Here is the content you requested:
“During this personnel adjustment, the National Social Security Fund Council (hereinafter referred to as the Social Foundation), which has been announced for multiple appointments and removals, is also a focus.
Former Finance Minister Liu Kun is 68 years old. When he stepped down as Minister of Finance in 2023, he was over the 67-year-old retirement age at the ministerial level. On January 17 this year, he first replaced Ding Xuedong‘s position as Party Secretary of the Social Security Foundation, and on February 7, he replaced Liu wei’s position as Chairman of the Social Security Foundation. Ding Xuedong was born in 1960 and Liu Wei was born in 1961,both of which were a few years younger than Liu Kun.
More than a year after resigning, Liu Kun rarely served as the Party secretary and Chairman of the Communist party of China Social security Foundation, which was held by different officials in the past. He even returned to the Ministry of Finance and has also served as a member of the Party Leadership Group of the Ministry of Finance. In the CCP officialdom, it is indeed very rare for officials who have reached the age and retired to return to vital positions.
Liu Kun is an old classmate of He Lifeng, Vice Premier of the Communist Party of China, who is in charge of”article: Recent Appointments and Resignations in China’s State Council
- He Lifeng, a confidant of Xi Jinping, has attracted attention due to his nepotism.
- Ding Xuedong, previously Party Secretary and Vice Chairman of the Social Security Foundation, was recently removed from office. He is the first executive deputy secretary-general of the State council to face such an outcome.
- Huang Ming,Chen Jun,and Tang Li have been appointed to new positions within the China Institute of Engineering Physics.
- Zhang Kejian, former Party Secretary of the China Institute of Engineering physics, has not been seen publicly for several months and is rumored to be under investigation.
- Commentator Li Linyi suggests that the CCP is increasingly concealing the handling of senior officials, with some possibly under investigation or even deceased under mysterious circumstances.
- Li Linyi also notes that recent personnel changes under the state Council indicate notable internal struggles within the CCP, with instances of retired officials returning to squeeze out younger counterparts for profit-driven reasons.
Interview: Internal Struggles and oznceals within the CCP
Table of Contents
- Interview: Internal Struggles and oznceals within the CCP
- editor: Can you elaborate on the current state of personnel changes within the CCP and the meaning of these changes?
- Editor: How transparent is the CCP when it comes to dealing with such high-profile cases?
- Editor: Why do you think retired officials are stepping back into active roles, and what impact does this have on the younger officials?
- Editor: How do these changes affect the overall governance and policy-making process within China?
Recent personnel changes within the Chinese communist Party (CCP), especially under the state Council, have sparked significant interest and concern. Retired officials’ maneuvers to reassert their influence and squeeze out younger counterparts for profit-driven reasons are thought to be a driving factor behind these shifts. Commentator Li Linyi shares insights on the subject.
editor: Can you elaborate on the current state of personnel changes within the CCP and the meaning of these changes?
Li Linyi: Certainly. Recent changes within the CCP suggest that ther’s a notable amount of internal struggle and intrigue happening behind the scenes. One prominent example is the situations involving senior officials like Zhang Kejian, former Party Secretary of the China Institute of Engineering Physics.Zhang has not been seen publicly for several months, leading to speculation that he might be under examination.
Editor: How transparent is the CCP when it comes to dealing with such high-profile cases?
Li Linyi: The transparency is limited, to say the least. Commentators like myself suggest that the CCP is increasingly concealing the handling of senior officials. There are indications that some senior officials might be under investigation or, in some cases, have even passed away under mysterious circumstances. It’s a pattern that raises questions about both transparency and accountability within the party structure.
Editor: Why do you think retired officials are stepping back into active roles, and what impact does this have on the younger officials?
Li Linyi: Retired officials often have extensive networks and resources that can be leveraged for profit-driven reasons. Their return to active roles can be seen as an attempt to maintain or even expand their influence. This, in turn, creates tension and competition with younger officials trying to establish their own career trajectories., it’s about power and resources, which can lead to significant internal friction within the CCP.
Editor: How do these changes affect the overall governance and policy-making process within China?
Li Linyi: The ongoing internal struggles and personnel shifts can create instability and delay crucial decision-making processes. When retired officials re-enter the scene, it can disrupt the allocation of responsibilities and the flow of details, making it challenging for younger officials to gain the necessary experience and authority. Over time, this can affect the effectiveness of governance and policy implementation.
This interview with Li Linyi highlights the complexities and challenges within the CCP’s current political landscape. The overall picture suggests a-need for greater transparency and a balance of power to ensure the smooth functioning of governance and the fostering of younger leaders.
Conclusion: The internal struggles within the CCP, especially those involving retired and younger officials, underline the intricacies and tensions within China’s political leadership. Increased transparency and a more balanced approach to power distribution are crucial for effective governance and the long-term stability of the country.
