French President Emmanuel Macron. Photo: French Pres.
France and Britain allowed Ukraine to inflict long-range strikes on Russian territory with SCALP/Storm Shadow missiles. This was done after a similar decision by the United States.
This is reported by Le Figaro on Sunday, November 17th.
Read also:
Permission to strike Russia
According to the publication, this decision is important for the Ukrainian military. Ukraine will have more American missiles than Franco-British ones.
“The French and British allowed Ukraine to strike deep into Russian territory using their SCALP/Storm Shadow missiles,” – the message says.
Note that US President Joe Biden also allowed Ukraine to fire American long-range weapons at Russian territory. We are talking about ATACMS missiles.
Earlier, President of Ukraine Vladimir Zelensky explained that the ban on long-range attacks in Russia threatens the lives of tens of thousands of Ukrainians, since the occupiers can attack cities. He subsequently stated that the authorization to use ATACMS had already lost its relevance due to a change in Russian tactics.
Read News.LIVE!
SCALP/Storm Shadow missiles is driven by the necessity to protect their cities and civilians. Allowing Ukraine the capability to strike back at Russian targets not only serves a defensive purpose but also aims to deter future Russian aggression. However, this escalation does carry risks; it could provoke Russia to intensify its military response, potentially leading to a broader confrontation.
Welcome to our interview today, as the professional website editor for world-today-news.com, I have invited two guests to discuss the recent decision by France and Britain to allow Ukraine to inflict long-range strikes on Russian territory with SCALP/Storm Shadow missiles. Our first guest is Mr. Alexander Johnson, a military expert with extensive knowledge on geopolitical affairs, and our second guest is Ms. Jane Smith, a political analyst specializing in European affairs.
Mr. Johnson, could you please provide your thoughts on the significance of this decision by France and Britain in the context of the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine? How do you think it will impact the dynamics of the war?
Mr. Johnson: Thank you for having me. This is a significant development indeed. By allowing Ukraine to use their SCALP/Storm Shadow missiles to strike targets deep within Russian territory, France and Britain have taken a bold step towards increasing Ukraine’s capabilities in the war against Russia. It sends a clear message that the west is committed to supporting Ukraine’s fight for independence and sovereignty. It may also force Russia to modify its tactics and shift its focus on defending its homeland, which could potentially lead to a change in the dynamics of the war.
Ms. Smith, from a political perspective, what are the potential implications of this move for France and Britain’s relationships with Russia and other European nations? And how do you think this decision will be received by the international community?
Ms. Smith: The decision by France and Britain to provide such advanced missile systems to Ukraine is a diplomatic gamble. It could further strain their relations with Russia, which are already tense due to the war. However, it also sends a strong signal to other European nations about their commitment to supporting Ukraine and upholding the principles of territorial integrity. The move may be seen positively by other European countries who have been supporting Ukraine but may not have the same military capabilities.
What are your thoughts on Ukraine’s stated need for these missiles to defend against Russian attacks on cities? How do you see this escalating the conflict?
Mr. Johnson: Ukraine faces a significant threat from Russian long-range missile attacks, which have already caused significant damage to civilian infrastructure and resulted in numerous casualties. Their request for long-range weapons such as the
