Home » World » Russian Tu-95 and Tu-160 Bombers Dodge Strike, Hit “Left of the Big Boom” in Strategic Maneuver

Russian Tu-95 and Tu-160 Bombers Dodge Strike, Hit “Left of the Big Boom” in Strategic Maneuver

Ukraine’s Drone Strikes Deep into Russia: A New Strategy to Weaken Putin‘s War Machine

By World-Today-News.com Expert Journalist | march 21, 2025

As Russia’s war against Ukraine continues, kyiv is increasingly employing bold, long-range drone strikes targeting strategic assets deep within Russian territory. These attacks,echoing the U.S. military’s “left of boom” strategy, aim to disrupt Russia’s ability to wage war by targeting its supply lines, manufacturing capabilities, and air power at their source.

Targeting Russia’s Bomber Fleet: The Engels Airbase Raids

in a daring operation, Ukrainian forces have repeatedly targeted the Engels airbase, located approximately 300 miles (483 km) from the Ukrainian border in southern Russia. This base is a critical hub for Russia’s strategic bomber fleet, housing nuclear-capable Tupolev Tu-95 and Tu-160 aircraft.These bombers have been instrumental in launching missile strikes against ukrainian cities.

The most recent attack, the third in a series over ten weeks, reportedly ignited massive fuel and ammunition depots, triggering a chain of explosions.While the full extent of the damage remains unconfirmed,some reports suggest that the strikes may have destroyed a significant number of air-launched cruise missiles,crippling Russia’s ability to strike Ukrainian targets.

This “left of boom” strategy, as it’s known in U.S. military jargon, seeks to preemptively neutralize threats before they can be launched. As the original article stated,”In order to prevent the planting of roadside bombs in Iraq and Afghanistan,Americans have learned to overtake the problem and search the people who produce and distribute bombs.They sought to get ‘left’ from the attack on the time from left to right.”

For U.S. readers, this is akin to disrupting a terrorist cell before it can carry out an attack, rather than simply reacting to the aftermath. It’s a proactive approach to defense, aiming to dismantle the enemy’s capabilities before they can be used.

Expanding the target List: Drone Factories and Supply Depots

Beyond the Engels airbase, Ukraine has been actively targeting other strategic locations within Russia, including drone production facilities and ammunition warehouses. On or around March 13th, Ukrainian Defense Intelligence Agency drones struck a clandestine drone factory near Moscow, also about 300 miles (483 km) from the Ukrainian border. In April,a Ukrainian Aeroprakt A-22 aircraft reportedly attacked a drone plant in Elabuga,a staggering 550 miles (885 km) east of Moscow.

These strikes highlight Ukraine’s growing ability to project power deep into Russian territory, disrupting the production and supply of critical war materials. This strategy is especially critically important given the limitations of Ukraine’s air defense capabilities.

The Achilles’ Heel: Russia’s Air Defense Vulnerabilities

A key factor enabling these Ukrainian strikes is the apparent weakness of Russia’s air defense systems. Reports indicate that an eight-meter UKRSPECSYSTEMS PD-1 drone was spotted flying unhindered over Saratov, near the Engels airbase, either before or after the explosions. This raises serious questions about Russia’s ability to detect and intercept even relatively large,slow-moving drones.

The original article asks, “Where is the air defense?” This is a critical question, as the inability of russian air defenses to adapt to the threat of small, unmanned aerial vehicles is enabling ukraine to strike preemptively.

This vulnerability is particularly concerning for the U.S., which has invested heavily in air defense systems.The Ukrainian experience suggests that even advanced systems may struggle to counter the proliferation of inexpensive, readily available drones. This necessitates a re-evaluation of U.S. air defense strategies and investments.

Limited Air Defenses Force Ukraine’s Hand

Ukraine’s reliance on drone strikes deep inside Russia is, in part, a result of its limited air defense capabilities.Unable to effectively protect its own territory from Russian missile and drone attacks, Ukraine has adopted a strategy of striking at the source of the threat.

This situation mirrors, in some ways, the challenges faced by the U.S. in asymmetric conflicts. When facing an adversary with superior conventional military power, a weaker force may resort to unconventional tactics, such as long-range strikes against critical infrastructure.

Analysis: A High-Risk, High-Reward Strategy

Ukraine’s drone campaign is undoubtedly a high-risk, high-reward strategy.On the one hand, it carries the risk of escalating the conflict and provoking a more aggressive response from Russia. Conversely, it offers the potential to substantially weaken Russia’s war effort by disrupting its supply lines, damaging its military infrastructure, and undermining public morale.

The success of this strategy hinges on several factors,including the continued availability of drones,the effectiveness of Ukrainian intelligence,and the ability to overcome Russian countermeasures. It also depends on the willingness of the international community to continue supporting Ukraine’s defense efforts.

