Home » today » World » Marinakis in a panic: “No new ban” on broadcasts of the proceedings – Assault on journalists and reviews of defamatory posts – 2024-07-13 16:37:19

Marinakis in a panic: “No new ban” on broadcasts of the proceedings – Assault on journalists and reviews of defamatory posts – 2024-07-13 16:37:19

Pavlos Marinakis appeared in a panic on the briefing for political editors, as when he was requested in regards to the authorities’s modification that prohibits the broadcasting of courtroom proceedings over the web, on account of which observatories are “blocked”, such because the one which broadcasts the trial of Golden Daybreak or the trial of his homicide Zak Kostopoulou, spoke about slanderous posts and that there’s “no prohibition”.

Particularly, to a query from Documentonews, Pavlos Marinakis said that “as a result of I noticed the announcement of SYRIZA and the New Left, which is definitely essentially the most spectacular factor, this modification, that we are going to clarify what this modification is, though I’ve issued a related announcement, however after which a slanderous put up, a deceptive put up, by reportersunited.gr, is probably additionally a solution to why Greece comes out decrease within the rankings than nations which have authoritarian regimes, as a result of merely these investigations are carried out on foot, both with the purpose of slandering the federal government of the nation, due to this fact the nation. I’ve right here in entrance of me the supply of 2002, which refers to a legislation of 1993. So what was in power from 1993 with an replace in 2002. “The whole or partial broadcast by tv, radio, in addition to the movie and recording of the trial earlier than a felony, civil or administrative courtroom is prohibited. Exceptionally, the courtroom can enable these actions if the prosecutor and the events agree and there’s a necessary public curiosity”. And the supply of 2024 says “the primary paragraph of paragraph 1 of article 8, that’s, what I learn to you is changed and paragraph 1 is formulated as follows “whole, partial transmission by any means, particularly via tv, radio, web and usually any technological means, in addition to filming, taping, recording and capturing the trial in a written textual content via particular software program that converts the oral speech right into a written one earlier than a felony, civil administrative courtroom. In different phrases, new media are launched that didn’t exist in 1993 and 2002. Exceptionally, because the earlier type of the supply says, the courtroom can enable these actions, if the prosecutor, the events agree and there’s a substantial public curiosity”.

“Non-Current Matter”

The truth is, Pavlos Marinakis questioned in regards to the new ban made by the Ministry of Justice. “The opposition voted for it and denounced it and it was picked up by varied broadcasters who slander Greece everywhere in the world and made a problem which is non-existent”, he added.

In an statement by Documentonews that professors like Mr. Kontiadis level out that “based on article 93 of the Structure the conferences of every courtroom should be public, until the courtroom judges by its choice that the publicity goes to be dangerous to morals or that there are particular causes to guard the personal or household lifetime of the events” the federal government consultant mentioned that “trials stay public, until the courtroom decides in any other case, i.e. they’re held behind closed doorways of some heinous crimes. Conferences stay public. We’re speaking about its tv, radio or web broadcast”

Authorized debate on the limitation of publicity

Lastly, in one other Documentonews touch upon why publicity needs to be restricted solely to the extent of the courtroom and never each citizen has the precise to data, Pavlos Marinakis mentioned that “this can be a dialogue that has to do with the rights of the accused . It’s a debate that begins in 1993. Then the state determined. It’s a authorized dialogue that isn’t a call of the Mitsotakis authorities”.

The response to publicity within the trials from 13:15 to 19:00 of the video

Learn additionally:

Mitsotakis spoke of “gaps within the protection” however Marinakis sees SYRIZA’s “innovative”

Asimakopoulos Scandal: Nikos Theodoropoulos denies his involvement and publicly threatens revelations

Katrinis: “PASOK isn’t a wildcard or authorities associate in a authorities with the ND”


#Marinakis #panic #ban #broadcasts #proceedings #Assault #journalists #reviews #defamatory #posts

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.