The Duchess of Sussex chose an unflattering red dress this week for the gala in favor of American veterans
Are they fleeing the press or are they running towards it? This is what anyone observing the activities and statements of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex may wonder. Until recently two of the most valued figures of the British Royal Family, now they have become a source of “Real” contradictions and upsets. Meghan’s striking outfits do not help convey the message of discretion and naturalness that they want to pass.
Meghan Markle, who as a child lived in a very simple environment, when she landed in the sphere of cinema and television she ran to make arrangements and adopted a somewhat inelegant rococo style, with dresses with high necklines, extreme miniskirts, flowing hairstyles and exaggerated makeup. But meeting Prince Harry, his fashion contacts, and advisers from the British Royal Family influenced the sweetening of their attire.
She began to wear Givenchy, whose artistic director was then the British Clare Waight Keller, choosing in the Parisian house her wedding dress and many other important outfits, such as the delicious beige set with mini capeline that she wore when she accompanied the queen for the first time. Isabel alone.
But fleeing the British Royal Family and starting to drift in their outfits was all one. Already in the morning and country interview with Oprah Winfrey in Santa Barbara, she chose black stilettos with 11-centimeter heels, shiny as jewels and a long black dress while the famous American journalist wore corduroy pants and rubber-soled boots.
This week, Markle has once again attracted attention. Although they usually declare that they are fleeing the press, the Sussexes allow themselves to be interviewed in their urbanization, Montecito, make frequent public statements or come to New York, like this week, where they have gone to participate in the gala in favor of the veteran military Americans.
And there Meghan Markle has stood out, but for the worse. Among the flaws in his styling were:
1. A “sternon” type neckline, to call it somehow, which divided its poitrine into two zones, as happened to the robot Aphrodite ‘A’ in Mazinger-Z. Unnecessary for a woman who claims to defend the British Crown and respect her husband’s grandmother, Queen Elizabeth of England.
2. Girl Volumen. The back layer of Meghan Markle’s dress created great flare around her hips and derrière, making it wider and thicker.
3. Either up or down. The long slit of her skirt was added to the low neckline, violating a protocol maxim that is also in line with the most flattering outfits: if you wear a neckline, do not show much leg, or if you show a lot of leg, do not exaggerate with the neckline. This double gap in her dress shortened her figure and kept her from being long.
4. Rear Lorza. When the Duchess of Sussex had an entourage of 20 assistants, within the royal family, all the clothes that she bought, ordered or wore were impeccable, since the big brands offer tailoring services or tailor-made pieces. whereas in Kensington they always had seamstresses on hand. Now it is evident that Meghan does not have this help and chooses a dress with a low cut in the front and in the back that creates a “lorza” effect on the back.
5. Picked up tonadillera. Suspended to the point of saying enough and with a glossy finish of tonadillera in the 80s, the excessively pristine collected of Meghan collides with the fashion that she imposed to carry buns relaxed with loose strands.
–