Recent Developments and Implications

Recent reports suggest that Russia is attempting to bolster its air defenses around key strategic sites, including the Engels airbase. However, it remains to be seen whether these measures will be sufficient to effectively counter the threat of Ukrainian drone strikes.

The ongoing drone war between Ukraine and Russia has significant implications for the future of warfare. It demonstrates the growing importance of unmanned systems, the vulnerability of critical infrastructure, and the potential for asymmetric warfare to disrupt even the most powerful militaries.

For the U.S.military, this underscores the need to invest in counter-drone technologies, improve the security of critical infrastructure, and train personnel on drone identification and response.It also highlights the importance of international collaboration in addressing the proliferation of drones.

Practical Applications and Further Inquiry

The lessons learned from the Ukrainian drone campaign have practical applications for U.S. homeland security. Protecting critical infrastructure, such as power grids and transportation hubs, from drone attacks is a growing concern. The U.S. can learn from Ukraine’s experience in developing and implementing counter-drone strategies.

Further research is needed to fully understand the long-term implications of drone warfare. This includes studying the effectiveness of different counter-drone technologies, the psychological impact of drone attacks on civilian populations, and the ethical considerations surrounding the use of autonomous weapons systems.

Ultimately, the Ukrainian experience is a stark reminder that modern warfare is evolving rapidly, and that innovation, adaptability, and international collaboration are essential for success.

Ukraine’s Daring Drone Strikes: Can They Truly Cripple Putin’s War Machine? An Expert Weighs In

To gain further insight into the strategic implications of Ukraine’s drone campaign,we spoke with Dr. Anya Petrova,a leading expert in military strategy and drone warfare.

Senior Editor, World-Today-News.com: The article’s focus on the “left of boom” strategy is compelling, which means preemptively neutralizing threats before they’re launched. How does this reflect a shift in military thinking, and what are its implications for future conflicts?

Dr.Anya Petrova: “The concept of ‘left of boom’ seeks to prevent the threats before they materialize and has become prominent, reflecting a significant shift in military thinking. Its implications for future conflicts include:

  • Proactive Defense: It prioritizes preemption and proactive defense measures, disrupting the enemy’s capabilities before they can be deployed.
  • Asymmetric Warfare: It underscores the importance of asymmetric warfare,where smaller forces can inflict significant damage by targeting the opposing side’s vulnerabilities,such as supply chains,infrastructure,or critical assets.
  • Technological Advantage: It highlights how the technological advantage in areas like drone technology, targeting, C4ISR, and electronic warfare can be key to military success.
  • Strategic Deterrence: With the increasing sophistication of unmanned systems, it could lead to the modification of deterrence strategies.”

Senior Editor, World-today-News.com: What are the key takeaways for the U.S. military and other armed forces worldwide,as they observe the ongoing drone war between Ukraine and Russia? what can be learned from the Ukrainian experience?

Dr. Anya Petrova: “The Ukrainian drone campaign offers several valuable lessons for the U.S. military and armed forces worldwide:

  • counter-Drone Technologies: Prioritizing the advancement of effective counter-drone technologies, including enhanced radar systems and electronic warfare capabilities.
  • Infrastructure Security: Improving the security of critical infrastructure against drone attacks.
  • Personnel Training: Training military personnel on drone identification and response.
  • International Collaboration: working with international partners to share details and coordinate efforts to counter the proliferation of drones.”

Dr. Petrova concludes, “Ultimately, the Ukrainian experience is a sharp reminder that modern warfare is changing rapidly, and that innovation, adaptability, and international collaboration are essential for success.”

Senior Editor, World-Today-News.com: This has been insightful,Dr. Petrova. thank you for your time today. Your insights provide a deeper understanding of the strategic implications of Ukraine’s drone campaign and the evolution of modern warfare.

What do you think? Is Ukraine’s drone strategy a game-changer? Share your thoughts and insights in the comments below.

video-container">


Ukraine’s Drone Strikes on Russia: Is This teh Future of Warfare? An Expert Weighs In

Could Ukraine’s daring drone strikes fundamentally reshape the landscape of modern conflict, and what critical lessons can the U.S. and other nations learn from this new era of warfare?

senior Editor, World-Today-News.com: Dr. Anya Petrova, welcome. The article highlights Ukraine’s bold strategy of using long-range drone strikes deep within russia. Let’s start with the bigger picture: How is this strategy, notably the “left of boom” approach, changing military strategy, and what does that mean for upcoming conflicts?

Dr. anya Petrova: Thank you for having me. the concept of “left of boom,” a concept that prioritizes disrupting threats before they materialize, is indeed reshaping military strategy. It signifies a pivotal shift. This includes:

Proactive Defense: “left of boom” prioritizes preemptive actions and proactive defense measures, aiming to neutralize the adversary’s capabilities before they’re used, instead of reacting to the damage.Think of preventing a fire versus putting it out.

