GOOD Party Chairman Meral Akşener, was the guest of Turkey’s Pulse private Haberturk TV programs.
Speaking about the post of Constitutional Court (AYM) member Engin Yıldırım, “Lights are on”, Akşener said, “Did you feel the implication of a coup?” to the question, “Well, I don’t know. However, if this friend had paid $ 1 million on that tweet he was posting at the moment, it would not have helped the AK Party. It was a tweet that would stir the consciousness gold ”.
“THAT TWEET SCREENED A DISCUSSION IN A DIFFERENT WAY”
Akşener spoke as follows:
* I would like to express that I do not find it right for the bureaucrats, especially judges and prosecutors, to take a stand against politicians on social media, including all members of the Constitutional Court.
* Because then, hold on to a court case, you went to the gentleman that you went to, they would be in a state of grants, which I find very harmful.
* There was a debate about the Constitutional Court. This concerned friend evolved elsewhere with the ‘light’ tweet. While it was curtains in a different way in another debate, the noble and the number Bahceli he initiated discussion of the number I find very meaningful in terms of Turkey, I do not find the right.
* Turkey is a long time by destroying the institutions, the dignity of the place is managed by an angle of view. I do not find this right.
“MUST RESPOND”
To the question “Should a member of the Constitutional Court, Engin Yıldırım resign or initiate a disciplinary investigation”, Akşener gave the following answer:
* I think he should quit. My personal opinion. At a time when arrows were shot at the Constitutional Court from nothing …
* Bar associations came to the fore, bar associations were torn apart. Now a debate has started over the Constitutional Court. I think it is not right to act in a way that would justify that discussion.
* Moreover, among the members of today’s Constitutional Court, one person is formerly, the rest are all appointed and appointed people during this ruling.
“THIS PHILOSOPHY OF THE AYM CANNOT CHANGE”
Akşener continued as follows:
* You may not like the decisions made by the AYM. But you definitely apply the AYM’s decisions. It is such a mess that we are experiencing a legal and justice crisis, although it is discussed privately by Enis Berberoğlu.
* The Constitutional Court is the highest court to protect your rights individually, if we are all injured against power. This cannot happen when he tries to change his philosophy.
* We also know that in the past, the Constitutional Court stood with the guardians. But over time, each party learned a lesson and a certain point was reached. We see that institutions collapse one by one with the Presidency of the Party.
* I think that every step to be taken is not right except to correct those institutions, if they are lacking, to arbitrate in a legal sense, to gain independence. This attribute of AYM that protects us all must be maintained.
“BERBEROĞLU SHOULD RETURN TO ASSEMBLY, ABES OF SPY ACTION”
“Should Berberoğlu return to parliament?” Answering the question, Akşener said, “Of course he should return. This is my opinion ”and used the following expressions:
* Enis Berberoğlu is someone I know as a human. His trial for espionage is absurd.
* In the name of objectivity and democracy, I know what his wife has taken on Mr. Erdogan as a journalist in his most difficult time.
* They are not a type of person in the form of espionage, blow. I do not understand what was asked of Enis Berberoğlu. I believe that the subject of this place is not Enis Berberoğlu.
