Home » World » Milei and his failure with Susana Giménez: Monogamous or an old habit that returns to the scene

Milei and his failure with Susana Giménez: Monogamous or an old habit that returns to the scene

Embed –

FAILED, SLIP OR BAD CUSTOM

Although the statement about his “monogamy” was enough to generate comments regarding fidelity in relationships and the idea that being monogamous could be considered a “flaw,” what really ignited the debate was that initial “slip.”

Instead of going unnoticed, many users on social networks interpreted the beginning of “mogo—” as a veiled reference to the word “mogolic”, a deeply pejorative and offensive term due to the background of what it seeks to allude to.

Milei’s use of “mogolic” is not new to his repertoire. Before entering politics fully, he used to use it in a derogatory way to refer to his critics or those who did not share his ideas.

This use generated multiple reproaches from various sectors, which described it as stigmatizing and out of place, especially because it is a term that has historically been used to denigrate people with intellectual disabilities.

As his political career progressed, Milei abandoned this type of expression publicly, but its use in the past is not forgotten, and many believe that he continues to use it among his collaborators.

After this slip in the interview, many people on social networks began to comment on whether it was simply a phonetic error or if, subconsciously, Milei betrayed his own thinking, revealing his habit of using the term “Mogolic.”

Some suggested that his repeated public use of the term in the past might have influenced this “failure.”

Other users, mostly anonymous, reignited old discussions, using the term or variants such as “mword” or “mogword” to refer to Milei, a common practice on platforms where offensive expressions can lead to sanctions or cancellations.

Embed –

MILEI’S PARTICULAR USE OF LANGUAGE

This incident once again fuels the debate about the use of language and the responsibility of public leaders. Was it really an innocent mistake, or a hangover from his past outbursts? The digital community, always quick to react, is analyzing the event from all angles.

Some argue that Milei’s immediate correction shows that it was a simple verbal error without further implications.

Others, however, see in this “failure” a sign that old habits are difficult to leave behind, especially in a character as explosive as the president.

Embed –

In addition to the debate over the possible derogatory use of the term, the discussion also revolved around the classification of monogamy as a “defect.”

This statement surprised many, who considered it ironic that a libertarian president, who claims to be a defender of freedom in all aspects of life, would describe a personal choice in the area of ​​relationships as a defect.

The conversation on networks, mostly sarcastic, focused on Milei’s peculiar vision of fidelity, and several users questioned whether he really considered monogamy as a defect or if it was simply an unfortunate expression to be funny.

What began in his talk with Susana Giménez as a personal reflection on love relationships became a debate about the memory of language and the implications of words, in a context where any slip can become the center of controversy.

Embed –

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.