NAR and Phoenix realtors Settle MLS Access Dispute: A Turning Point for Real Estate?
Table of Contents
A contentious standoff between the National Association of Realtors (NAR) and the Phoenix Association of Realtors (PAR) over Multiple Listing Service (MLS) access for non-Realtors has ended with a settlement, marking a potential shift in the real estate industry. The agreement resolves a dispute that highlighted growing concerns about the industry’s “three-way agreement” and fueled antitrust lawsuits.
The core of the conflict stemmed from PAR’s previous “MLS Choice” membership option, which allowed agents access to the Arizona Regional MLS (ARMLS) without being members of the Arizona Association of Realtors or NAR. This option has been eliminated. In its place, PAR will offer “non-member MLS access,” a practice dating back to 1996, providing ARMLS access and unspecified “products and services” to non-Realtors.
NAR issued a statement clarifying its position: This matter was never about MLS access, and NAR policy on this has not changed,
the statement read. ARMLS is and has long been open to non-Realtors. MLSs have local discretion to determine individual participation requirements based on their market and applicable law.
The statement continued,expressing satisfaction with the resolution: We are pleased to have reached this resolution,which protects the rigorous standards of the Realtor brand. We look forward to continuing to work with Phoenix Realtors in service of Realtors and our shared mission.
Agents opting for non-member MLS access will not be permitted to use the “Realtor” designation and will forfeit associated benefits of local, state, and national Realtor association memberships. This underscores the central issue: NAR’s requirement that realtors be members of their local, state, and national associations—the so-called “three-way agreement.”
This “three-way agreement” has faced increasing criticism, labeled anticompetitive by some. The controversy escalated significantly in August 2024 when Michigan real estate brokers filed an antitrust lawsuit against NAR over this rule. Similar lawsuits have been filed by brokers in other states, including Louisiana. The defendants—Realtors associations and MLSs—have filed motions to dismiss these cases.
The conflict between NAR and PAR intensified late last year when PAR announced it would allow non-Realtors ARMLS access starting in 2025. This prompted NAR to send PAR a cease-and-desist letter, escalating the situation to the point where NAR initiated the process of revoking PAR’s charter. However, the recent agreement appears to have averted this drastic measure.
PAR issued its own statement, emphasizing its commitment to the Realtor brand and the three-way agreement: Phoenix Realtors remains committed to the Realtors brand, the three-way agreement, and the benefits made possible by the relationship between the Phoenix association, Arizona Association of Realtors and NAR,
the statement said. This outcome supports both Phoenix Realtors and NAR’s ultimate goal of helping Realtors members succeed and the real estate industry at large thrive.
While this agreement resolves the immediate dispute between NAR and PAR, the debate surrounding the three-way agreement is far from over. The Austin Board of Realtors (ABoR) recently announced a similar move, granting non-Realtors access to unlock MLS starting June 1, suggesting this issue will continue to shape the future of the real estate industry.
Could the recent settlement between NAR and Phoenix Realtors signal a transformative era in real estate? An expert weighs in on what this means for the industry.
The Three-Way Agreement: A legacy Under fire
Senior Editor: The recent agreement between the National Association of Realtors (NAR) and Phoenix Association of Realtors (PAR) concerning MLS access seems too have averted a serious conflict. Can you elaborate on why this settlement is viewed as a potential turning point for the real estate industry?
Expert: Absolutely. This settlement is a significant development as it touches on long-standing tensions within the real estate sector, notably regarding the “three-way agreement” that has governed Realtor membership and MLS access for years. The core issue revolves around the exclusivity associated wiht the MLS system—a critical tool for real estate transactions.
Historically, this three-pronged agreement has required Realtors to be members of their local, state, and national associations, granting them benefits like the use of the “Realtor” designation. Though, this has increasingly been criticized as anticompetitive, particularly as the industry modernizes and more players seek access to MLS data without these rigid affiliation requirements.
The resolution between NAR and PAR reflects a potential industry shift. Phoenix’s initial move to allow non-Realtors access via the “MLS Choice” program, albeit now altered, was groundbreaking. It highlighted a growing demand for more inclusive practices that could democratize MLS access, fostering a more competitive and diverse market.
What’s in a Name? Beyond the Realtor Brand
Senior Editor: how does the exclusion from the “realtor” designation impact agents operating under the “non-member MLS access” agreement?
Expert: The impact is substantial. The “Realtor” brand carries significant weight in real estate, signifying adherence to a specific code of ethics and access to a network of resources and benefits accumulated through association membership. By opting for “non-member MLS access,” agents gain technical access to MLS data but relinquish these affiliations’ associated prestige and resources.
This move represents both a challenge and an opportunity. Agents might face initial hurdles in establishing credibility without the “Realtor” designation. Yet, it opens up MLS data to a broader set of players, potentially leveling the playing field. As seen in other tech industries, increased access to critical data sources can spur innovation, lead to service diversification, and ultimately enrich the market landscape.
The Legal Landscape and Future Implications
Senior Editor: With antitrust lawsuits unfolding in states like Michigan and Louisiana, how do you see the legal surroundings evolving around the “three-way agreement”?
Expert: The legal disputes underscore a pivotal moment for the industry. Antitrust allegations focus on whether the “three-way agreement” perpetuates a closed system that limits competition—a charge with significant implications for the future of MLS policies.
For years, local MLS boards had discretion over participation rules, but increased legal scrutiny could drive legislative or policy shifts to ensure more open access. The ongoing conversations and lawsuits might catalyze an industry-wide reevaluation of customary frameworks, encouraging more obvious, participant-friendly models.
Consider the broader context: Similar challenges have reshaped industries before. antitrust actions against digital giants have spurred regulatory changes, indicating that while legal battles can be lengthy, thay frequently enough lead to substantive policy shifts and fairer market practices.
What’s Next for Real Estate Professionalism?
Senior Editor: Outside legal challenges, how do you envision real estate professionalism evolving in response to these changes?
Expert: The evolution hinges on balancing openness with maintaining standards. As MLS access becomes less exclusive, industry stakeholders must innovate ways to preserve service quality and ethical standards while embracing the advantages of a more open system.
We anticipate a reshaping of professional development and continuous education in response. Real estate associations may introduce alternative credentials or certifications, enabling agents to demonstrate expertise and commitment to ethics sans the traditional “Realtor” brand. This could usher in more diverse, specialized roles within the industry, reflecting wider trends in how professional landscapes adapt to technological and regulatory changes.
A Call to Consider the Future
The ongoing resolution of these disputes—whether legally, structurally, or culturally—offers a chance for rejuvenation within the real estate sector. As stakeholders adapt to these shifts, the potential for a more inclusive, innovative, and competitive industry grows.
Consider your stance on these developments and share your thoughts! Whether you’re a realtor weighing the pros and cons of non-member access or a consumer curious about the future of real estate,your insights are valuable. Join the discussion below and let us know how you think these changes will reshape the industry.