Asymmetric Warfare: It emphasizes how smaller forces can considerably impact larger ones by targeting vulnerabilities. Drone strikes exemplify how a technologically advanced, yet relatively smaller, military can disrupt an opponent’s supply chains, infrastructure, or critical assets. This is key in asymmetric warfare.

Tech advantage: Technological superiority in areas such as drone technology, targeting systems, C4ISR (Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance), and electronic warfare can directly translate into military victories and successes.

Strategic Deterrence: As unmanned systems become more refined, we may see major modifications to how nations utilize deterrence strategies in the future and change the way countries consider their military plans.

Senior Editor, World-Today-News.com: The Ukrainian experiance has been quiet a learning case. From a global strategic perspective, what key takeaways should the U.S. military and other armed forces around the world consider as they observe the ongoing drone war between Ukraine and Russia?

Dr. Anya petrova: The Ukrainian drone campaign offers us several crucial lessons for the U.S. military and armed forces internationally:

Counter-drone Technologies: Prioritizing the development and deployment of effective counter-drone technologies becomes paramount. This includes enhanced radar systems, improved electronic warfare capabilities to disrupt drone communications, and physical countermeasures to intercept or destroy drones.

Infrastructure Security: Strengthening the security of critical infrastructure against drone attacks is essential. This calls for improved physical security measures, layered defense systems, and the development of response protocols and plans to quickly recover from attacks.

Personnel Training: Military personnel need appropriate training on how to identify and respond to threats from drones. Training should cover drone recognition,operating counter-drone systems,and establishing effective procedures for handling attacks,and the ability to fight through these attacks.

International Collaboration: International cooperation and information-sharing about drone threats, vulnerabilities, and best practices are critical to effectively counter the proliferation of drones.

Senior Editor, World-Today-News.com: Ukraine’s drone campaign is also impacting the U.S. homeland security. If you were advising the U.S. on adapting to this new reality, what specific recommendations would you provide to protect the nation and its critical assets?

Dr. Anya Petrova: The U.S. must urgently address these evolving drone threats with integrated and multifaceted strategies. My specific recommendations include:

Enhance Integrated Defense Systems: Implement layered defense systems to protect at-risk sites, including detection and dialog systems to monitor the airspace, advanced counter-drone technologies to eliminate threats, and highly trained security forces to respond to potential attacks.

Invest in Advanced Counter-Drone Technologies: To increase effectiveness, this includes electronic warfare systems to interfere with drone control and guidance signals; directed energy weapons, such as lasers or high-powered microwaves, to disable or destroy drones; and kinetic countermeasures that can physically destroy an incoming drone.

Improve Intelligence Gathering and analysis: Enhance strategies to monitor, assess, and report drone threats, which involves integrating information from various sources, including local, state, and federal intelligence agencies, as well as the private sector.

Foster Public-Private Partnerships: Promote collaborations between government agencies and private sector partners to advance counter-drone technologies, improve security protocols, and accelerate the effective integration of a counter-drone infrastructure.

Establish Regulatory Frameworks: The U.S. must create sensible regulations to govern the use of drones and counter-drone technologies, which can create standards for drone licensing and operation, while also giving clear guidelines on surveillance, privacy, and cybersecurity.

Conduct Regular Training Exercises: Regularly test and hone response capabilities with comprehensive training exercises that simulate various scenarios, incorporating diverse potential attack vectors, so security forces can understand, detect, and react when under pressure.

Senior Editor, World-Today-News.com: What crucial questions regarding the future of warfare still need further research or discussion, based on what we’re seeing unfold in Ukraine?

Dr. Anya Petrova: Several crucial questions require further inquiry:

Effectiveness of Counter-Drone Technologies: How well do different counter-drone technologies perform in diverse environments, against various types of drones, and under different conditions?

Psychological Impact: What are the long-term psychological effects of the drone attacks on civilian populations, and how can civil defenses prepare those communities?

Ethical Considerations: How do we resolve the ethical issues involving the use of autonomous weapons systems and the moral ramifications of drone warfare, specifically with regard to target selection, collateral damage, and accountability.

Impact of Asymmetric Warfare: How has the rise of asymmetric warfare, aided by drone technology, changed standard military doctrine and the capabilities of the military? How can conventional forces evolve and adapt?

Senior Editor, World-Today-News.com: Thank you,Dr. Petrova. This has been a interesting and critically important discussion. your insights are very insightful.

how are you seeing Ukraine’s drone strategies impact the broader conversation around modern warfare?

What lessons are you taking for the U.S. and Global communities, based on the points discussed during this interview? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

video-container">

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

×
Avatar
World Today News
World Today News Chatbot
Hello, would you like to find out more details about Russian Tu-95 and Tu-160 Bombers Dodge Strike, Hit "Left of the Big Boom" in Strategic Maneuver ?
 

By using this chatbot, you consent to the collection and use of your data as outlined in our Privacy Policy. Your data will only be used to assist with your inquiry.