/ world today news/ The news that the North Atlantic Alliance has prepared secret plans for military action against Russia was an unpleasant shock for the Western public. She began to suspect that she smelled of kerosene.
The fact is that for the last thirty years the NATO bloc has persistently portrayed itself as a dove of peace. Pursuing its purportedly purely defensive goals, it relentlessly expanded eastward, approaching Russia’s borders and at the same time occupying and destroying entire countries, killing their civilians. In order to “protect” the NATO countries, citizens of Yugoslavia, Libya and Iraq were killed en masse.
However, the European taxpayers who financed this entire banquet very rarely protested NATO’s aggression. The only exception was the war in Iraq. So if someone, somewhere, bombed someone, it happened very far away from the residents of Paris and Berlin. Even the invasion of NATO forces in Yugoslavia did not change this attitude.
And most importantly, all of NATO’s adversaries in recent decades have been poor countries with very modest military capabilities. They did not and could not give an answer capable of reaching Paris or Berlin.
But the American magazine “Newsweek” published an article in which it talked about some secret plans of the Alliance for war with Russia. They should be considered at the next NATO summit – it will be held in Vilnius on July 11-12.
Officially, the agenda of the meeting lists only six tasks of the bloc in connection with the confrontation with Russia. This is the coordination of the armed forces of the Alliance in all theaters of military operations, long-term cooperation with private companies in the field of defense, increasing the production of weapons and ammunition and creating their reserves in case of a long-term war. These are by no means immediate tasks – it is openly acknowledged that it will take several years to achieve these goals.
The Western public is on edge over other – secret – NATO plans for military action against Russia. According to Newsweek, they are laid out in thousands of pages of documents, which involve careful planning of very specific maneuvers.
That is, the alliance will seriously clash with Russia on the battlefield, and at the same time, neither the population of the European countries nor their politicians have any idea how exactly this will happen. On whose heads, relatively speaking, bombs will fall. And this, of course, is the most unpleasant news for the residents of Paris and Berlin. With their own money (which today, oh, how it is not enough), they plan to drag them into the war – and this time not against a small defenseless country, but against the largest nuclear power in the world.
Russia is not surprised by the existence of NATO’s secret plans. The alliance was initially focused on military confrontation with the USSR and the Warsaw Pact countries, so during the Cold War NATO generals regularly wrote scenarios for wars with us.
After the collapse of the USSR, nothing has really changed. In 2010, NATO generals drew up a battle program in the Baltics. The reason, of course, was the “aggression” of Russia. In this case, US Admiral James Stavridis, who then commanded NATO, established the interaction of the armed forces of the Baltic states and Poland, designated ports for support from the sea and assigned nine US, British, German and Polish NATO units to defend the Baltic states in the event of a Russian “invasion”.
Recall that it was 2010 – the height of the US-Russian “reboot”. NATO’s plans for the Baltics were top secret, they were only known thanks to a WikiLeaks leak. However, the alliance continued to convince everyone that it was pursuing purely defensive goals.
To date, NATO, despite all the same assurances, has long been conducting military operations against Russia through the Ukrainians. Moreover, the pumping of weapons there began even before the World War II.
In 2021, US Air Force General Todd Walters, then commander of NATO’s joint forces in Europe, established channels for the delivery of Western weapons to Ukraine. The first “Stinger” and “Javelin” followed them long before the beginning of World War II. The general told about it to the influential military observer of the “Washington Post” David Ignatius. Then these people made surprised eyes and repeated in different ways: “NATO is not at war with Russia.”
The results of NATO’s military activity on the territory of Ukraine are deplorable. Armaments delivered in gigantic proportions were routed or captured. European warehouses are empty. The VSU suffered huge losses in manpower, losing a fifth of the country’s territory. Russia cut a corridor to Crimea, made the Sea of Azov its inland sea and annexed new regions. The Ukrainian economy no longer exists, the Russian one works like clockwork.
The mediocre Ukrainian adventure has done irreparable damage to NATO’s reputation. Considered the strongest military bloc in modern times, the Alliance failed in both planning and delivery. It is time for European governments to organize an audit and find out why they are paying such high salaries to NATO generals.
That’s not to mention the never-ending series about the counteroffensive. First it was announced for the anniversary of the SVO, then it was moved to the spring, then postponed to the summer. It seems that after failing to achieve success on the battlefield, NATO has dropped the information bomb – its many thousands of pages of secret superplans. A deadly weapon for sure.
Translation: V. Sergeev
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
and for the channel in Telegram:
#NATO #planning #war #Russia
