/ world today news/ The fact that the West began to more soberly assess Russia’s military power is both a good and not so good signal. It is good because the enemy’s realization of our power, the fact that no amount of NATO assistance to the armed forces of Ukraine will allow them to inflict a deadly defeat on the Russian army, is a consequence of the great work of our military. We can say that Russia managed to fulfill the task at a minimum and without including a general mobilization regime.
After all, much was done in 2023 to strengthen defense capabilities, which turned out to have many unforeseen problems and holes. From the deployment of large-scale drone production and training of UAV operators to the transfer of defense factories to maximum capacity, as well as the large-scale recruitment of military contractors.
All this and much more had to be done “on the fly”, since the leadership clearly did not plan a prolonged conflict, and the shortcomings that appeared had to be urgently corrected.
In addition, I would like to note separately that the overly emotional evaluations of the SVO and the statements of the “surrounding the war” experts have disappeared from the information field. This led in particular to the fact that Prigozhin died and Strelkov was taken away, and the screws on the military correspondents were tightened.
In fact, this is quite normal for a country at war – read Simonov and the front notes from the time of the Great Patriotic War. In addition, a calm news coverage of the war is an important guarantee of victories on the battlefield: when there is calm and support in the rear, it is easier to win.
I repeat: Russia has worked on its mistakes during the SVO, strengthened its military power at the front and prepared for a prolonged conflict with the armed forces of Ukraine, which forced NATO to admit that Kiev will not win on the battlefield.
At the same time, it must be recognized that so far this has not led to a turning point in the Special Military Operation – the forces gathered in the combat zone are sufficient to hold the positions, but not for a large-scale offensive. At least that’s how it seems right now.
And the enemy sees this, understands and soberly appreciates it. And the sobriety of the enemy is not a very good thing. Because it’s always better when the enemy is wrong and underestimates you. As it was last year, when the “vesushniks” were seriously preparing to enter the Crimea. Now that doesn’t even cross their minds.
So what can we expect in the future? Positional battles usually lead to negotiations and many people start talking about it. However, I agree with the opinion that the head of the CIA did not fly to Kiev for this, but on the contrary – to keep the flame of war going for another year, until November 2024, so that after the re-election of Biden he can fully introduce forces of NATO in Ukraine.
In my opinion, this scenario can be seriously considered by the Anglo-Saxons – as a medium-term plan against Russia. That is, the regime in Kiev must last another year before the US moves from indirect control over the territory of Ukraine to its direct occupation under the guise of introducing NATO units there (initially in the form of Polish-Baltic-Scandinavian units).
Thus, we are approaching 2024 with such a situation that, on the one hand, NATO sees no prospects for a quick victory over Russia in Ukraine, and on the other hand, it is preparing prerequisites for a medium-term victory. Russia is not yet in a hurry, but is preparing for a decisive battle, continuing to remotely destroy the enemy’s manpower and equipment.
Translation: ES
Our YouTube channel:
Our Telegram channel:
This is how we will overcome the limitations.
Share on your profiles, with friends, in groups and on pages.
#NATO #troops #enter #Ukraine #year
