Home » News » Miryang incident sufferer: “Even when I’ve to say one thing, I’ll do it myself…” Please take down YouTube”

Miryang incident sufferer: “Even when I’ve to say one thing, I’ll do it myself…” Please take down YouTube”

YouTuber ‘Pan Shuk’ stands by the decision, claiming he acquired the decision instantly from the sufferer of the Miryang center college lady gang rape case. /YouTube ‘Panseuk’

A YouTube channel launched the decision and the audio of the cellphone name, saying they acquired it instantly from the sufferer of the 2004 gang rape of a center college lady in Miryang, Gyeongsangnam-do. The sufferer requested for the video to be deleted, saying it was uploaded with out permission.

In line with the Korea Sexual Violence Aid Middle, one of many help teams for victims of the so-called ‘Miyang center college ladies’ gang rape case’, the sufferer’s youthful sister, Mr. A, despatched a unsolicited mail to her ‘Bobae Dream’ on-line neighborhood early within the morning of the ninth.

Mr. A mentioned, “The cellphone name posted within the YouTuber ‘Pansyuk’ video is actual in regards to the sufferer,” and added, “Nevertheless, the sufferer at the moment doesn’t have the power to make choices to do and has an mental incapacity.” He continued, “I did not get a incapacity take a look at in 2004, and I did not even know there was such a take a look at,” and added, “I am penning this after speaking to the undergo.”

A message from the sufferer of the Miryang center college lady’s gang rape case, asking YouTuber ‘Pan Suk’ to delete the video. / Boba’s dream

On the eighth, YouTuber ‘Pan Shuk’ uploaded a video displaying the voice of the sufferer and the decision, saying that he spoke on to the sufferer of the Miryang incident. Due to this fact, the sufferer requested that the video be deleted, however solely the audio a part of the decision within the video was deleted. As well as, the sufferer defined that the dialog he had with the operator of the channel was captured in a second video with out his consent.

Mr. A mentioned, “YouTuber ‘Panseok’ recorded the video utilizing the automated recording perform on his cellular phone when the sufferer contacted him 7 months in the past, and simply now he uploaded the video with out the sufferer’s consent the sufferer confirmed his identification by way of video “He mentioned he solely remembered components of it, together with saying he was sorry. ” When the sufferer requested him instantly, ‘Pansyuk’ mentioned he would delete the video, so Mr. A continued to speak with the YouTuber. Nevertheless, Mr. A mentioned that ‘Pansyuk’ expressed his disappointment, saying, “I used to be charged with organizing a one-man protest on the Uiryeong Police Station and visiting the soup restaurant (the place know that the perpetrator is working).

Mr. A mentioned, “The sufferer herself is having a tough time with a YouTube video that she does not even bear in mind now,” and requested, “They are saying if ‘Pansyuk’ had modified their voice , there would have been loads. of individuals saying it was manipulation, however is public opinion extra necessary than the sufferer? ” He mentioned, “I didn’t need the judgment to be made public and I requested that it not be used as info, and the cellphone name that was recorded within the second video was a cellphone name that I made , my youthful sister, pretending to be her sufferer. He mentioned, “Even when I communicate out, I’ll do it myself.” “Pansyuk,” he mentioned, “please chorus from mentioning this incident in any of your movies.

In response, ‘Pansyuk’ mentioned he was sorry however expressed his remorse. He mentioned on his YouTube channel on the tenth, “I wish to apologize to the sufferer and her household.” He continued, “I got here throughout an article written by the sufferer’s youthful brother I used to be interested by how this was totally different from the conduct of the sufferer, who known as me a number of occasions late within the morning and requested me to punish the perpetrators whereas I confirmed the video name. , identification card, and judgment.”

‘Pansyuk’ mentioned, “I felt a bit unfair once I noticed that the article was written though the video was edited. Nevertheless, I took down all of the movies associated to him as a result of I believed that importing the video would proceed to harm him. the sufferer if it was one thing the sufferer actually did not need.” He then added, “I’ll return to my function as a one-man activist on the Uiryeong Police Station and punish on the 44 individuals who dedicated the crime till the tip.”

Earlier than that, the YouTube channel ‘Narak Storage’ had the identical factor. Because the 1st, they’ve launched a video containing private info, claiming to be the perpetrators of the Miryang group sexual violence incident, and have sought the sufferer’s consent, the Korea Sexual Violence Aid Middle mentioned, “The sufferer was utterly unaware of the very fact till the primary video was posted, and the sufferer had no information of the very fact “No consent was ever requested,” he mentioned.

As controversy arose, ‘Narak Storage’ mentioned on the seventh, “As a result of honest request of the victims, we’re taking down all movies associated to Miryang. Nevertheless, sooner or later later, on the eighth, movies containing private info began being uploaded once more. The sufferer’s youthful sister requested that the video be taken down, however the sufferer’s youthful brother mentioned it was proper to make it public. ‘Narak Storage’ continues to add new movies, saying, “We’re eagerly ready for the victims to contact us.”

The Korea Sexual Violence Counseling Middle mentioned in a press launch on the seventh, “We elevate questions in regards to the conduct of the counseling heart and the sufferer with out confirming, listening to, or revealing the sufferer’s opinion from the start to finish. “

2024-06-09 22:28:10
#Miryang #incident #sufferer #myself.. #YouTube

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.