-Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol expressed his objection to the two-month disciplinary disposition, and filed a lawsuit for suspension of execution and cancellation to the administrative court the day before (17th). Accordingly, there is a growing interest in whether Yun can return next week.
According to the legal community on the 18th, attorney Wan-gyu Lee, a special attorney on the part of President Yoon, filed an electronic lawsuit with the Seoul Administrative Court the previous night at 9:20 am and filed a request for suspension of execution and a cancellation of disposition.
“Two months of honesty actually causes tangible and intangible damages equivalent to dismissal,” said President Yoon. “There is a concern that it may cause a major disruption in the investigation of important cases such as the Wolseong Nuclear Power Plant. There is,” he said.
It is interpreted that Yoon’s filing an electronic lawsuit after working hours is to return to work quickly. Earlier, when Minister of Justice Chu Mi-ae ordered a disciplinary request along with a disciplinary exclusion order on the 24th of last month, General Yoon’s side applied for suspension of the exclusion by electronic lawsuit on the night of the 25th. After that, the court made a citation decision in 6 days. In the meantime, President Yoon was able to return to the position of president after a week of exclusion. In light of this, the distribution of the court’s dividend for Mr. Yun’s request for suspension of disciplinary action is expected to be made this week as early as this week, and the interrogation date will be held in the next week at the latest. There is also a possibility that a decision will be made whether to return as early as the 25th, next Friday.
However, opinions in the legal profession differ as to whether the court will raise the hand of President Yoon as in the past. Some analyzes say that the possibility of citation is lower than that of disposition such as dismissal, dismissal, or 6 months of suspension. If Yun, who is in office until July of next year, returns after being suspended, he will remain in office for about four months.
Concerns are constantly raised that the Wolseong nuclear power plant case or investigations aimed at the regime such as Lime and Optimus due to the absence of President Yoon have been raised, and the court decided to cite it as’irreparable damage’ occurred regardless of the period of suspension. The possibility of lowering the price is also discussed.
Unlike the last case of exclusion from duties ordered by the Minister of Justice, this disciplinary disposition is a case that has been completed through the disciplinary committee and the President’s residence.
If the request for suspension of execution is dismissed, President Yun will not be able to work until mid-February next year, and the system of acting as Deputy Chief Prosecutor Nam-gwan Cho will be maintained. Some analysts say that if the inauguration of the airlift is completed during the period of suspension and related cases are transferred, it is judged that it is virtually impossible to perform the post of President Yun, so that he may immediately be elected as the successor president.
Drafting and distributing documents to the judiciary Δ Interference in the investigation and investigation of the Channel A case Δ’Deliberation and resolution summary’, which contains allegations of improper words and actions regarding political neutrality, also seems to be a major issue in applications for suspension of execution and revocation lawsuits.
The disciplinary committee judged that “the act of violating the’Personal Information Protection Act’ and the’Code of Conduct for Public Officials of the Prosecutors’ Office’ for President Yoon’s order to prepare and distribute the analysis document to the judge, It was the exact opposite of what it looked like a few years ago.”
On the other hand, President Yoon said, “It is an arbitrary guess without evidence that the’Judge’s document’ is used as a reason. There is no activity in violation of any prohibited acts or obligations related to political neutrality, and speculation and suspicion cannot be grounds for disciplinary action. He refuted.
(Seoul = News 1)
Copyright by dongA.com All rights reserved.
—
–
