The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are caught in a new media turmoil. While in New York to attend the awards ceremony Women of Vision AwardsPrince Harry, Meghan Markle and his mother Doria Ragland would have found themselves chased by paparazzi hired by the agency Backgrid, in order to capture the best shots for the tabloids. The couple’s spokesperson then described a scene worthy of an action movie, and assured that the outcome of this pursuit of “more than two hours could have been catastrophic”. This Friday, May 19, the online media Page Six revealed what could be the real cause of this unpleasant end to the evening. Meghan and Harry would be “too stingy“.
While he was to stay at The Carlyle hotel – Princess Diana’s favorite hotel – the Sussex couple would have finally changed their minds. And for good reason, according to a police source, the management of the hotel would have refused to lower the price of the room at the request of Harry and Meghan. Which would have led them to finally stay with a friend on the Upper East Side. So in reality, if the prince and the former actress filmed for more than two hours in a taxi, then in a car of their bodyguard, it would have been to prevent journalists from knowing that they were not. ultimately had no prestigious place to stay. To this hypothesis, the anonymous source had added: “They should have found a hotel for everyone’s safety. Instead, they were stingy and preferred a free place to stay.”
Harry vs. Backgrid
As of May 17, the couple’s spokesperson assured that: “This dogged pursuit, which lasted more than two hours, resulted in multiple near-misses, involving other drivers on the road, as well as pedestrians and two NYPD officers.” Nevertheless, statements from the police, the Backgrid agency and their own taxi all go against of this incredible testimony.
And if the Sussexes demanded from the photography agency that all the photos and videos captured be returned to them, the latter replied through their lawyer: “In America, as you may know, property belongs to its owner: third parties cannot demand that they be provided to them, as arguably kings can.” And to add: “These English royal prerogatives, whereby citizens are asked to donate their property to the Crown, were rejected by this country long ago. We remain faithful to our Founding Fathers.” In other words, the mass is said.
Article written in collaboration with 6Medias.
2023-05-20 16:22:52
#Harry #Meghan #Markle #York #real #reason #chase #Gala
