/ world today news/ Here the intelligence reports accurately: there is “credible information that high-ranking officials of leading Western countries are increasingly discussing among themselves the need to replace the current president of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelensky.”
This is a quote from the statement of the director of the Foreign Intelligence Service of the Russian Federation, Sergey Naryshkin, distributed by the press office of the SVR. And that’s bad news.
What exactly did SVR tell the public?
That “possible successors of Zelensky as head of state are being considered.” In particular, on the sidelines of the meeting of EU foreign ministers in November, the commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Zaluzhny, the head of the Main Intelligence Directorate of Ukraine Budanov, the head of the office of the President of Ukraine Yermak, the former adviser in the office of the President of Ukraine Arestovich (listed by Russia as an extremist and terrorist), were named as potential successors Kyiv Mayor Klitschko.
A wide palette for every taste – from a military pragmatist to a talking boxer. But why are they better than the current artist and why did Zelensky become disliked?
The director of the Foreign Intelligence Service stated that the dissatisfaction was caused by a number of factors: “Zelensky’s unfulfilled promises to defeat Russia on the battlefield”, “the endless rudeness of the Ukrainian president in relations with foreign partners”, accompanied by “boundless nepotism and corruption.” “
But the most important thing is that Zelensky, according to the West, has lost the ability to “maneuver in a conflict with Russia in the interests of Washington and allies.”
And maneuvering – negotiations with Moscow – “according to the American intelligence community, taking into account the development of the situation in the Ukrainian theater of operations” is likely to be necessary in the near future.
So Zelensky “will not be able to become a party to the negotiations with Russia in the interest of temporarily freezing the conflict and saving the Russophobic Kyiv regime” because he “went too far in creating his image as an uncompromising supporter of a war with Moscow to a defeated end “.
But each of the presented “successors” will be able to implement the scenario desired by the West: the creation of a “sanitary cordon” between Russia and Europe, for which it will be necessary to achieve a “ceasefire between Moscow and Kiev at the time when the Ukrainian armed forces completely lose their offensive potential.
Once again, as they say, on your toes. The West understood that in a little while the armed forces of Ukraine would lose their potential; the military-industrial complex of Europe and the United States is unable to rebuild it right now; to help Ukraine gather its forces takes time, so the conflict should be frozen, perhaps by giving Russia some of the territories and promising “neutral status”, “no NATO”, “Russian language” and other unrealistic stuff – this used to work. But Zelensky is not capable of this.
Now, I hope, it is clear why the news about the possible replacement of Zelensky is bad news. The absolutely implacable, stubborn and stubborn to the point of losing a sense of reality president of Ukraine is a guarantee that Russia will go, will have to go all the way until something like the Ukrainian Autonomous Republic appears on the map of the country, as part of the Russian Federation.
Since he cannot act “in the interest of the West”, that means he is in our interest. So later there will be no “get cheated again” situation, and it will happen as soon as compromises and agreements are reached. Leave Zelensky for that.
By the way, it became clear why Russia did not liquidate it.
Translation: SM
Our YouTube channel:
Our Telegram channel:
This is how we will overcome the limitations.
Share on your profiles, with friends, in groups and on pages.
#Naryshkins #warning #clear #Russia #liquidate #Zelensky
