Home » Technology » Mars a hopeless fall – therefore the planet lost its water

Mars a hopeless fall – therefore the planet lost its water

Why did the red planet lose its ocean? A new study suggests that the dimension made Mars a hopeless case.

Science has known that Mars was once covered by an ocean. NASA’s rovers Curiosity and Perseverance have sent pictures of the tracks after the water in the form of canals and river valleys, but we have not come closer to an explanation as to why it disappeared.

The theories are many, and in a new study, Washington University in St. Louis now his own. The researchers suggest that there is a limit to how small a rocky planet can be to retain enough water to be habitable and sustain tectonic plates. Mars simply has too small a volume. It writes the university in one press release.

To investigate the presence of volatile substances on various planetary bodies, the research group has looked at stable isotopes of potassium. It is an element which in itself is volatile but which can act as a trace element for even more volatile things such as water. They measured isotopes of potassium in 20 March meteorites that were allowed to represent an average of the planet’s composition.

– Mars meteorites have an age ranging from several hundred million years to four million years, and have thus captured the evolution around Mars volatile substances. By measuring the isotopes of moderately volatile substances, such as potassium, we can make assumptions about the degree of loss of volatile substances in planets with large masses and compare this with other bodies in the solar system, says Kun Wang, who is the lead author of the study.

Read more: The countdown is approaching for Starship’s decisive launch

Scientists’ conclusion about Mars

The scientists’ conclusion was that Mars lost more potassium and other volatiles than Earth when the two planets were formed, while smaller bodies such as our dry moon and the asteroid 4-Vesta lost even more than Mars. This supports the theory of size versus the ability to hold water, according to the research group.

The study concludes that only planets in a fairly narrow range have the right size to hold a reasonably large amount of water to be habitable. The knowledge can be useful when hunting for interesting exoplanets.

The study has been published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Pnas.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.