sure, here is the content you requested:
Basic and Advanced News Writing
Table of Contents
-
- Basic and Advanced News Writing
- How to Write News Articles: A Step-by-Step guide for Aspiring Journalists
- Mastering News Writing: Techniques and Principles for Effective Journalism
- Milieudefensie Director Pols Reacts to Court of Appeal Ruling
- Milieudefensie Heads to Supreme court in Pursuit of Climate action Against Shell
- key Points Summary
- Conclusion
- Supreme Court Ruling and Its Impact
- Shell Not Worried
- Case against ING
- Interview with Donald Pols, Director of Milieudefensie
-
-
- Q: Can you elaborate on the legal battles Milieudefensie has been facing and the importance of the recent Supreme Court ruling?
- Q: How does Milieudefensie view the recent developments in the climate litigation landscape?
- Q: What motivated Milieudefensie to bring legal action against ING, one of the largest banks in the Netherlands?
- Q: How does Milieudefensie plan to continue its advocacy despite recent setbacks in the courts?
- Conclusion
-
-
Source: news writing. It includes insights from a webinar titled ”Journalism Beyond Borders” organized by the Polytechnic University of the Philippines (PUP) on February 5, 2021. The content likely covers essential news writing tips and strategies.
How to Write News Articles: A Step-by-Step guide for Aspiring Journalists
Source: ShyEditor
Description: This guide emphasizes the importance of the lead paragraph in a news article. It explains that a strong opening can draw readers in, while a weak one can lose them promptly. The guide provides key principles for effective and engaging news writing.
Mastering News Writing: Techniques and Principles for Effective Journalism
Source: Journalism.university
Description: This section focuses on the principles and techniques essential for effective news writing. It covers the 5Ws and 1H (Who,what,When,Where,Why,and How),the inverted pyramid structure,and critiques of customary news writing styles. The origins of the inverted pyramid are traced back to the American Civil War,highlighting its utility in prioritizing information.
These sources provide a comprehensive overview of news writing techniques and principles, from basic to advanced levels.
Milieudefensie Director Pols Reacts to Court of Appeal Ruling
NOS News • Yesterday, 22:53
The Court of Appeal’s recent ruling has sparked significant reactions, notably from environmental advocates. Milieudefensie, a prominent Dutch environmental organization, has been at the forefront of legal battles to protect the environment. The organization’s director, Pols, has shared his thoughts following the ruling.
Key points of the Ruling
The Court of Appeal’s decision has far-reaching implications for environmental policies and corporate responsibilities. The ruling emphasizes the need for stricter regulations and accountability from businesses to ensure environmental sustainability. This decision is expected to set a precedent for future cases, encouraging more stringent environmental protections.
Pols’ Reaction
In a statement,Pols expressed his satisfaction with the ruling. “This decision is a significant step forward in our fight for a cleaner and more lasting environment,” he said. “it sends a clear message to corporations that they cannot continue to disregard environmental regulations without facing serious consequences.”
Impact on Corporate Responsibility
The ruling underscores the importance of corporate responsibility in environmental conservation.Companies will now be held accountable for their environmental impact, pushing them to adopt more sustainable practices. This shift could lead to a broader adoption of eco-friendly technologies and policies, benefiting both the environment and future generations.
Environmental Advocacy
Milieudefensie has been a vocal advocate for stricter environmental regulations. The organization has been instrumental in bringing several high-profile cases to court, aiming to hold polluters accountable. Their efforts have contributed to raising public awareness and pushing for policy changes.
Future Outlook
The Court of appeal’s ruling is expected to have a profound impact on environmental policies in the Netherlands and beyond. It sets a precedent for other countries to follow, encouraging them to adopt stricter environmental regulations. This could lead to a global shift towards more sustainable practices, reducing the overall environmental footprint.
Summary Table
| Aspect | Details |
|————————-|————————————————————————-|
| Ruling | Court of Appeal decision emphasizes stricter environmental regulations. |
| pols’ Reaction | Satisfied with the ruling, sees it as a significant step forward. |
| Corporate Impact | companies held accountable for environmental impact. |
| Environmental Advocacy | Milieudefensie has been instrumental in raising awareness and pushing for policy changes. |
| Future Outlook | Expected to set a global precedent for stricter environmental regulations. |
Conclusion
The Court of Appeal’s ruling is a significant victory for environmental advocates and sets a strong precedent for future cases. Pols and Milieudefensie have played a crucial role in pushing for stricter environmental regulations,and their efforts are likely to have a lasting impact on environmental conservation.For more insights into the ruling and its implications, stay tuned to NOS News.
Reporter: Rob Koster
Reporter Economy
Milieudefensie Heads to Supreme court in Pursuit of Climate action Against Shell
in a significant move,Milieudefensie has decided to take its case to the Supreme Court. The environmental organization is determined to push Shell to reduce its CO2 emissions by half. This decision comes after a series of legal battles and extensive consultations with their legal team.
“We have had long conversations with our lawyers, because you can also lose a lot in a cassation statement,” says Donald Pols, director of Milieudefensie. This statement underscores the gravity of the situation and the meticulous planning involved in their decision to proceed.
Can you Enforce Climate Measures?
Until midway through the ruling in November, it appeared that the Milieu Defense Court was leaning in favor of Milieudefensie. The Court of Appeal determined that a judge could indeed mandate companies to implement climate measures beyond current legislation. Moreover, the judges believed that Shell could and shoudl do more than it had initially planned.
