More than a thousand days after the invasion of Ukraine by the Russian army, on February 24, 2022, the war is at a turning point with the fire given by the United States to the use of long-range missiles and the decision by current US President Joe Biden to send anti-personnel mines in support of Ukraine? The question animates many observers.
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin explained the U.S. decision to supply antipersonnel mines to Ukraine as a change in Russia’s battlefield tactics, with Moscow increasingly favoring infantry.
“Their mechanized forces are no longer in the lead. They advance on foot in order to approach and do things to clear the way for the mechanized forces“, Lloyd Austin told journalists during a visit to Laos, a country long ravaged by this type of weaponry. The Ukrainians “need things that can help slow down this effort on the part of the Russians“, he added as the advance of Russian troops accelerates in eastern Ukraine.
The International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL) immediately denounced a “disastrous” decision on Wednesday. The group, winner of the Nobel Peace Prize in 1997, claimed that it “will endeavor to get the United States to reverse its decision.”.
Follow our live stream dedicated to the war in Ukraine below:
What legal and diplomatic avenues, beyond the ethical arguments presented by Mr. Campbell, could be pursued by the international community to pressure the US to reconsider its decision and uphold the principles of the Ottawa Treaty?
## The Turning Point: A World Today News Interview on US Aid to Ukraine
**Introduction:**
Today, we delve into the complex and controversial issue of the United States’ latest decision to provide Ukraine with anti-personnel mines in its ongoing war with Russia. Joining us today are two esteemed guests with diverse perspectives:
* **Dr. Anya Petrova**, a renowned international security expert specializing in Eastern Europe and conflict resolution.
* **Mr. David Campbell**, founder of the humanitarian organization “Landmine Survivors Network”, dedicated to supporting victims of landmine explosions.
**Section 1: Shifting Tactics on the Battlefield:**
* **Host:** Dr. Petrova, Secretary Austin mentioned Russia’s shift towards infantry tactics. What strategic implications does this shift have for the battlefield, and how do you interpret the US decision to supply Ukraine with anti-personnel mines in this context?
* **Host:** Mr. Campbell, while recognizing the changing battlefield dynamics, what are your immediate concerns about the deployment of anti-personnel mines, especially given the long-term humanitarian consequences, even in a conflict situation?
**Section 2: The Ethics and Morality of Weaponry:**
* **Host:** Dr. Petrova, the International Campaign to Ban Landmines has condemned the US decision as “disastrous.” How do you reconcile the need to support Ukraine against an aggressor with the ethical dilemma posed by the indiscriminate nature of anti-personnel mines?
* **Host:** Mr. Campbell,
can you please elaborate on the lasting impact of anti-personnel mines on civilian populations, even after a conflict ends? How does this factor into the debate surrounding their use?
**Section 3: International Legality and Precedent:**
* **Host:** Dr. Petrova, what are the likely international reactions to the US decision? Will it set a precedent for other nations to supply similar weaponry to their allies in future conflicts?
* **Host:** Mr. Campbell, considering the weight of the 1997 Ottawa Treaty banning anti-personnel mines, what legal and ethical arguments could be presented to persuade the US to reconsider its position?
**Section 4: Looking Ahead:
Possible Alternatives and
Long-Term Solutions:**
* **Host:** Dr. Petrova, beyond anti-personnel mines, what other military or non-military strategies could Ukraine utilize to counter Russia’s evolving tactics?
* **Host:** Mr. Campbell,
what role can the international community play in promoting dialog and finding long-term solutions to the conflict, while minimizing the humanitarian cost for civilians impacted by the war?
**Conclusion:**
Thank you to both Dr. Petrova and Mr. Campbell for sharing their valuable insights. This complex issue highlights the difficult choices faced by nations navigating the evolving landscape of modern warfare. We encourage our viewers to continue engaging in
this vital conversation and demanding accountability from those in power.
