Jakarta –
Munarman gas again. Habib Rizieq Shihab’s team of attorneys argued against the prosecutor regarding the need for Habib Rizieq Shihab to be present in the courtroom.
Moment Munarman debating the prosecutor took place in the continued trial of Habib Rizieq which was held at the East Jakarta District Court (Jaktim PN), Tuesday (23/3/2021). Munarman initially asked the judge to suspend the trial or postpone the trial so that Habib Rizieq would be present at trial.
“The defendant, as stated at the beginning, the defendant is ready to read his exception or objection note when in this room. So we really beg to be suspended or postponed for another day so that we can decide with a cold head and heart. I think that’s the wisest for today,” said Munarman during a trial at the East Jakarta District Court (East Jakarta District Court), Tuesday (23/3/2021).
The prosecutor then delivered an interrupt. However Munarman confirmed that it was his turn to speak.
“Wait a minute, Public Prosecutor, this is my turn, this is my turn, this is my turn. You are silent. Be orderly, yes, we have been orderly, don’t make it disorderly,” said Munarman.
Chief Justice Suparman Nyompa tried to calm both sides. He asked the team of legal counsel and the prosecutor to both refrain.
“Please refrain, yes, both sides,” the judge said.
The judge finally decided that the trial was postponed to rest, pray and eat.
After going through quite a tough debate, the panel of judges finally granted the legal team’s request for Habib Rizieq to appear in the courtroom. The next Habib Rizieq trial will be held in person or offline.
“Ordered the public prosecutor to present the defendant to trial on every trial day,” said Suparman.
The panel of judges revoked the determination of the trial online Rizieq Shihab through stipulation number 221 / Pidsus / 2021. That way, the next Rizieq Shihab trial will be held regularly offline.
The judge asked legal counsel to abide by the bail that had been submitted. When violated, the execution of the trial offline will be reviewed.
“If the petitioner violates the statement in the letter of guarantee on March 23, 2021 then this determination is reviewed,” the judge said.
– .