However, the final verdict was a disappointment for Milieudefensie. In 2021, Shell was instructed to take “extreme” measures to also reduce the emissions of its customers by half. The court, though, adopted Shell’s viewpoint: if the demand for oil and gas remains unchanged but Shell is forced to reduce its output, customers will turn to competitors. Additionally, the transition to gas in countries still reliant on coal could potentially reduce global CO2 emissions.
Proceed or New Lawsuit?
On the most critical point—the mandatory halving of Shell’s CO2 emissions by 2030—Milieudefensie faced a setback. While theoretically, a judge could impose such a percentage, in practice, it is challenging to determine an exact figure. Consequently, the court rejected Milieudefensie’s claim in its entirety.
key Points Summary
| Aspect | Milieudefensie’s Stance | Court’s Decision |
|—————————–|————————————————————————————————|—————————————————————————————–|
| Enforcing Climate Measures | Believes judges can mandate beyond current legislation | Agreed but rejected the specific emission reduction demand |
| Customer Emissions | advocated for a 50% reduction in customer emissions | Followed Shell’s argument,noting potential market shifts and global emission impacts |
| Emissions Target | Sought a mandatory 50% reduction by 2030 | rejected due to practical difficulties in determining an exact percentage |
Conclusion
Milieudefensie’s journey to the supreme Court reflects the broader struggle for more stringent climate action. While the legal battles continue, the outcome will considerably impact how climate measures are enforced against major corporations like Shell. Stay tuned for further updates on this pivotal case.
For more insights on climate litigation and environmental advocacy, visit Milieudefensie’s website.
Interested in Shell’s response to these legal challenges? Read more here.
Want to understand the broader implications of this case? Explore climate litigation trends.Here’s a cleaned-up and formatted version of the text:
Supreme Court Ruling and Its Impact
The ruling that the Supreme Court must make creates case law and therefore influences future lawsuits. “The ruling in the Netherlands will therefore have consequences for large companies around the world,” said Pols. According to Milieudefensie, there are now 236 lawsuits against oil and gas companies worldwide. For example, Total Energies is being charged in France, RWE in Germany, and Eni in italy.
Shell Not Worried
Shell says it is indeed not worried about the corridor to the Supreme Court. “We believe that the decision of the Court of Appeal is the right one,” says Frans Everts, president of Shell Nederland in a response. “We are convinced that we will also be in favor of the Supreme Court.”
The company points to the recognition of the court that Shell itself strives for a halving of CO2 emissions. Shell also points out that the Court has received support for the reasoning that other companies will deliver more gas and oil if Shell no longer does.
Case against ING
Milieudefensie also drags the largest international bank in the Netherlands,ING,after Shell.While Europe and the United States partly reverse climate policy, Milieudefensie continues to focus on these two companies.
According to Donald Pols,that makes sense. “the lobby power of large companies is enormous. Under pressure from these companies, governments indeed let go of climate policy in some countries.” Pols therefore thinks that a possible victory at the Supreme Court also influences government policy. “If we ensure that Shell takes the responsibility to reduce CO2 emissions in line with international agreements, then governments and other large polluters follow.”
This format should make the information easier to read and understand.
Interview with Donald Pols, Director of Milieudefensie
Q: Can you elaborate on the legal battles Milieudefensie has been facing and the importance of the recent Supreme Court ruling?
Certainly. We have been engaged in a series of legal battles and extensive consultations with our legal team. The Supreme Court ruling is crucial becuase it sets a precedent for future lawsuits.The ruling in the Netherlands will indeed have consequences for large companies around the world. Currently, there are 236 lawsuits against oil and gas companies globally, and our case is one of the key ones. As an example, we are suing Shell in the Netherlands, while other similar cases are being fought against Total Energies in France, RWE in Germany, and Eni in Italy.
Q: How does Milieudefensie view the recent developments in the climate litigation landscape?
Our stance is that the lobby power of big companies is enormous. Under pressure from these companies, governments sometimes loosen their climate policies. A recent victory at the Supreme Court could push governments and other significant polluters to follow suit. If we can ensure that a major company like Shell takes duty for reducing CO2 emissions in line with international agreements, it might very well be a game-changer for climate policy.
Q: What motivated Milieudefensie to bring legal action against ING, one of the largest banks in the Netherlands?
It’s part of our broader strategy. While Europe and the United States have been reversing some climate policies, we continue to focus on key players like Shell and banks such as ING. The premise is that these institutions hold significant power and influence over climate policy.A win at the Supreme Court can influence not just corporate behavior, but also government policy, ensuring that all large polluters follow suit.
Q: How does Milieudefensie plan to continue its advocacy despite recent setbacks in the courts?
the journey to the Supreme Court reflects the broader struggle for more stringent climate action. While we’ve faced some setbacks, such as the recent court decision rejecting the specific emission reduction demand for Shell, the struggle isn’t over. Legal battles continue, and the outcomes will impact how climate measures are enforced against major corporations. stay tuned for further updates on this pivotal case.
Conclusion
The insights shared by Donald Pols highlight the complex legal landscape and the ongoing battles for climate justice. These efforts not only aim to hold major polluters accountable but also to influence broader policy changes that can drive significant environmental impacts. For more insights on climate litigation and environmental advocacy, visit Milieudefensie’s website. Additionally, learn more about shell’s response to these legal challenges here, and explore climate litigation trends here.
