BMW Driver’s Whiskey Gambit Backfires in insurance claim
Table of Contents
In a bizarre twist, a BMW driver’s attempt to outsmart the system after a car accident has backfired spectacularly, resulting in the denial of his insurance claim. The driver, involved in a single-car accident in June 2022, chose an unconventional method to potentially avoid a DUI charge: he consumed several glasses of whiskey after the incident.
The accident, which totaled the BMW, occurred on the night of June 9-10, 2022, as the driver was entering a highway on-ramp. After escaping the wrecked vehicle by breaking a window, he was picked up by his girlfriend. While emergency services were en route, alerted by the car’s automatic crash notification system, the driver opted not to wait. According to court documents, he cited being “ice cold and wet” as his reason for leaving the scene before help arrived.
The crucial detail? In the approximately ten minutes between arriving home and the police’s arrival, the driver consumed two to three glasses of whiskey. This action, intended to potentially skew the results of a breathalyzer test, ultimately became the central point of contention in his insurance claim.
Court Challenges Driver’s Actions
The court found the driver’s description unconvincing. The judge questioned the driver’s claim of being too cold to wait for emergency services, suggesting he could have waited in his girlfriend’s car. The court’s judgment stated,”it is obvious that {plaintiff} would stay here.” Furthermore, inconsistencies in the driver’s statements regarding how his girlfriend located him after the accident further damaged his credibility. He initially claimed to have called her himself, but later admitted she used the “find my iPhone” function after he lost his phone in the accident.
The driver’s failure to cooperate with the insurance company, Ansvar, also played a significant role in the court’s decision.He refused to answer questions about the breathalyzer test and the subsequent confiscation of his driver’s license, despite claiming to possess documents that could clarify the situation. The judge deemed his failure to provide these documents when requested “incomprehensible.”
The driver had sought €75,249 from ansvar—the difference between the car’s residual value and its purchase price in 2021—but the court ruled against him, upholding the insurance company’s denial of the claim.This case serves as a cautionary tale about the potential consequences of attempting to circumvent legal processes, even in seemingly desperate situations.
This incident highlights the importance of responsible behavior following a car accident. While the specifics of this case are unusual, the underlying principle remains consistent: honesty and cooperation with authorities and insurance companies are crucial in navigating the aftermath of a car accident.
insurer Rejects Claim, citing Driver’s Lack of Cooperation
A driver is facing a significant financial setback after their insurance company, Ansvar, denied coverage for a holiday accident. The denial stems from the driver’s alleged lack of cooperation during the claims process, highlighting the importance of fully engaging with insurers following an incident.
According to sources familiar with the case, the inquiry into the accident revealed a critical detail: “it became clear that Ansvar did not want to provide cover for the accident.” This statement underscores the insurer’s assessment of the driver’s actions during the investigation.
The lack of cooperation proved costly for the driver. The insurer’s decision not only resulted in the denial of the claim but also imposed additional financial burdens. The driver is now responsible for reimbursing Ansvar’s legal fees, amounting to approximately €5,500. This translates to roughly $5,700 USD, a substantial sum for many individuals.
The incident serves as a cautionary tale for drivers involved in accidents. Fully cooperating with insurance investigators is crucial to ensuring a smooth claims process. Failure to do so can lead to claim denials and significant financial penalties, as seen in this case.
The accident occurred during a period of heavy fog, a condition that contributed to numerous accidents during the holiday season. “Heavy fog caused many accidents during the holidays,” a statement reflecting the challenging driving conditions prevalent at the time.
This case mirrors similar situations in the U.S. where failure to cooperate with insurance investigations can result in claim denials. Drivers should always be prepared to provide accurate and complete information to their insurers following an accident. This includes promptly reporting the incident, providing necessary documentation, and cooperating fully with any investigations.
When Whiskey Backfires: Expert Discusses Insurance Denials After Accidents
Many assume that insurance companies are out to make things difficult for claimants after an accident. But sometimes, typically during a claim inquiry, it’s the actions of the driver that lead to a denied claim. This was dramatically showcased in a recent case where a BMW driver’s gamble with whiskey after a single-car accident ended up costing him dearly.
we sat down with Angela Rivera, a certified insurance claims adjuster with over 15 years of experience, to understand the complexities of this unusual case and the broader implications for drivers involved in accidents.
world-Today-News: Angela, this case caught attention for the driver’s peculiar attempt to conceal a possible DUI by consuming alcohol after the accident. Could you explain why an insurance company would deny a claim based on such actions?
Angela Rivera: Insurance policies require honest reporting of events surrounding an accident. In most cases, insurance companies try to assess the situation fairly.They investigate the details to determine financial responsibility for damages.
In this situation, the driver’s actions raised serious red flags. Firstly, leaving the scene prematurely, even though safe, wasn’t optimal due to the lack of cooperation with authorities.
Secondly,consuming alcohol after the accident—clearly an attempt to manipulate a potential sobriety test—indicates an intention to mislead,and that’s a serious breach of the policy’s good faith clause.
World-Today-News: The driver claimed
he was cold and wet, which is why he left the scene. How did the court view this clarification?
Angela Rivera: While understandable on one level,the court saw it as an insufficient justification for leaving the scene before emergency
services arrived. It raised concerns about the driver trying to hide something, further contributing to the decision to deny the claim.
World-Today-News: This case seems unique, but are there any broader lessons for drivers about what they should and shouldn’t do after an accident?
Angela Rivera: Absolutely. Transparency and
cooperation are key. Call the police, exchange information with other parties involved, and document everything. Stay at the scene until released by authorities, and be honest with your insurance company during the investigation.
Remember, insurance companies aren’t looking to punish individuals,
but they need accurate information
to process claims fairly.
Attempting to manipulate the situation, as in this case, will likely backfire, leading
to claim denials and potentially even legal repercussions.
World-Today-News: Thank you, Angela, for clarifying these crucial points. Hopefully, this story serves as a reminder for drivers
to act responsibly and honestly in the aftermath of accidents.
