Even if many big names are already being traded (Conte, Zidane, etc.), I would give United a surprise tip: Terzic !!!
That would bring fresh, young wind into the team. He can really bring fire to a club and can also with the many young talents that ManU has (and he would get Sancho back in shape like we did back then).
In addition, he already has experience in BuLi and also in England. Should he get along with Ronaldo, it would be a great combination and he could really make a difference. German coaches are currently popular in the Premier League anyway.
I would give him a coaching post! He really delivered to us and only had to take a step back because Rose was already in the starting blocks.
–
Is the statement sarcasm?
We’re talking about Manchester United, the next coach has to be seated.
Terzic is a maximally slightly above average coach who hardly has a reputation that Ronaldo and co. to need.
–
Mourinho, van Gaal had a hard time in Manchester. OGS – a club icon has a hard time.
Zidane and Conte would have a hard time.
Now Terzic should go there
Success: a good half-season in Dortmund.
–
Maybe the club should finally rethink it if all the old, well-known coaches don’t make it. Then it may be down to the structure of the club and the mentality. A new, young coach could provide a new start … IF he was given a real chance …
–
I agree with you, but not Terzic!
At least there is nobody who comes along with a vision and can implement a sensible system
–
You don’t have to share my opinion, but for me Terzic would be exactly the right man for it!
–
Maybe take off the fan glasses. Terzic did his job pretty well for six months, but equating him with world coaches and glossing over one of the largest clubs in the world is a size too big and then has nothing to do with reality. It would be like talking to Thomas Reis about Manchester City as Guardiola’s successor.
Maybe FC Barcelona also need Bruno Labbadia? Chelsea Steffen Baumgart? Or Juventus Thomas Schaaf?
–
Your comparisons can only be meant as a joke and cannot be taken seriously. Terzic has successfully trained one of the largest clubs in Europe with Dortmund. What is a comparison with Thomas Reis etc.?
If every big club is only allowed to hire renowned coaches, how are such coaches supposed to follow suit? Somebody has to get a chance to prove themselves. It wasn’t any different with Tuchel and Klopp, wasn’t it?
–
To get to the point now, your Terzic hype is completely exaggerated, he had a good second half at BVB, that’s all he has to show in his career. This second half of the season was a free shot for him, it was clearly communicated from the start that it doesn’t matter how it goes, he was able to work almost completely without pressure. He was like the nice substitute teacher who was allowed to unpack the board games.
That should by no means mean that he is not a good coach, but his name is enough (for the time being) at most for the Bundesliga. First he should take over a club in the Bundesliga, prove his qualities there for many years and only then can you talk about the next steps.
Apart from that, BVB is not one of the largest clubs in Europe in terms of sport.
All sustainably good coaches from the Bundesliga, whether Klopp, Tuchel or Nagelsmann, have worked their way up step-by-step (Mainz -> Dortmund -> Liverpool, Mainz -> Dortmund -> PSG -> Chelsea, Hoffenheim -> RB Leipzig – > FC Bayern Munich).
Terzic is still years away from that, he now has at most the qualification to prove himself for the first step. Nobody knows how Terzic develops a team over the long term, how he completes summer preparation, how he integrates himself into the transfer process, whether he can establish, promote and integrate talent in the long term in professional football or whether he can really keep up tactically at the top. How can you equate the one coach like Conte, who was champion in every league in which he worked, and Zidane, who has virtually subscribed to the CL title, with a Terzic or prefer Terzic? It’s okay if you like Terzic, if you appreciate him and he’s an exceptional coach for me, but in the end you should still be able to look at it realistically. The only thing missing is that you settle Terzic through Sir Alex Ferguson.
–
Unfortunately, your contribution went a little too far. I didn’t put Terzic on the same level as Conte or Zidane, nor over Ferguson. You seem to have not read / understood my posts. I AM OF THE OPINION that a young, unspent trainer has to take the helm at ManU, and I see Terzic as a possible candidate that I could personally imagine. With Conte and Zidane I could just as easily imagine a course as I did recently with Mourinho etc.
Your opinion on Terzic’s performance is also blatantly superficial and extremely speculative. With the way you could break any coach / player.
Talented coaches must also be encouraged and given a chance. If you were to do the same with the players, a Sancho would not be allowed to play until he is at least 28 and has previously played for Mainz, Gladbach and Dortmund. So the logic behind your statements is very questionable …
–
Phew, the only one who lacks logic is you.
You say his opinion on Terzic is blatantly superficial and speculative. YOUR opinion is that he would manage ManUtd just that: speculative! Nobody of us knows how Terzic would do outside of Dortmund over one or more seasons, nobody knows how good he really is as a trainer in practice, the only thing you know is that he can bring enough motivation and fire to help him in his heart club to accelerate again in the last half series.
And no, with logic you can’t break every player / coach, because there is a huge difference to the young Klopp / Tuchel / Nagelsmann etc. They have several seasons as coaches behind them, they have gained experience which for an overall impression are much more expressive than a half series under extremely special circumstances at Terzic.
Of course, talented coaches have to be encouraged. But not as the first real stop a club like ManUtd with this environment. That would be SO speculative that no one responsible for such an association would take the risk. Bayern Munich would also be too high, for example, because again: the difference between good young coaches and Terzic is that Terzic only ASSUMES that he is one of them, but a half series is just no proof.
And to compare players with coaches like in your last sentence …. sorry but more than 
I don’t say yes.
You can and may absolutely be of the opinion that Terzic would be one for ManUtd, but also accept other opinions, especially if they are “more logically” substantiated than your speculative opinion. 
– .
