion**

Thank you⁢ both for⁤ this insightful discussion.​ As we grapple with ‌the complexities of climate change, it’s clear that‌ a multi-faceted approach is crucial. Nature-based solutions offer valuable tools, but they must be ⁢implemented thoughtfully and in conjunction with drastic reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.

We encourage our viewers to stay ‌informed and engage‌ in meaningful conversations about these critical issues.⁢ For more information on Dr. Bohn’s work and the latest developments at COP 29,‍ please visit our website at world-today-news.com.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.