Producer Mohamed Al-Adl expressed his dissatisfaction with the statements of the star Youssef El-Sharif about the filming of scenes in the cinema, where he wrote through his account on Facebook: “We have finished the application of clean cinema … and we started to implement the stage of non-contact.”
Justice
And the artist, Youssef Al-Sharif, had said during the evening program dmc “Ten years ago I put these restrictions in my work and stipulated non-contact. Initially, the agreement was verbal, but that subjected me to some objections during filming, which prompted me to make this agreement written in the work contract, and I took this principle after the movie (it is chaos) and I remember That one of the great directors had shown on a movie and after reading it, I objected to the hot scenes in the movie, so the director and one of the critics responded (what does the working people do) do, and I actually thought about retiring, but the generosity of God was able to present many works with this principle.
And about his refusal to appear in the media a lot of times, Youssef Al-Sharif said: I would love to appear in the media when I have something to say, whether a new work, or after the success of a work I submitted, but my appearance without reason has no reason, I always follow the principle of the Messenger, may God bless him and grant him peace, saying that He said, “What is said and sufficient is better than what is many and divine.” This is my principle in life.
It is noteworthy that the director, Magdi Ahmed Ali, had also expressed his dissatisfaction with the statements of the star Youssef El Sharif, who confirmed in his opinion that it is not appropriate for artistic creativity, where he wrote through his account on the “Facebook” “I did not want to speak on the subject, but it provoked me to speak about freedom of opinion And the expression … the expression, uh, you are an actor … is part of an artistic work that has rules and foundations, the most important of which is that it is not a reality but rather a case of influencing scenes.
He added, “Then you are an actor subject to the conditions of the artwork. You do not have the right to impose conditions from outside it if you originally had the right to interfere in a work from the core of the profession of the author and director, creating the original work … What does all this have to do with freedom of opinion … Is a director who respects himself to replace A scene of a father embracing his absent daughter … because the father (the actor) decided that his daughter (the actress) is not his daughter in reality or that this is his opinion on art .. What is this nonsense .. I do not believe that I am already discussing it. “
– .
