Europe’s financing of the high-speed line between Bordeaux, Toulouse, and Dax has sparked controversy and divided opinions. While some officials and project lawyers are pleased with the funding obtained, environmentalists and politicians have expressed their concerns.
Victor Pachon, the spokesperson for CADE (Collective of associations for the defense of the environment of the Basque Country and the south of the Landes), criticized the “intense lobbying” by the New Aquitaine and Occitanie regions and the government, which resulted in what he called a “tiny sum” of funding. Pachon sarcastically acknowledged that this may be just the beginning, but emphasized that they are still far from the mark.
Nicolas Thierry, the EELV deputy of Gironde, took a different tone, stating that the funding from Europe for the high-speed line is “very bad news.” He argued that the public authorities are spending billions of euros on a line that will primarily serve large cities, while neglecting the need for daily transport in other areas. Thierry also criticized the government’s decision to postpone the commissioning of ZFEs (low-emission zones) due to a lack of public transport options, leaving residents in the outskirts with only their often old cars as a mode of transportation.
However, Alain Rousset and Carole Delga, chairs of New Aquitaine and Occitanie, respectively, along with other officials, expressed their satisfaction with the funding obtained from Europe. In a joint press release, they highlighted the significance of the decision, stating that it demonstrates Europe’s support for the communities in New Aquitaine and Occitania, as well as their Spanish and Portuguese neighbors. They emphasized the strategic importance of the railway developments in the south of Bordeaux for the service of the Iberian Peninsula and the potential for a secure implementation of the metropolitan RER (regional express network).
Meanwhile, another railway project is causing frustration in the region. The Pau-Canfranc-Zaragoza line, which aims to reopen the cross-border route, has seen progress from the Spanish government and rail network manager. However, the inaction of the French state in this project has annoyed stakeholders across the Pyrenees.
The debate over the financing of these railway projects highlights the differing perspectives on transportation priorities and the allocation of funds. While some see the funding as a positive step towards improved connectivity and regional development, others argue that it neglects the needs of daily transport and fails to address environmental concerns. The controversy surrounding these projects is likely to continue as stakeholders push for their respective interests and priorities.
What are the potential long-term consequences for biodiversity and precious landscapes if the high-speed line project is pursued
Roject will have a negative impact on the environment, increase carbon emissions, and destroy precious landscapes and biodiversity. Thierry questioned the priorities of the government and the European Union, suggesting that the money could be better spent on other pressing issues such as healthcare or education.
Meanwhile, supporters of the project see it as an opportunity for economic growth and development in the region. They argue that the high-speed line will enhance connectivity between Bordeaux, Toulouse, and Dax, providing better transportation options for businesses and residents. Proponents also highlight the job creation potential and the boost to tourism that the project could bring.
The controversy surrounding the financing of this high-speed line reflects a broader debate about the balance between economic development and environmental preservation. While some argue that the project will contribute to the region’s prosperity, others are concerned about the long-term consequences for the environment.
As the debate continues, it remains to be seen whether the funding for the high-speed line will be enough to push the project forward or if opposition will slow down its progress.
The EU’s funding for the high-speed rail line between Bordeaux, Toulouse, and Dax sparks conflicting opinions. While some argue it will enhance regional connectivity and boost economic growth, others raise concerns about its cost-effectiveness and environmental impact.