On Thursday, VG wrote that the Norwegian industry chief warns that employers ought to use the locks to a higher extent. Now LO is so provoked by NHO’s approach that they are suspending cooperation till even further discover.
Current only now
–
– I am angry, astonished and provoked, writes the leader of LO Peggy Assia Følsvik to VG.
In the VG scenario, it emerges that Stein Lier-Hansen, chief of the NHO Norsk Industri association, applied a lockout danger to force LO to stop the industrial strike. Warns that the block really should develop into respectable to use as a strike.
– Now let’s just end conference NHO in all contexts. Now we deleted a match in VG. So we must meet at the ONS future 7 days, but there are still some clarifications to be made in advance of I can fulfill the head of the NHO.
Følsvik apologizes before seeking to meet up with NHO manager Ole Erik Almlid all over again, he writes Immediately after article.
NHO chief Ole Erik Almlid tells VG that NHO normally takes LO’s response to Alvor.
– There have to be mutual have confidence in amongst LO and NHO, and it is my duty as an NHO leader to contribute to this, he claims.
Request clarification from the NHO manager
Block it is some thing that companies can use to connect with for an stop to a workers’ strike: it implies that employers exclude staff from their positions, even people who are not on strike.
It has customarily been a historical resource that designed social unrest in the 1930s and a political storm in 1986, when the forerunner of NHO, the Norwegian Employers’ Affiliation, locked in excess of 100,000 LO-structured employees out of their sites of work. operate. It ended with the resignation of the head of the NAF.
– I have to talk to Ole Erik Almlid if this announces a new line from NHO. He has to occur to the scene and explain regardless of whether it is NHO’s intention to maximize the degree of conflict, or no matter if this is coming from an specific in the NHO method, suggests Følsvik.
He claims it is suitable that Lockout is a device that companies can use in a conflict situation, in the exact same way that unions can strike.
– But I would like to warn in opposition to the idealization of the use of these equipment. On the personnel side we will strike if needed, but we always try our ideal to stay away from it, he suggests.